Conceptual engineering for analytic theology

References

• Abdelnour, Mohammed Gamal. 2023. “The Qurʾān and the Future of Islamic Analytic Theology.” Religions 14 (4): 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston, William P. 1988. “Referring to God.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 24 (3): 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, James. 2007. Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of Its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, James. 2018. “On the Rationality of Positive Mysterianism.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (3): 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9668-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker-Hytch, Max. 2016. “Analytic Theology and Analytic Philosophy of Religion: What’s the Difference?” Journal of Analytic Theology 4: 347–361. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2016-4.120023010007a.
   Google Scholar
• Ballarin, Roberta. 2022. “On the Genealogy of Modality: The Necessity of Origin and the Origin of Necessity.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8 (3): 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2021.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Elizabeth. 2016. The Minority Body: A Theory of Disability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, JC, and A. J. Cotnoir. 2017. “God of the Gaps: A Neglected Reply to God? Stone Problem.” Analysis 77 (4): 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, Delia. 2020. “Ontological Disputes and the Phenomenon of Metalinguistic Negotiation: Charting the Territory.” Philosophy Compass 15 (7): e12684. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, Matthew A., P. John, and Dani Rabinowitz Hawthorne. 2018. Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Christine. 2019. “What I Learned From Being Accidentally Celibate For 5 Years”. Huffpost, April 8, 2019. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/accidentally-celibate-what-i-learned_n_5ca4ffffe4b0ed0d78103577.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2013. “Conceptual Ethics I.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12086.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. 1st ed. Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2020a. “Conceptual Engineering: The Master Argument.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Herman Cappelen, David Plunkett, and Alexis Burgess, 132–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2020b. “Conceptual Engineering, Topics, Metasemantics, and Lack of Control.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (5): 594–605. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman, and David Plunkett. 2020. “A Guided Tour of Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Herman Cappelen, David Plunkett, and Alexis Burgess, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, Rudolf. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, Rudolf. 1963. “Replies and Systematic Expositions.” In The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, 859–1013. La Salle: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David J. 2011. “Verbal Disputes.” Philosophical Review 120 (4): 515–566. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1334478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58 (1): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotnoir, A. J. 2018. “Theism and Dialetheism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 592–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1384846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotnoir, A. J. 2019. “On the Role of Logic in Analytic Theology: Exploring the Wider Context of Beall’s Philosophy of Logic.” Journal of Analytic Theology 7 (1): 508–528. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2019-7.00-51-51021417.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, Oliver D., and Michael C. Rea, eds. 2009. Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203567.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Dorr, Cian, and John Hawthorne. 2014. “Semantic Plasticity and Speech Reports.” The Philosophical Review 123 (3): 281–338. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2683531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2015. “Conceptual Genealogy for Analytic Philosophy.” In Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Jeffrey A. Bell, Andrew Cutrofello, and M. Paul, 75–110. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fales, Evan. 2009. Divine Intervention: Metaphysical and Epistemological Puzzles. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greenough, Patrick. 2019. “Conceptual Marxism and Truth: Inquiry Symposium on Kevin Scharp’s Replacing Truth.” Inquiry 62 (4): 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1287919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenough, Patrick. Forthcoming. “Utopian Philosophy.” In Synthese, edited by M.G. Isaac, S. Koch, and K. Scharp. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Greenough, Patrick. n.d. Manuscript. ‘From Conceptual Engineering to Reality Engineering’.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstreet, Rosanna. 2021. “Moby: “I Have Been Accidentally Celibate for Six Years”’. The Guardian, November 6, sec. Life and style. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2021/nov/06/moby-accidentally-celibate-for-six-years.
   Google Scholar
• Grunau, Karolin, Helena E. Bieselt, Pelin Gul, and Tom R. Kupfer. 2022. “Unwanted Celibacy Is Associated with Misogynistic Attitudes Even After Controlling for Personality.” Personality and Individual Differences 199: 111860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldane, John. 1997. “Analytical Thomism.” The Monist 80 (4): 485–486. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist199780428.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, James F. 1991. “The Causal Theory of Reference and Religious Language.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 29 (2): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, Hud. 2021. Fallenness and Flourishing. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, Manuel Gustavo. 2020. “How to Conceptually Engineer Conceptual Engineering?” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1719881.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, Manuel Gustavo. 2021a. “Broad-Spectrum Conceptual Engineering.” Ratio: An International Journal for Analytic Philosophy 34 (4): 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12311.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, Manuel Gustavo. 2021b. “Post-Truth Conceptual Engineering.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, Manuel Gustavo. 2021c. “What Should Conceptual Engineering Be All About?” Philosophia Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 5: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00367-x.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, Manuel Gustavo. 2021d. “Which Concept of Concept for Conceptual Engineering?” Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Scientific Philosophy 88 (5): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00447-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorem, Sigurd. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering and the Implementation Problem.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2): 186–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1809514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, David. 1978. “Dthat.” In Syntax and Semantics, edited by Peter Cole, 221–243. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, Steffen. 2020. “There Is No Dilemma for Conceptual Engineering. Reply to Max Deutsch.” Philosophical Studies 178 (7): 2279–2291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01546-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripke, Saul A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebens, Samuel, and Aaron Segal. 2022. “Introduction to Special Issue on Jewish Analytic Theology.” Journal of Analytic Theology 10. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2022-10.110418180411.
   Google Scholar
• LoLordo, Antonia, ed. 2019. Persons: A History. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634384.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, Paul A., Jr. 2014. “Analytic Theology: A Summary, Evaluation, and Defense.” Modern Theology 30 (1): 32–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankowitz, Poppy. 2021. “How to Have a Metalinguistic Dispute.” Synthese 199 (3-4): 5603–5622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03038-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, Thomas H. 2021. Analytic Christology and the Theological Interpretation of the New Testament. 1st ed. Oxford Studies in Analytic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melo Lopes, Filipa. 2023. “What Do Incels Want? Explaining Incel Violence Using Beauvoirian Otherness.” Hypatia 38 (1): 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2023.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Richard B. 1986. “The Reference of “God”.” Faith and Philosophy 3 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil1986313.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1968. The Will to Power. Translated by Walter Arnold Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. Vintage. Books ed. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Gieblyn, Meghan. 2021. God, Human, Animal, Machine: Technology, Metaphor, and the Search for Meaning. 1st ed. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Carl, ed. 2007. Celibacy and Religious Traditions. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306316.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Oviedo, Lluís. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence and Theology: Looking for a Positive—but Not Uncritical—Reception.” Zygon 57 (4): 938–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12832.
   Google Scholar
• Panchuk, Michelle, and Michael Rea, eds. 2020. Voices from the Edge: Centring Marginalized Perspectives in Analytic Theology. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinder, Mark. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering, Metasemantic Externalism and Speaker-Meaning.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 130 (517): 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett, David. 2015. “Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Methodology of Philosophy.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8): 828–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2015.1080184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett, David. 2016. “Conceptual History, Conceptual Ethics, and the Aims of Inquiry: A Framework for Thinking About the Relevance of the History/Genealogy of Concepts to Normative Inquiry.” Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 3 (2): 27–64. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.002.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell. 2013. “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (23): 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell. 2021. “Metalinguistic Negotiation and Speaker Error.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2): 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2019.1610055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl R. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, Kayla, Michael Halpin, and Finlay Maguire. 2021. “The Black Pill: New Technology and the Male Supremacy of Involuntarily Celibate Men.” Men and Masculinities 24 (5): 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X211017954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hillary. 1975. “The Meaning of “Meaning”.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7: 131–193.
   Google Scholar
• Queloz, Matthieu, and Friedemann Bieber. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering and the Politics of Implementation.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (3): 670–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea, Michael C. 2020. “The Metaphysics of Original Sin.” In Essays in Analytic Theology, edited by Michael C. Rea, 13–52. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866817.003.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, Michael C. 2022. “Analytic Theology.” In St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, edited by Brendan N. Wolfe. St Andrews: University of St Andrews. https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/AnalyticTheology.
   Google Scholar
• Recanati, François. 2002. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodkey, Christopher D., and Jordan E. Miller. 2018. The Palgrave Handbook of Radical Theology. Cham: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rutledge, Jonathan Curtis. 2021. “Separating the Theological Sheep from the Philosophical Goats.” Journal of Analytic Theology 9: 205–222. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2021-1.3540-39434630.
   Google Scholar
• Saemi, Amir, and Scott A. Davison. 2020. “Salvific Luck in Islamic Theology.” Journal of Analytic Theology 8: 120–130. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2020-8.180008030013.
   Google Scholar
• Saner, Emine. 2023. “The Rise of Voluntary Celibacy: “Most of the Sex I’ve Had, I Wish I Hadn’t Bothered”’.” The Guardian, April 26, 2023, sec. Life and style. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2023/apr/26/the-rise-of-voluntary-celibacy-most-of-the-sex-ive-had-i-wish-i-hadnt-bothered.
   Google Scholar
• Scharp, Kevin. 2007. “Replacing Truth.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (6): 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701698589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, Kevin. 2013. Replacing Truth. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
   Google Scholar
• Scharp, Kevin. 2019. “Replies to Bacon, Eklund, and Greenough on Replacing Truth.” Inquiry 62 (4): 422–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1420012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, Kevin. 2021. “Philosophy as the Study of Defective Concepts.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Herman Cappelen, Alexis Burgess, and David Plunkett, 396–416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, Stephen. 1996. “Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1): 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/96.1.317.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, Stephen. 2003. The Things We Mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, Stephen. 2004. “Skepticism and the Vagaries of Justified Belief.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 119 (1/2): 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000029355.63475.9d.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 1978. “Literal Meaning.” Erkenntnis 13 (1): 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160894.
   Google Scholar
• Sider, Theodore. 2009. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by David Chalmers, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, 384–423. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, Peter F. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, Peter F. 1963. “Carnap’s Views on Conceptual Systems Versus Natural Languages in Analytic Philosophy.” In The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, 503–518. Open Court: La Salle.
   Google Scholar
• Stump, Eleonore. 2018. Atonement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarski, Alfred. 1944. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (3): 341–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 1975. Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 2017. “Metaphysical Disputes and Metalinguistic Negotiation.” Analytic Philosophy 58 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. n.d. “Conceptual Engineering: When Do We Need It? How Can We Do It?” Inquiry, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.2000118.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, Andrew. 2019. “The Possibility of a Scientific Approach to Analytic Theology.” Journal of Analytic Theology 7: 178–198. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2019-7.001322191404.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, Andrew B. 2023. Accountability to God. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, Charles. 1985. “On What Is Strictly Speaking True.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (2): 187–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1985.10716416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis, Charles. 2008. Occasion-Sensitivity: Selected Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Jamie Benjamin. 2022. “An Epistemic Defeater for Islamic Belief? Not So.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (1): 123–142. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visala, Aku. 2016. “What Does Theology Have to Do with Evidence? Exploring Analytic Theology and Epistemology.” Journal of Analytic Theology 4: 317–331. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2016-4.001020210800a.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, William. 2021a. Analytic Theology and the Academic Study of Religion, Oxford Studies In Analytic Theology. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779872.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, William. 2021b. “What Is Analytic Theology?” In Analytic Theology and the Academic Study of Religion, edited by William Wood, 48–78. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779872.003.0005.
   Google Scholar