Conceptual engineering and the dynamics of linguistic intervention

References

• Andow, J. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering is Extremely Unlikely to Work: So What?” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2): 212–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, D. 2023. “Conceptual Engineering Between Representational Skepticism and Complacency: Is There a Third Way?” Topoi, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09924-3.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., R. Faris, and H. Roberts. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bermúdez, J. L. 2017. “Defining ‘Harm’ in the Tuvel Affair.” Inside Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. 2019. ““Fake News” and Conceptual Ethics.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 16 (2): 144–154. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v16i2.648.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. 2021. “Regulating the Spread of Online Misinformation.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology, edited by M. Hannon, and J. de Ridder, 214–225. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cantalamessa, E. A. 2021. “Disability Studies, Conceptual Engineering, and Conceptual Activism.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2): 46–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H., and D. Plunkett. 2020. “A Guided Tour of Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by H. Cappelen, D. Plunkett, and A. Burgess, 1–26. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Case, S. 2019. ‘The Boy Who Inflated the Concept of ‘Wolf’’, Quillette.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. 2020. “What is Conceptual Engineering and What Should it Be?” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1817141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. 2020. “Speaker’s Reference, Stipulation, and a Dilemma for Conceptual Engineers.” Philosophical Studies 177 (12): 3935–3957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01416-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: The Power and Ethics of Knowing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, A. F. 2022. “‘Rational Conceptual Conflict and the Implementation Problem.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1080/002174X.2022.2037455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, A. F. 2023. “Bullshit in Politics Pays.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche, https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2023.3.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, A. 2014. “Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2): 135–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habgood-Coote, J. 2019. “‘Stop Talking About Fake News!.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (9-10): 1033–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habgood-Coote, J. 2022. “Fake News, Conceptual Engineering, and Linguistic Resistance: Reply to Pepp, Michaelson, and Sterken, and Brown.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (4): 488–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, N. 2016. “Concept Creep: Psychology’s Expanding Concepts of Harm and Pathology.” Psychological Inquiry 27 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1082418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, M. G. 2021. “What Should Conceptual Engineering Be All About?” Philosophia 5: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, M. G. 2023. “Which Concept of Concept for Conceptual Engineering?” Erkenntnis 88 (5): 2145–2169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00447-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, M. G., S. Koch, and R. Nefdt. 2022. “Conceptual Engineering: A Road Map to Practice.” Philosophy Compass, https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isern-Mas, C. 2023. “Implementing Conceptual Engineering: Lessons from Social Movements.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2023.2253274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K. 2016. “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman.” Ethics 126 (2): 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1086/683535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorem, S. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering and the Implementation Problem.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2): 186–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorem, S. 2022. “The Good, The Bad, and the Insignificant – Assessing Concept Functions for Conceptual Engineering.” Synthese 200 (2): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03548-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorem, S., and G. Löhr. 2022. “Inferentialist Conceptual Engineering.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2062045.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, S. 2021. “Engineering What? On Concepts in Conceptual Engineering.” Synthese 199 (1-2): 1955–1975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02868-w.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, S. 2024. “The Anti-Conceptual Engineering Argument and the Problem of Implementation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 61 (1): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521123.61.1.06.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, S., G. Löhr, and M. Pinder. 2023. “Recent Work in the Theory of Conceptual Engineering.” Analysis, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anad032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslow, A. 2022. “Meaning Change and Changing Meaning.” Synthese 200 (94): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03563-8.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, E. forthcoming. “How Language Teaches and Misleads: “Coronavirus” and “Social Distancing” as Case Studies.” In New Perspectives on Conceptual Engineering, edited by M. G. Isaac, K. Scharp, and S. Koch.
   Google Scholar
• Lindauer, M. 2020. “Conceptual Engineering as Concept Preservation.” Ratio 33 (3): 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., and C. S. Taber. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Löhr, G. 2021. “Commitment Engineering: Conceptual Engineering Without Representations.” Synthese 199 (5-6): 13035–13052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03365-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löhr, G. 2022. “Linguistic Interventions and the Ethics of Conceptual Disruption.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10321-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löhr, G., and C. Michel. 2023. “Conceptual Engineering, Predictive Processing, and A New Implementation Problem.” Mind & Language, https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machery, E. 2021. “A New Challenge to Conceptual Engineering.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1967190.
   Google Scholar
• Nado, J. 2021. “Classification Procedures as the Targets of Conceptual Engineering.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 106 (1): 136–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neufeld, E. forthcoming. “Engineering Social Concepts: Lessons from the Science of Categorization.” In Social Hierarchy, edited by S. Haslanger, K. Jones, F. Schroeter, and L. Schroeter. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pepp, J., Michaelson, E., and Sterken, R. (2019) ‘Why We Should Keep Talking About Fake News’, Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (4): 471-487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder, M. 2022. “Is Haslanger’s Ameliorative Project a Successful Conceptual Engineering Project?” Synthese, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03803-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett, D., and T. Sundell. 2013. “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.” Philosopher’s Imprint 13 (23): 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podosky, P. M. C. 2022. “Can Conceptual Engineering Actually Promote Social Justice?” Synthese 200 (160): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03469-5.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. 2019. “Conceptual Engineering and Semantic Deference.” Studia Philosophica Estonica 12: 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, J. 2021. “Deflating the Functional Turn in Conceptual Engineering.” Synthese 199 (3-4): 11555–11586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03302-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul, J. 2018. “Dogwhistles, Political Manipulation, and Philosophy of Language.” In New Work on Speech Acts, edited by D. Fogal, D. W. Harris, and M. Moss, 360–383. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, M. 2021. “Conceptual Domination.” Synthese 199 (5-6): 15043–15067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03454-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, I., and A. Shaw. 2022. “When and Why “Staying Out Of It” Backfires in Moral and Political Disagreements.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simion, M., and C. Kelp. 2019. “Conceptual Innovation, Function First.” Nous (Detroit, Mich ) 54 (4): 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterken, R. 2020. “Linguistic Interventions and Transformative Communicative Disruptions.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by H. Cappelen, D. Plunkett, and A. Burgess, 417–434. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. 2018. Talk: The Science of Communication. London, UK: Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. 2020. “A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by H. Cappelen, D. Plunkett, and A. Burgess, 435–458. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tirell, L. 2012. “Genocidal Language Games.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech, edited by I. Maitra, and M. McGowan, 174–221. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traldi, O. 2024. Political Beliefs: A Philosophical Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuvel, R. 2017. “In Defense of Transracialism.” Hypatia 32 (2): 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. 2022. “Neoliberalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, and Uri Nodelman, Winter 2022 Edition, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/neoliberalism/.
   Google Scholar
• Venugopal, R. 2015. “Neoliberalism as Concept.” Economy and Society 44 (2): 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1013356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, S. D. 2017. “Academe’s Poisonous Call-Out Culture.” The Chronicle of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar