Target-centred virtue ethics: Aristotelian or Confucian?

References

• Angle, Stephen C. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Annas, Julia. 2011. Intelligent Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, R. Eugene. 1971. “Act-Utilitarianism: Account of Right-Making Characteristics or Decision-Making Procedure?” American Philosophical Quarterly 8: 257–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, Michael S. 2004. “Against Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.” Philosophical Papers 33: 1–10. doi:10.1080/05568640409485132.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Lisheng (陈立胜). 2019. The Workings of Sagehood: A Study of Wang Yangming’s ‘Extending liangzhi’ and His Theory of Practical Cultivation [圣人之机: 王阳明致良知功夫论研究]. Beijing 北京: Sanlian shudian 三联书店.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Lai (陈来). [1991] 2005. The Boundary between Being and Non-Being: The Spirit of Wang Yangming’s Philosophy [有无之境: 王阳明哲学的精神]. Beijing 北京: Renmin Chubanshe 人民出版社.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, Roger. 2015. “A Third Method of Ethics?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 257–273. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00607.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, Julia. 2011. Consequentialism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, Philippa. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1991. “Virtue Theory and Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20: 223–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2002. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mengzi and Wang Yangming. Indianapolis: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, Harvey. 2022. “The Introspective Model of Genuine Knowledge in Wang Yangming.” The Philosophical Review 131 (2): 169–213. doi:10.1215/00318108-9554691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miracchi, Lisa. 2014. “Getting Things Done.” PhD diss., Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Slote, Michael. 2001. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slote, Michael. 2010. Moral Sentimentalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Nicholas R. 2017. “Right-Makers and the Targets of Virtue.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 51: 311–326. doi:10.1007/s10790-016-9571-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Nicholas R. 2018. “Right Action as Virtuous Action.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96: 241–254. doi:10.1080/00048402.2017.1352611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Nicholas R. 2020. “Target-Centered Virtue Ethics.” In Handbuch Tugend und Tugendethik, edited by Christoph Halbig, and Felix Timmermann, 1–14. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, Ernest. 2011. Knowing Full Well. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanton, Christine. 2001. “A Virtue Ethical Account of Right Action.” Ethics 112: 32–52. doi:10.1086/322742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanton, Christine. 2003. Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanton, Christine. 2010. “Virtue Ethics and the Problem of Moral Disagreement.” Philosophical Topics 38: 157–180. doi:10.5840/philtopics201038218.
   Google Scholar
• Swanton, Christine. 2021. Target Centred Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tien, David W. 2010. “Metaphysics and the Basis of Morality in the Philosophy of Wang Yangming.” In Dao Companion to Neo-Confucian Philosophy, edited by John Makeham, 295–314. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, Liezl. 2009. “Agent-Based Virtue Ethics and the Problem of Action Guidance.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 6: 50–69. doi:10.1163/174552409X365928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, Liezl. 2011. “Rightness and Goodness in Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.” Journal of Philosophical Research 36: 103–114. doi:10.5840/jpr_2011_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, Liezl. 2014. “Right Action and the Targets of Virtue.” In The Handbook of Virtue Ethics, edited by Stan van Hooft, 118–129. Durham: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, Liezl. 2019. Virtue Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vasiliou, Iakovos. 2013. “Aristotle, Agents, and Actions.” In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide, edited by Jon Miller, 170–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Yangming (王陽明). 1963. Instructions for Practical Living, and Other Neo-Confucian Writings. Translated by Wing-Tsit Chan. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Yangming (王陽明). 2011. The Complete Works of Wang Yangming [王陽明全集]. Edited by Wu Guang 吳光, Qian Ming 錢明, Dong Ping 董平, and Yao Yanfu 姚延福, 2 vols. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Zhenhua (郁振华). 2014. On Knowing How in Morality and Metaphysics: An Inquiry Based on Ryle and Wang Yangming [论道德–形上学的能力之知–基于赖尔与王阳明的探讨]. Zhongguo Shehui Kexue 中国社会科学 12: 22–41.
   Google Scholar