Prospects for pure procedural moral progress

References

• Anderson, E. 2016. “The Social Epistemology of Morality: Learning from the Forgotten History of the Abolition of Slavery.” In The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives, edited by M. S. Brady, and M. Fricker, 75–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33 (124): 1–19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3749051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvan, M. 2021. “From Rational Self-Interest to Liberalism: A Hole in Cofnas’s Debunking Explanation of Moral Progress.” Inquiry.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. 2002. “Social Moral Epistemology.” Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2): 126–152. doi:10.1017/S0265052502192065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. 2004. “Political Liberalism and Social Epistemology.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (2): 95–130. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00008.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., and R. Powell. 2018. The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cofnas, N. 2020. “A Debunking Explanation for Moral Progress.” Philosophical Studies 177 (11): 3171–3191. doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01365-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 2000. If You’re an Egalitarian, How Come You’re So Rich?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjz82m8.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. B. 1987. “Reflections on Abolitionism and Ideological Hegemony.” The American Historical Review 92 (4): 797–812. doi:10.2307/1863947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch, D. 2006. “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from What Is Constitutive of Action.” The Philosophical Review 115 (2): 169–198. doi:10.1215/00318108-2005-014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. 2019. “The Dynamics of Moral Revolutions – Prelude to Future Investigations and Interventions.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3): 779–792. doi:10.1007/s10677-019-10005-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, P. 1959. “Moral Beliefs.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59 (1): 83–104. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/59.1.83.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, P. 1972. “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives.” The Philosophical Review 81 (3): 305–316. doi:10.2307/2184328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M. J., J. R. Harrington, and J. C. Jackson. 2017. “The Strength of Social Norms Across Human Groups.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 12 (5): 800–809. doi:10.1177/1745691617708631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M. J., J. L. Raver, L. Nishii, L. M. Leslie, J. Lun, B. C. Lim, L. Duan, et al. 2011. “Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study.” Science 332 (6033): 1100–1104. doi:10.1126/science.1197754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by Lenhardt, C. and Nicholsen, S.W. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1986. “Making up People.” In Historical Ontology, edited by I. Hacking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1996. “The Looping Effects of Human Kinds.” In Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate, edited by D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A. J. Premack, 351–394. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. L. 1985. “Capitalism and the Origins of the Humanitarian Sensibility, Part 1.” The American Historical Review 90 (2): 339–361. doi:10.2307/1852669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopster, J. 2019. “Explaining Historical Moral Convergence: The Empirical Case Against Realist Intuitionism.” Philosophical Studies 177 (5): 1255–1273. doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01251-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemer, M. 2015. “A Liberal Realist Answer to Debunking Skeptics: The Empirical Case for Realism.” Philosophical Studies 173 (7): 1983–2010. doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0588-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. 2000. Pragmatism and Other Writings, edited by J. Gunn. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I., and A. W. Wood. (1784) 1996. “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?” In Practical Philosophy, edited by M. J. Gregor, 11–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 1992. “The Naturalists Return.” The Philosophical Review 101 (1): 53–114. doi:10.2307/2185044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2010. “Four Ways of ‘Biologicizing’ Ethics.” In Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings, edited by M. Ruse, 279–388. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2011. The Ethical Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2012. Preludes to Pragmatism: Toward a Reconstruction of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2015. “On Progress.” In Performance and Progress: Essays on Capitalism, Business, and Society, edited by S. Rangan, 115–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2017. “Social Progress.” Social Philosophy and Policy 34 (2): 46–65. doi:10.1017/S0265052517000206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2021. Moral Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, C. 2021. “Beyond Adaptive Preferences: Rethinking Women's Complicity in Their own Subordination.” European Journal of Philosophy 30 (4): 1317–1334. doi:10.1111/ejop.12742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave, 91–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. 1978. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, D. 2019. “The Study of Moral Revolutions as Naturalized Moral Epistemology.” Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 5 (2), doi:10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7284.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue. Notre Dame, In: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., F. Engels, and D. Torr. 1936. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Correspondence, 1846-1895: A Selection with Commentary and Notes. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1859) 1985. On Liberty. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 1869. The Subjection of Women. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. 1887. On the Genealogy of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasants, N. 2010. “Moral Argument Is Not Enough.” Philosophical Topics 38 (1): 159–180. doi:10.5840/philtopics20103818.
   Google Scholar
• Price, H. 1994. “Semantic Minimalism and the Frege Point.” In Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, edited by S. L. Tsohatzidis, 132–155. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. 1969. “Epistemology Naturalized.” In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, edited by J. Kim, and E. Sosa, 69–90. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2001. “Feminism and Pragmatism.” Identities 1 (1): 187–226. doi:10.51151/identities.v1i1.22.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, H. 2018. Debunking Arguments in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, H. 2019. “Butchering Benevolence Moral Progress Beyond the Expanding Circle.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (1): 153–167. doi:10.1007/s10677-019-09983-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, N. 2017. “The function of morality.” Philosophical Studies 174 (5): 1127–1144. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0746-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. 1961. “Social Morality and Individual Ideal.” Philosophy 36 (136): 1–17. doi:10.1017/S003181910005779X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, S. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127 (1): 109–166. doi:10.1007/s11098-005-1726-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On Certainty (Uber Gewissheit). ed. Anscombe, G.E.M. and von Wright, G.H. Translated by Paul, D. and Anscombe, G.E.M. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar