Do group agents have free will?

References

• Alvarez, M. 2013. “Agency and Two-Way Powers.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (1_pt_1): 101–121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2013.00347.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, M. 2006. Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. E. 1999. Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. E. 2014. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, R. A. 2012. “The Normative Standing of Group Agents.” Episteme 9 (3): 283–291. doi:10.1017/epi.2012.17.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, J. 2012. “Laws, Causation and Dynamics at Different Levels.” Interface Focus 2 (1): 101–114. doi:10.1098/rsfs.2011.0052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, R. 1966. “Freedom and Action.” In Freedom and Determinism, edited by K. Lehrer, 11–44. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. 1984. Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erskine, T., ed. 2003. Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, A. 1984. “The Natural Ontological Attitude.” In Scientific Realism, edited by J. Leplin, 83–107. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. 1969. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” The Journal of Philosophy 66 (23): 829–839. doi:10.2307/2023833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, P. A. 1984. Collective and Corporate Responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. 1989. On Social Facts. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, N., and R. Sugden. 2007. “Collective Intentions and Team Agency.” Journal of Philosophy 104 (3): 109–137. doi:10.5840/jphil2007104328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardian. 2023. “Revealed: Exxon Made ‘Breathtakingly’ Accurate Climate Predictions in 1970s and 80s.” The Guardian, 12 January 2023. Accessed February 10, 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/12/exxon-climate-change-global-warming-research.
   Google Scholar
• Haji, I. 2006. “On the Ultimate Responsibility of Collectives.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30 (1): 292–308. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.2006.00141.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, K. M. 2013. “‘If You Tickle Us …’: How Corporations Can Be Moral Agents Without Being Persons.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (3): 319–335. doi:10.1007/s10790-013-9391-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, K. M. 2014. “The Free Will of Corporations (and Other Collectives).” Philosophical Studies 168 (1): 241–260. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0128-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, K. M. 2018. “Does the Machine Need a Ghost? Corporate Agents as Nonconscious Kantian Moral Agents.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4 (1): 67–86. doi:10.1017/apa.2018.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, K. M. 2020. “Assembling the Elephant: Attending to the Metaphysics of Corporate Agents.” In The Routledge Handbook of Collective Responsibility, edited by S. Bazargan-Forward, and D. Tollefsen, 113–126. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hindriks, F. 2014. “How Autonomous Are Collective Agents? Corporate Rights and Normative Individualism.” Erkenntnis 79 (9): 1565–1585. doi:10.1007/s10670-014-9629-6.
   Google Scholar
• Huebner, B. 2014. Macrocognition: A Theory of Distributed Minds and Collective Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, S. 1999. “Responsibility, Reason, and Irrelevant Alternatives.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 28 (3): 205–241. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1999.00205.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, F., P. Pettit, and M. Smith. 2004. Mind, Morality, and Explanation: Selected Collaborations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, R. 1999. “Responsibility, Luck, and Chance: Reflections on Free Will and Indeterminism.” Journal of Philosophy 96 (5): 217–240. doi:10.2307/2564666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, R., ed. 2002. The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libet, B., C. A. Gleason, E. W. Wright, and D. K. Pearl. 1983. “Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential): The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary Act.” Brain 106: 623–642. doi:10.1093/brain/106.3.623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, C. 2014. “Free Will, Determinism, and the Possibility of Doing Otherwise.” Noûs 48 (1): 156–178. doi:10.1111/nous.12019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, C. 2018. “What is it Like to be a Group Agent?” Noûs 52 (2): 295–319. doi:10.1111/nous.12162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, C. 2019. Why Free Will is Real. Cambridge: MA (Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• List, C. 2022. “The Naturalistic Case for Free Will.” In Levels of Reality in Science and Philosophy, Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science, edited by S. Ioannidis, G. Vishne, M. Hemmo, and O. Shenker, 171–194. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• List, C., and P. Menzies. 2009. “Non-reductive Physicalism and the Limits of the Exclusion Principle.” Journal of Philosophy 106 (9): 475–502. doi:10.5840/jphil2009106936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, C., and P. Menzies. 2017. “My Brain Made Me Do It: The Exclusion Argument Against Free Will, and What’s Wrong with It.” In Making a Difference: Essays on the Philosophy of Causation, edited by H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, and H. Price, 269–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• List, C., and P. Pettit. 2002. “Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result.” Economics and Philosophy 18 (1): 89–110. doi:10.1017/S0266267102001098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, C., and P. Pettit. 2006. “Group Agency and Supervenience.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1): 85–105. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00032.x.
   Google Scholar
• List, C., and P. Pettit. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• List, C., and M. Pivato. 2015. “Emergent Chance.” The Philosophical Review 124 (1): 119–152. doi:10.1215/00318108-2812670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, C., and C. Puppe. 2009. “Judgment Aggregation: A Survey.” In Oxford Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, edited by P. Anand, C. Puppe, and P. Pattanaik, 457–482. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• List, C., and K. Spiekermann. 2013. “Methodological Individualism and Holism in Political Science: A Reconciliation.” American Political Science Review 107 (4): 629–643. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J. 2015. “The Agentive Modalities.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 113–134. doi:10.1111/phpr.12038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moen, L. 2023. “Eliminating Group Agency.” Economics and Philosophy 39 (1): 43–66. doi:10.1017/S0266267121000341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G. E. 1912. Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nahmias, E., S. Morris, T. Nadelhoffer, and J. Turner. 2005. “Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions About Free Will and Moral Responsibility.” Philosophical Psychology 18 (5): 561–584. doi:10.1080/09515080500264180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, T. 2000. Persons and Causes: The Metaphysics of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2003. “Groups with Minds of Their Own.” In Socializing Metaphysics, edited by F. Schmitt, 167–193. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2007. “Responsibility Incorporated.” Ethics 117 (2): 171–201. doi:10.1086/510695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. 1977. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raatikainen, P. 2010. “Causation, Exclusion, and the Special Sciences.” Erkenntnis 73 (3): 349–363. doi:10.1007/s10670-010-9236-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskies, A. L. 2012. “Don’t Panic: Self-Authorship Without Obscure Metaphysics.” Philosophical Perspectives 26: 323–342. doi:10.1111/phpe.12016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovane, C. 1997. The Bounds of Agency: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, H., A. Chatterjee, F. de Brigard, J. Knobe, S. Nichols, and S. Sirker. 2010. “Is Belief in Free Will a Cultural Universal?” Mind and Language 25 (3): 346–358. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01393.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward, H. 2012. A Metaphysics for Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tollefsen, D. P. 2002. “Collective Intentionality and the Social Sciences.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1): 25–50. doi:10.1177/004839310203200102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollefsen, D. P. 2015. Groups as Agents. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomela, R. 2007. The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomela, R. 2013. Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Inwagen, P. 1975. “The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism.” Philosophical Studies 27 (3): 185–199. doi:10.1007/BF01624156.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. J. 1998. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werndl, Charlotte. 2009. “Are Deterministic Descriptions and Indeterministic Descriptions Observationally Equivalent?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (3): 232–242. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, J. 2008. “Mental Causation and Neural Mechanisms.” In Being Reduced: New Essays on Reduction, Explanation, and Causation, edited by J. Hohwy, and J. Kallestrup, 218–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshimi, J. 2012. “Supervenience, Dynamical Systems Theory, and Non-Reductive Physicalism.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (2): 373–398. doi:10.1093/bjps/axr019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar