Modal normativism on semantic rules

References

• Brandom, Robert. 2007. “Inferentialism and Some of Its Challenges.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3): 651–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.2007.74.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2013. “Conceptual Ethics I.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.v8.12.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisman, Matthew, and Kevin Scharp. 2022. “Book Review of Norms and Necessity by Amie Thomasson.” Mind. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzab094.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, Tom, and Jennifer Wang. 2022. “Modal Normativism and De Re Modality.” Argumenta 7 (2): 293–307. https://doi.org/10.14275/2465-2334/202214.don.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, Philippa. 1972. “Morality As a System of Hypothetical Imperatives.” The Philosophical Review 81 (3): 305–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan. 2003. Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan. 2013. Meaning and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattiangadi, Anandi. 2007. Oughts and Thoughts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. “What Must and Can Must and Can Mean.” Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3): 337–355. Reprinted with Introduction in Modals and Conditionals. Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353453.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. “The Notional Category of Modality.” In Words, Worlds, and Contexts, edited by H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser, 3874. de Gruyter. Reprinted with Introduction in Modals and Conditionals. Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1979a. “A Problem with Permission.” In Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka On the Occasion of His Fiftieth Birthday on January 12, 1979, edited by Esa Saarinen, Risto Hilpinen, Ilkka Niiniluoto, and Merrill Provence Hintikka, vol. 124. Synthese Library (Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science). Springer. Reprinted in Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1979b. “Scorekeeping in a Language Game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1): 339–359. Reprinted in Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258436.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, Ruth Barcan. 1961. “Modalities and Intensional Languages.” Synthese 13 (4): 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486629.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2011. “Against Quietist Normative Realism.” Philosophical Studies 154 (2): 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9535-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2018. “Authoritatively Normative Concepts.” Chap. 12 in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, 13:253–277. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters, Volume One. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 2015. Ontology Made Easy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 2020a. “A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work.” Chap. 21 in Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen, and David Plunkett, 435–458. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L.. 2020b. Norms and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Daniel. 2017. “Expressivism and Varieties of Normativity.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, 12:265–293. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Daniel. 2019. “Mere Formalities: Fictional Normativity and Normative Authority.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (6): 828–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1433795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar