Implicit bias and qualiefs

References

• Balog, Katalin. 2012. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00541.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayne, Tim.2009. “Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content.” The Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236): 385–404. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.631.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, Marianne, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 991–1013. doi:10.1257/0002828042002561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, Ned. 2007. “Max Black’s Objection to Mind-Body-Identity.” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge, edited by T. Alter and S. Walter, 249–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bortolotti, Lisa. 2009. Delusions and Other Irrational Beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosse, Anne. 2022. “Stereotyping and Generics.” Inquiry.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, Pablo, Richard E. Petty, and Michael J. McCaslin. 2009. “Changing Attitudes on Implicit Versus Explicit Measures.” In Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures, edited by R. Petty, R. Fazio and P. Brinol, 285–326. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, Berit. 2013. “Do we Perceive Natural Kind Properties?” Philosophical Studies 162 (1): 35–42. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9985-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownstein, Michael, and Alex Madva. 2018. “Stereotypes, Prejudice, and the Taxonomy of the Implicit Social Mind.” Noûs 52 (3): 611–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownstein, Michael, and JenniferSaul, eds. 2016. Implicit Bias & Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, Nick. 2019. “What we Can (and Can't) Infer About Implicit Bias from Debiasing Experiments.” Synthese (2): 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, Peter, and Benedicte Veillet. 2007. “The Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (9–10): 212–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David.2003. “The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief.” In Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Q. Smith, and A. Jokic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David. 2007. “Phenomenal Concepts and the Explanatory Gap.” In T. Alter & S. Walter (eds.), 167–154. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Cimpian, A., and L. C. Erickson. 2012. “Remembering Kinds: New Evidence That Categories are Privileged in Children’s Thinking.” Cognitive Psychology 64 (3): 161–185. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A.2004. “Generics and Mental Representation.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (5): 529–556. doi:10.1023/B:LING.0000033851.25870.3e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, Gregory, and Anna Ichino. 2012. “Aliefs Don’t Exist, But Some of Their Relatives Do.” Analysis 72: 788–798. doi:10.1093/analys/ans088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, Nilanjana, and Anthony Greenwald. 2001. “On the Malleability of Automatic Attitudes: Combating Automatic Prejudice with Images of Admired and Disliked Individuals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (5): 800–814. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declerk, R. 1986. “The Manifold Interpretations of Generic Sentences.” Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale 68: 149–188. doi:10.1016/0024-3841(86)90002-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, Jan.2014. “A Propositional Model of Implicit Evaluation.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 8 (7): 342–353. doi:10.1111/spc3.12111.
   Google Scholar
• Del Pinal, Guillermo, and Shannon Spaulding. 2018. “Conceptual Centrality and Implicit Bias.” Mind & Language 33 (1): 95–111. doi:10.1111/mila.12166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, John F., and Samuel L Gaertner. 2000. “Aversive Racism and Selection Decisions: 1989 and 1999.” Psychological Science 11: 319–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, Jennifer L., Phillip A. Goff, Valerie J. Purdie, and Paul G. Davies. 2004. “Seeing Black: Race, Crime, and Visual Processing.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 87 (6): 876–893. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, Andy.2011. “Comments on Gendler’s The Epistemic Costs of Implicit Bias.” Philosophical Studies 156 (1): 65–79. doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9803-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and K. Frankish. 2009. In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and David E. Over. 2004. If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and K. Stanovich. 2013. “Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3): 223–241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry A.1983. Modularity of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, Martina.2014. “A Dualist Account of Phenomenal Concepts.” In Contemporary Dualism: A Defense, edited by Andrea Lavazza, and Howard Robinson, 112–136. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, Martina. forthcoming a. “Phenomenal Holism and Cognitive Phenomenology.” Erkenntnis.
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, Martina.forthcoming b. “Closing the conceptual gap in epistemic injustice”. Philosophical Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, Bertram. 2019. “Six Lessons for a Cogent Science of Implicit Bias and its Criticism.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 14: 574–595. doi:10.1177/1745691619826015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, Bertram, and Galen V Bodenhausen. 2006. “Associative and Propositional Processes in Evaluation: An Integrative Review of Implicit and Explicit Attitude Change.” Psychological Bulletin 132 (5): 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, Bertram, and Galen V.Bodenhausen. 2014. “The Associative—Propositional Evaluation Model: Operating Principles and Operating Conditions of Evaluation.” In Sherman, Gawronski, & Trope, Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind, 188–203. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, Bertram, Roland Deutsch, Sawsan Mbirkou, Beate Seibt, and Fritz Strack. 2008. “When “Just Say No” is not Enough: Affirmation Versus Negation Training and the Reduction of Automatic Stereotype Activation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44: 370–377. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, Bertram, Wilhelm Hofmann, and Christopher Wilbur. 2006. “Are “Implicit” Attitudes Unconscious?” Consciousness and Cognition 15: 485–499. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. Oxford Cognitive Development.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. 2010. “Generics as a Window Onto Young Children’s Concepts.” In Kinds, Things, and Stuff: The Cognitive Side of Generics and Mass Terms, edited by F. J. Pelletier, 100–112. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., P. J. Goetz, B. S. Sarnecka, and J. Flukes. 2008. “Generic Language in Parent-Child Conversations.” Language Learning and Development 4: 1–31. doi:10.1080/15475440701542625.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gendler, Tamar Szabó. 2008a. “Alief and Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 105: 634–663. doi:10.5840/jphil20081051025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendler, Tamar Szabó. 2008b. “Alief in Action (and Reaction).” Mind & Language 23 (5): 552–585. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00352.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, A. P., B. Seibt, and M. R. Banaji. 2006. “Easier Done Than Undone: Asymmetry in the Malleability of Implicit Preferences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülgöz, S., and S. A. Gelman. 2015. “Children's Recall of Generic and Specific Labels Regarding Animals and People.” Cognitive Development 33: 84–98. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, A., and Bertrand Gawronski. 2019. “Facing One’s Implicit Biases: From Awareness to Acknowledgment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 116 (5): 769–794. doi:10.1037/pspi0000155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, A., Charles M. Judd, Holen K. Hirsh, and Irene, V. Blair. 2014. “Awareness of Implicit Attitudes.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (3): 1369–1392. doi:10.1037/a0035028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, Matthew D., and A. Cimpian. 2017. “Investigating the Cognitive Structure of Stereotypes: Generic Beliefs About Groups Predict Social Judgments Better Than Statistical Beliefs.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 146 (5): 607–614. doi:10.1037/xge0000297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, Nick, Louis Rothschild, and Donald Ernst. 2022. “Are Essentialist Beliefs Associated with Prejudice?” British Journal of Social Psychology 41: 87–100. doi:10.1348/014466602165072.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally. 2011. “Ideology, Generics, and Common Ground.” In Feminist Metaphysics: Explorations in the Ontology of Sex, Gender, and the Self, edited by C. Witt, 179–209. ct: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Helton, Grace. 2020. “If You Can't Change What You Believe, You Don't Believe It”. Noûs 54 (3): 501–526
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, Jules. 2016. “What Do We Want from a Model of Implicit Cognition?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116 (2): 153–179. doi:10.1093/arisoc/aow005.
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, Jules, Robin Scaife, and Tom Stafford. 2017. “What is Implicit Bias?” Philosophy Compass, doi:10.1111/phc3.12437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holroyd, Jules, and JosephSweetman. 2016. “The Heterogeneity of Implicit Bias.” In Implicit Bias and Philosophy. Vol. 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, edited by Michael Brownstein and Jennifer Saul, 80–103. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Xiaoqing, Bertram Gawronski, and Robert Balas. 2017. “Propositional Versus Dual-Process Accounts of Evaluative Conditioning: II. The Effectiveness of Counter-Conditioning and Counter-Instructions in Changing Implicit and Explicit Evaluations.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 8 (8): 858–866. doi:10.1177/1948550617691094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemer, Michael. 2001. Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Gabbrielle M. forthcoming. “The Structure of Bias.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Daniel, and E. Roedder. 2008. “Racial Cognition and the Ethics of Implicit Bias.” Philosophy Compass 3 (3): 522–540. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00138.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, Amy. 2001. “Putting the Image Back in Imagination.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 85–109. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00042.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. in collaboration with Claudia Gerstner 1987. An Outline of Genericity in collaboration with Claudia Gerstner, SNS-Bericht 87–23. University of Tübingen.
   Google Scholar
• Kurdi, B., and M. R. Banaji. 2019. “Attitude Change via Repeated Evaluative Pairings Versus Evaluative Statements: Shared and Unique Features.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 116 (5): 681–703. doi:10.1037/pspa0000151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Calvin K., Allison L. Skinner, Erin Cooley, Sohad Murrar, Markus Brauer, Thierry Devos, Jimmy Calanchini, et al. 2016. “Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: Ii. Intervention Effectiveness Across Time.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 (8): 1001–1016. doi:10.1037/xge0000179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton, R., S. Haslanger, and L. Anderson. 2012. “Language and Race.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language, edited by G. Russell, and D. Graff Fara, 753–767. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Keith. 2019. Exemplars of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, Sarah-Jane. 2008. “Generics: Cognition and Acquisition.” The Philosophical Review 117 (1): 1–47. doi:10.1215/00318108-2007-023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, Sarah-Jane. 2012. “Generics Articulate Default Generalizations.” Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 41: 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, Sarah-Jane. 2017. “The Original Sin of Cognition.” Journal of Philosophy 114 (8): 393–421. doi:10.5840/jphil2017114828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, Sarah-Jane, and Adam Lerner. 2016. “Generic Generalizations”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =  https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/generics/.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, Janet. 2007. “What is a Phenomenal Concept?” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge, edited by Torin Alter and Sven Walter, 87–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Neil.2015. “Neither Fish nor Fowl: Implicit Attitudes as Patchy Endorsements.” Noûs 49 (4): 800–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1975. “Adverbs of Quantification.” In Formal Semantics of Natural Language, edited by E. L. Keenan, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liebesman, D.2011. “Simple Generics.” Nous (detroit, Mich ) 45 (3): 409–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebesman, D., and O. Magidor. 2017. “Copredication and Property Inheritance.” Philosophical Issues 27 (1): 131–166. doi:10.1111/phis.12104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebesman, David, and Rachel K.Sterken. 2021. “Generics and the Metaphysics of Kinds.” Philosophy Compass (7): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loar, Brian, 1997. “Phenomenal States.” In The Nature of Consciousness, edited by Ned Block. et al. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madva, Alex. 2016b. “Virtue, Social Knowledge, and Implicit Bias”, 191–215. In: Brownstein & Saul.
   Google Scholar
• Madva, Alex. 2016. “Why Implicit Attitudes are (Probably) not Beliefs.” Synthese 193: 2659–2684. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0874-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, Eric. 2013. “Against Alief.” Philosophical Studies 165 (1): 197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, Eric. 2016. “Attitude, Inference, Association: On the Propositional Structure of Implicit Bias.” Noûs 50 (3): 629–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Chris J., Jan De Houwer, and Peter F. Lovibond. 2009. “The Propositional Nature of Human Associative Learning.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (02): 183–198. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanay, Bence. 2021. “Implicit Bias as Mental Imagery.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 7 (3): 329–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A. 2020. “The Radical Account of Bare Plural Generics.” Philosophical Studies 177: 1303–1331. doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01254-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickel, Bernhard. 2008. “Generics and the Ways of Normality.” Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (6): 629–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickel, B. 2016. Between Logic and the World: An Integrated Theory of Generics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickel, B. 2017. “Generics.” In The Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed., edited by B. Hale, A. Miller, and C. Wright. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nier, J. 2001. “How Dissociated are Implicit and Explicit Racial Attitudes? A Bogus Pipeline Approach.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 8 (1): 39–52. doi:10.1177/1368430205048615.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Michael, and Russell Fazio. 2006. “Reducing Automatically-Activated Racial Prejudice through Implicit Evaluative Conditioning.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (4): 421–433. doi:10.1177/0146167205284004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papineau, David. 2007. “Phenomenal and Perceptual Concepts.” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge, edited by T. Alter and S. Walter, 111–145. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, Keith. 2006. “Weapon Bias: Split-second Decisions and Unintended Stereotyping.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (6): 287–291. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00454.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, F. J., and N. Asher. 2017. “Generics and Defaults.” In Handbook of Logic and Language, edited by J. van Benthem, and A. ter Meulen, 1125–1177. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, D., R. K. Sterken, and T. Sundell. 2023. “Generics and Metalinguistic Negotiation.” Synthese 201: 50. doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03862-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Zenon W. 1999. “Is Vision Continuous with Cognition?: The Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Perception.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 341–423. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M., S.-J. Leslie, and C. M. Tworek. 2012. “Cultural Transmission of Social Essentialism.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (34): 13526–13531. doi:10.1073/pnas.1208951109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, Katherine. 2019. “Should we use Racial and Gender Generics?” Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (1): 33–41. doi:10.1002/tht3.402.
   Google Scholar
• Rooth, D. O. 2010. “Automatic Associations and Discrimination in Hiring: Real World Evidence.” Labour Economics 17 (3): 523–534. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2009.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul, Jennifer. 2013. “Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy.” In Women in Philosophy, edited by K. Hutchinson, and F. Jenkins, 39–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saul, Jennifer. 2017. “Are Generics Especially Pernicious?” Inquiry, 1–18. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2017.1285995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2010. “Acting contrary to our professed beliefs or the gulf between occur- rent judgment and dispositional belief.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4): 531–553. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01381.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, Susanna. 2010. The Contents of Visual Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloman, Steven A. 1996. “The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 119: 3–22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, Jason, and Timothy Williamson. 2001. “Knowing How.” Journal of Philosophy 98 (8): 411–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterken, R. 2015. “Leslie on Generics.” Philosophical Studies 172 (9): 2493–2512. doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0429-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterken, R. 2016. “Generics, Covert Structure and Logical Form.” Mind and Languag 31 (5): 503–529. doi:10.1111/mila.12118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan-Bissett, Ema. 2019. “Biased by our Unconscious Imaginings.” Mind and Language 34 (5): 627–647. doi:10.1111/mila.12225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichman, M. 2019. “The Sophisticated Kind Theory.” Inquiry, 1–47. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2016.1267407.
   Google Scholar
• Toribio, Josefa. 2018. “Visual Experience: Rich but Impenetrable.” Synthese 195 (8): 3389–3406. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0889-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye, M. 2000. Consciousness, Color and Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, P., Y. Ye, and J. De Houwer. 2018. “Changing Deep-Rooted Implicit Evaluation in the Blink of an Eye: Negative Verbal Information Shifts Automatic Liking of Gandhi.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 1948550617752064.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, David. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welpinghus, Anna. 2020. “The Imagination Model of Implicit Bias.” Philosophical Studies 177: 1611–1633. doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01277-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, D., S.-J. Leslie, and M. Rhodes. 2015. “What a Loaded Generalization: Generics and Social Cognition.” Philosophy Compass 10 (9): 625–635. doi:10.1111/phc3.12250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar