Realism and metanormativity

References

• Aklaghi, F. 2022. “Non-Realist Cognitivism, Truthmaking, and Ontological Cheating.” Ethics 132 (2): 291–321. doi:10.1086/716872
   Google Scholar
• Aytac, U., and E. Rossi. 2022. “Ideology Critique Without Morality A Radical Realism Approach.” American Political Science Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0003055422001216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, C., and T. S. Calvard. 2019. “Epistemic Vices in Organizations: Knowledge, Truth, and Unethical Conduct.” Journal of Business Ethics 160 (1): 263–276. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3897-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. 2017. “Scpeticism about the Ought-Simpliciter.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by R. Schaffer-Landau, 230–252. Oxford University Press. Chapter 11.
   Google Scholar
• Boghossian, P. 2008. “Epistemic Rules.” The Journal of Philosophy 105 (9): 472–500. doi:10.5840/jphil2008105929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, D. 1997. “Moral Motivation.” Ethics 107 (1): 4–32.
   Google Scholar
• Burelli, D. 2022. “Political Normativity and the Functional Autonomy of Politics.” European Journal of Political Theory 21 (4): 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537221145547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burelli, C., and C. Destri. 2021. “The Sources of Political Normativity: the Case for Instrumental and Epistemic Normativity in Political Realism.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (1): 397–413. doi:10.1007/s10677-021-10243-y.
   Google Scholar
• Celikates, R., and R. Jaeggi. 2017. Sozialphilosophie: Eine Einführung. Munich: C.H.Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, R. 1997. Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copp, D. 1987. “The Justice and Rationale of Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Theory and Decision 23 (1): 65–87. doi:10.1007/BF00127337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzaglio, I. 2021. “Political Realism, Legitimacy, and a Place for External Critique.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 47 (10): 1213–1236. doi:10.1177/0191453720948391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, B. 2020. “Radicalizing Realist Legitimacy.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 46 (4): 369–389. doi:10.1177/0191453719857129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, B. 2022. “How radical is radical realism?.” European Journal of Philosophy 30 (3): 1110–1124. doi:10.1111/ejop.12710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsey, D. 2013. “Two Dualisms of Practical Reason.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 8, edited by R. Schaffer-Landau, 114–139. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, M. 2017. Choosing Normative Concepts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, D. 2017. “Non-Naturalistic Realism in Metaethics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, edited by T. McPherson, and D. Plunkett, 29–42. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, E., and N. Möller. 2021. “Distinctively Political Normativity in Political Realism: Unattractive or Redundant.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (1): 433–447. doi:10.1177/0191453722113157.
   Google Scholar
• Favara, G. 2023. “Taking Politics Seriously: A Prudential Justification of Political Realism.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537221145547.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 2011. “Suspicious Minds.” Poetics Today 32 (2): 215–234. doi:10.1215/03335372-1261208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felski, F. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, S. 2019. “Defining Normativity.” In Dimensions of Normativity: New Essays on Metapethics and Jurisprudence, edited by K. Toh, D. Plunkett, and S. Shapiro, 62–104. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, P. 2002. Moral Dilemmas and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy, 179–188. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. 2010. Outside Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gledhill, J. 2012. “Rawls and Realism.” Social Theory and Practice 38 (1): 55–82. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract20123813
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2012. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2017. “Culture and Critique.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91 (1): 149–173. doi:10.1093/arisup/akx001
   Google Scholar
• Huemer, M. 2005. Ethical Intuitionism. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Husi, S. 2013. “Why Reasons Skepticism is not Self-defeating.” European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3): 424–449. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00454.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeaggi, R. 2009. “Rethinking Ideology.” In New Waves in Political Philosophy, edited by C. Zurn, and B. de Bruijn. London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Jeaggi, R. 2019. Critique of Forms of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jubb, R. 2015. “Playing Kant at the Court of King Arthur.” Political Studies 63 (4): 919–934. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jubb, R. 2019. “On What a Distinctively Political Normativity Is.” Political Studies Review 17 (4): 360–369. doi:10.1177/1478929919832251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Z. 2022. “Radical Internalism.” Philosophical Issues 32 (1): 46–64. doi:10.1111/phis.12235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutz, A. 2022a. “Moral and Political Foundations.” Moral Philosophy and Politics, https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2021-0067.
   Google Scholar
• Kreutz, A. 2022b. “On Being a Realist about Migration.” Res Publica, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-022-09564-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kreutz, A., and E. Rossi. 2022. “How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Political Normativity.” Political Studies Review. Advance online publucation. doi:10.1177/1478929922113641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leader-Maynard, J., and A. Worsnip. 2018. “Is There a Distinctively Political Normativity?” Ethics 128 (1): 756–787. doi:10.1086/697449
   Google Scholar
• Leiter, B. 2015. “Why Marxism Still Does not Need Normative Theory.” Analyse & Kritik 37 (1-2): 23–50. doi:10.1515/auk-2015-1-204
   Google Scholar
• Lord, E., and B. Maguire. 2015. “An Opinionated Guide to the Weight of Reasons.” In Weighing Reasons, edited by E. Lord, and B. Maguire. Oxford University Press, Chapter One.
   Google Scholar
• McQueen, A. 2017. “Political Realism and the Realist ‘Tradition’.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (3): 296–313. doi:10.1080/13698230.2017.1293914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nir, T. 2018. “Adorno and Marcuse: Artistic Sublimation versus Ideological Sublimation.” Cultural Critique 101: 84–101. doi:10.5749/culturalcritique.101.2018.0084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, S. 2015. “Real Politics and Metaethical Baggage.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1): 1083–1100. doi:10.1007/s10677-015-9590-8
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. 2011. On What Matters: Volume One. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. 2017. On What Matters: Volume Three. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. 2011. Sidgewickian Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. 1987. “Epistemic Norms.” Synthese 71 (1): 61–95. doi:10.1007/BF00486436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz, J., and E. Rossi. 2017. “Political Realism as Ideology Critique.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (3): 348–365. doi:10.1080/13698230.2017.1293908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queloz, M. 2021. The Practical Origins of Ideas: Genealogy as Conceptual Reverse-Engineering. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raekstad, P. 2021. “The Radical Realist Critique of Rawls: A Reconstruction and Response.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13698230.2021.1891377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raekstad, P.. 2022. Karl Marx's Realist Critique of Capitalism Freedom, Alienation, and Socialism. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Resch, R. 1989. “Modernism, Postmodernism, and Social Theory: A Comparison of Althusser and Foucault.” Poetics Today 10 (3): 511–549. doi:10.2307/1772903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1977. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, W. C. 2022. “Whose Realism? Which Legitimacy? Ideologies of Domination and Post-Rawlsian Political Theory.” Analyse & Kritik 44 (1): 41–60. doi:10.1515/auk-2022-2028
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E. 2019. “Being Realistic and Demanding the Impossible.” Constellations (oxford, England) 26 (1): 638–652. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12446
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E., and C. Argenton. 2021. “Property, Legitimacy, Ideology: A Reality Check.” The Journal of Politics 83 (3): 1046–1059. doi:10.1086/710781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, E., and M. Sleat. 2014. “Realism in Normative Political Theory.” Philosophy Compass 9 (10): 689–701. doi:10.1111/phc3.12148
   Google Scholar
• Sagdahl, M. 2014. “The Argument from Nominal-Notable Comparison, ‘Ought All Things Considered’, and Normative Pluralism.” The Journal of Ethics 18 (4): 405–425. doi:10.1007/s10892-014-9179-9
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sleat, M. 2022. “Realism and Political Normativity.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (3): 465–478. doi:10.1007/s10677-021-10239-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slote, M. 1983. Goods and Virtues. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A. 2018. “The Aptness of Anger.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 26 (2): 123–144. doi:10.1111/jopp.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A. 2019. “VII — Genealogy, Epistemology and Worldmaking.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119 (2): 127–156. doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoz009
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. 2015. How Propaganda Works. Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiffany, E. 2007. “Deflationary Normative Pluralism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (5): 231–262.
   Google Scholar
• Vayrynen, P. 2018. “Doubts about Moral Perception.” In Evaluative Perception, edited by A. Bergqvist, and R. Cowan, 109–128. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, M. 2022. “Against the Status Quo: The Social as a Resource of Critique in Realist Political Theory.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, doi:10.1080/13698230.2022.2120660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wielenberg, E. J. 2014. Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. 2002. Truth and Truthfulness. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. 2005. In the Beginning was the Deed. Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar