Publication Cover
Inquiry
An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy
Latest Articles
100
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reasoning from the impossible: early medieval views on conditionals and counterpossibles

Received 15 Nov 2023, Accepted 28 Jan 2024, Published online: 05 Feb 2024

References

Primary literature

  • Abelard, Peter. 1970. Dialectica. Ed. Lambertus Marie de Rijk. Assen: Van Gorcum.
  • Alighieri, Dante. 1979. Monarchia. Opere minori, III, 1. Ed. Bruno Nardi. Milan: Ricciardi.
  • Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. 1969. “De hypotheticis syllogismis.” In Logicalia: Testi Classici Di Logica, edited by Luca Orbetello. Brescia: Paideia.
  • Buridan, John. 2015. Treatise on consequences. Transl. Stephen Read. Medieval Philosophy: Texts and Studies. New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Burley, Walter. 1980. De consequentiis. Edited in Green-Pedersen, Niels Jørgen. “Walter Burley’s ‘De consequentiis.’ An edition.” Franciscan Studies 40 (1980): 102–166.
  • Burley, Walter. 2000. On the Purity of the Art of Logic: The Shorter and the Longer Treatises. Transl. Paul Spade. Yale Library of Medieval Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Henry of Ghent. 2011. Syncategoremata Henrico de Gandavo adscripta. Ed. H.A.G. Braakhuis, Girard Etzkorn, and Gordon A. Wilson. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
  • Matthew of Orléans. 2001. Sophistaria sive summa communium distinctionum circa sophismata accidentium. Ed. Joke Spruyt. Leiden: Brill.
  • Neckam, Alexander. 1863. De naturis rerum. Ed. Thomas Wright. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts and Green.
  • Paul of Venice. 2002. Logica parva. First critical edition from the manuscripts with an introduction and commentary by Alan R. Perreiah. Leiden: Brill.
  • Peter of Spain. 1992. Syncategoreumata. Ed. Lambertus Marie de Rijk and transl. Joke Spruyt. Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, Bd. 30. Leiden: Brill.
  • Peter of Spain. 2014. Summaries of Logic. Transl. Brian P. Copenhaver, Calvin Normore and Terence Parsons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Roger Bacon. 2009. The Art and Science of Logic. Transl. Thomas S. Maloney. Mediaeval Sources in Translation 47. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
  • Stephen Langton. 2014. Quaestiones theologiae. Liber I. Ed. Riccardo Quinto and Magdalena Bieniak. Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi 22. Oxford: Oxford University Press, for the British Academy.

Secondary literature

  • Berto, Francesco, Rohan French, Graham Priest, and David Ripley. 2018. “Williamson on Counterpossibles.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (4): 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-017-9446-x
  • Berto, Francesco, and Mark Jago. 2019. Impossible Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Binini, Irene. 2022. “Medieval Theories on the Conceivability of the Impossible: A Survey of impossible positio in ars obligatioria during the 13th–14th Centuries.” Noctua 10 (1): 1–47.
  • Bos, Egbert P., and Joke Spruyt. 2017. Anonymi introductiones montane maiores. Philosophes medievaux, vol. LXIII. Leuven: Peeters.
  • Courtenay, William J. 1993. Nominales and rules of inference. In Jacobi 1993, 153–160.
  • De Rijk, Lambertus Marie. 1967. Logica Modernorum: A Contribution to the History of Early Terminist Logic. 2. The Origin and Early Development of the Theory of Supposition. Assen: Van Gorcum.
  • De Rijk, Lambertus Marie. 1974. “Some Thirteenth Century Tracts on the Game of Obligation.” Vivarium 12 (2): 94–123. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853474X00106
  • De Rijk, Lambertus Marie, ed. 1988. Some earlier Parisian tracts on distinctiones sophismatum: an edition with an introduction and indexes. Artistarium 7. Nijmegen: Ingenium.
  • D’Ors, Ángel. 1990. “Ex impossibili sequitur quodlibet” (Walter Burley). Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 57: 121–154.
  • Frege, Gotlobb. 1980. Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Ed. B.F. McGuinness and trans. Hans Kaal. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Iwakuma, Yukio. 1993. Parvipontani’s thesis ex impossibili quidlibet sequitur: Comments on the sources of the thesis from the twelfth century. In Jacobi 1993, 123–133.
  • Iwakuma, Yukio. 2013. “Alberic of Paris on Mont Ste Geneviève against Peter Abelard.” In Logic and Language in the Middle Ages, edited by Jakob Leth Fink, Heine Hansen, and Ana María Mora-Marquez, 27–47. Leiden: Brill.
  • Jacobi, Klaus, ed. 1993. Argumentationstheorie: Scholastische Forschungen zu den logischen und semantischen Regeln korrekten Folgerns. Leiden: Brill.
  • Lenzen, Wolfgang. 2021. “What Follows from the Impossible: Everything or Nothing? (An Interpretation of the ‘Avranches Text’ and the Ars Meliduna).” History and Philosophy of Logic 43: 1–23.
  • Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Marenbon, John. 2008. “The Latin Tradition of Logic to 1100.” In Handbook of the History of Logic, Vol. 2. edited by Dov M. Gabbay, and John Woods, 1–63 North Holland: Elsevier.
  • Martin, Christopher J. 2004. “Logic.” In The Cambridge Companion to Abelard, edited by Jeffrey E. Brower, and Kevin Guilfoy, 158–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martin, Christopher J. 2018. “The Theory of Natural Consequence.” Vivarium 56 (3–4): 340–366. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685349-12341357
  • Martin, Christopher J. 2022a. “Generaliter de nullo enuntiabili aliquid scio”: Meaning and Propositional Content in the Ars Meliduna.” In Thinking and Calculating: Essays in Logic, its History and its Philosophical Applications in Honour of Massimo Mugnai, edited by Francesco Ademollo, Fabrizio Amerini, and Vincenzo De Risi, Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 54, 103–125. Cham: Springer.
  • Martin, Christopher J. 2022b. “If One of the Two Disjuncts follows, then the Disjunction does.” The invention of addition in the twelfth century. Paper presented at the conference ‘Peter Abelard and his network’, October 12–14, in Venice, Italy.
  • McLoone, Brian, Cassandra Grützner, and Michael T. Stuart. 2023. “Counterpossibles in Science: An Experimental Study.” Synthese 201 (1): 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-04014-0
  • Nolan, Daniel. 1997. “Impossible Worlds: A Modest Approach.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38: 535–572.
  • Nolan, Daniel. 2014. “Hyperintensional Metaphysics.” Philosophical Studies 171 (1): 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0251-2.
  • Pelizzari, Stefano. 2020. “Intemptatas ab aliis ostendere veritates.” Dante’s use of logic in the Monarchia. Digital Dante. New York: Columbia University Libraries. https://digitaldante.columbia.edu/pelizzari-logic/ (accessed January 24, 2024).
  • Stalnaker, Robert. 1968. “A Theory of Conditionals.” In Studies in Logical Theory, edited by Nicholas Rescher, American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph 2, 98–112. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Spruyt, Joke. 1993. Thirteenth-century positions on the rule “ex impossibili sequitur quidlibet”. In Jacobi 1993, 161–193.
  • Williamson, T. 2017. “Counterpossibles in Semantics and Metaphysics.” Argumenta 2 (2): 195–226.
  • Wilson, A. 2021. “Counterpossible Reasoning in Physics.” Philosophy of Science 88 (5): 1113–1124. https://doi.org/10.1086/714706

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.