What’s so bad about echo chambers?

References

• Alfano, M., A. E. Fard, J. A. Carter, P. Clutton, and C. Klein. 2020. “Technologically scaffolded atypical cognition: the case of YouTube’s recommender system.” Synthese 199 (1): 835–858. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02724-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avnur, Y. 2020. “What’s Wrong with the Online Echo Chamber: A Motivated Reasoning Account.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (4): 578–593. doi:10.1111/japp.12426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avnur, Y., and D. Scott-Kakures. 2015. “How Irrelevant Influences Bias Belief.” Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1): 7–39. doi:10.1111/phpe.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaly, H. 2018. “Closed-mindedness and Dogmatism.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 15 (3): 261–282. doi:10.1017/epi.2018.22
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., R. Faris, and H. Roberts. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, Berit. 2008. “The Trivial Argument for Epistemic Value Pluralism. Or How I Learned to Stop Caring about Truth.” In Epistemic Value, edited by Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar, and D. Pritchard, 284–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catapano, R., Z. L. Tormala, and D. D. Rucker. 2019. “Perspective Taking and Self-persuasion: Why “Putting Yourself in their Shoes” Reduces Openness to Attitude Change.” Psychological Science 30 (3): 424–435. doi:10.1177/0956797618822697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D., S. Chun, H. Oh, J. Han, and T. Kwon. 2020. “Rumor Propagation is Amplified by Echo Chambers in Social Media.” Scientific Reports 10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57272-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisman, M. 2018. “Epistemic Normativity and Cognitive Agency.” Noûs 52 (3): 508–529. doi:10.1111/nous.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinelli, M., G. De Francisci Morales, A. Galeazzi, and M. Starnini. 2021. “The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 18 (9): 1–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.2023301118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Stewart. 1984. “Justification and Truth.” Philosophical Studies 46 (3): 279–295. doi:10.1007/BF00372907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. 2016. “Theorizing About the Epistemic.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (7-8): 839–857. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2016.1208903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossard, A., G. De Francisci Morales, K. Kalimeri, Y. Mejova, D. Paolotti, and M. Starnini. 2020. “Falling into the Echo Chamber: The Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter.” International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) 1–12. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2003.11906
   Google Scholar
• Du, Siying, and Steve Gregory. 2016. “The Echo Chamber Effect in Twitter: Does Community Polarization Increase?” In Complex Networks & Their Applications V, edited by H. Cherifi, S. Gaito, W. Quattrociocchi, and A. Sala, 373–378. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, Elizabeth, and Grant Blank. 2018. “The Echo Chamber is Overstated: The Moderating Effect of Political Interest and Diverse Media.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (5): 729–774. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzinga, B. 2020. “Echo Chambers and Audio Signal Processing.” Episteme 9 (3): 373–3931. doi:10.1017/epi.2020.33
   Google Scholar
• Fantl, J. 2021. “Fake News vs. Echo Chambers.” Social Epistemology 35 (6): 645–659. doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1946201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J., A. Siu, L. Diamond, and N. Bradburn. 2021. “Is Deliberation an Antidote to Extreme Partisan Polarization? Reflections on “America in One Room”.” American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1464–1481. doi:10.1017/S0003055421000642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. C. 2017. “Should Have Known.” Synthese 194 (8): 2863–2894. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0662-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I. 1979. “What is Justified Belief?” In Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology, edited by G. S. Pappas, 1–23. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I., and E. J. Olsson. 2009. “Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge.” In Epistemic Value, edited by A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. Pritchard, 19–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Peter J. 2011. “Does Justification Aim at Truth?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1): 51–71. doi:10.1353/cjp.2011.0000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, D. R. 2017. “Echo Chambers are Dangerous – We Must Try to Break Free of Our Online Bubbles.” The Guardian, December 4. https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2017/dec/04/echo-chambers-are-dangerous-we-must-try-to-break-free-of-our-online-bubbles.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, S. 2012. “The Value of Understanding.” Philosophy Compass 7 (2): 103–117. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00460.x
   Google Scholar
• Gowda, M. V. R., J. C. Fox, and R. D. Magelky. 1997. “Students’ Understanding of Climate Change: Insights for Scientists and Educators.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 78: 2232–2240. doi:10.1175/1520-0477-78.10.2232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, Andrew, Benjamin Lyons, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2018. “Avoiding the Echo Chamber about Echo Chambers: Why Selective Exposure to Like-minded Political News is Less Prevalent than You Think.” https://kf-site-production.s3.amazonaws.com/media_elements/files/000/000/133/original/Topos_KF_White-Paper_Nyhan_V1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, Hanna. 2021. “Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online Communities.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology, edited by Michael Hannon, and Jeroen De Ridder, 192–202. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hazlett, A. 2016. “What Does “Epistemic” Mean?” Episteme 13 (4): 539–547. doi:10.1017/epi.2016.29
   Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., L. Feldman, T. A. Myers, A. Leiserowitz, and E. Maibach. 2014. “An Attack on Science? Media Use, Trust in Scientists, and Perceptions of Global Warming.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (7): 866–883. doi:10.1177/0963662513480091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., and J. N. Cappella. 2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. 2010. “Peer Disagreement and Higher-order Evidence.” In Disagreement, edited by Richard Feldman and Ted A. Warfield, 111–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuran, Timur, and Cass R Sunstein. 1999. “Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation.” Stanford Law Review 51 (4). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=138144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackey, J. 2018. “True Story: Echo Chambers Are Not the Problem.” Morning Consult. https://morningconsult.com/opinions/true-story-echo-chambers-not-problem/.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, J. 2021. “Echo Chambers, Fake News, and Social Epistemology.” In The Epistemology of Fake News, edited by Sven Bernecker, Amy K. Flowerree, and Thomas Grundmann, 206–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, Clayton. 2012. Justification and the Truth-connection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., and G. M. Sinatra. 2012. “College Students’ Perceptions About the Plausibility of Human-Induced Climate Change.” Research in Science Education 42 (2): 201–217. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9196-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. P. 2013. “Epistemic Commitments, Epistemic Agency and Practical Reasons.” Philosophical Issues 23 (1): 343–362. doi:10.1111/phis.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. [1845] 2004. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (Vol. 1). London, UK: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, L. 2019. “Calling All Physicists.” American Journal of Physics 87: 694–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 1863. On Liberty. Project Gutenberg: Ticknor Fields. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/34901/34901-h/34901-h.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. T. 2020. “Echo chambers and Epistemic bubbles.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 17 (2): 141–161. doi:10.1017/epi.2018.32
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175–220.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What The Internet is Hiding from You. London: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, U., and N. Nottelmann. 2021. “Weighing the Costs: The Epistemic Dilemma of No-platforming.” Synthese 199 (3): 7231–7253. doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03111-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. 2014. “Truth as the Fundamental Epistemic Good.” In The Ethics of Belief, edited by J. Matheson, and R. Vitz, 112–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. 2021. “Intellectual Virtues and the Epistemic value of Truth.” Synthese 198 (6): 5515–5528. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02418-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. 2005. “There is Immediate Justification.” In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, edited by M. Steup and E. Sosa, 181–202. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, J. 2014. “A Social Epistemology of Aesthetics: Belief Polarization, Echo Chambers and Aesthetic Judgement.” Synthese 191 (11): 2513–2528. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0437-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seneca, C. 2020. “How to Break Out of Your Social Media Echo Chamber.” Wired Magazine. https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-twitter-echo-chamber-confirmation-bias.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2009. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talisse, R. B. 2019. Overdoing Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G. 2019. “My Childhood in a Cult.” The New Yorker, April 29. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/05/06/my-childhood-in-a-cult.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., A. Valeriani, P. Barberá, J. T. Jost, J. Nagler, and J. A. Tucker. 2016. “Of Echo Chambers and Contrarian Clubs: Exposure to Political Disagreement Among German and Italian Users of Twitter.” Social Media + Society 2 (3). doi:10.1177/2056305116664221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne, M., and E. Brynjolfsson. 2005. “Global Village or Cyber-Balkans? Modeling and Measuring the Integration of Electronic Communities.” Management Science 51 (6): 851–868. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veber, M. 2021. “The Epistemology of No Platforming: Defending the Defense of Stupid Ideas on University Campuses.” Journal of Controversial Ideas 1 (1):1–13. doi:10.35995/jci01010006
   Google Scholar
• Hywel T. P. Williams, H. T. P. McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., and Lambert, F. H. 2015. “Network Analysis Reveals Open Forums and Echo Chambers in Social Media Discussions of Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 32: 126–138. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 2009. Philosophical Investigations, edited by P. M. S. Hacker and J. Schulte, 4th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• L. Zagzebski. 2012. Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar