References

• Anlló, H., Becchio, J., & Sackur, J. (2017). French norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 65(2), 241–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2017.1276369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnier, A. J. (2002). Posthypnotic amnesia for autobiographical episodes: A laboratory model of functional amnesia? Psychological Science, 13(3), 232–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2004). Defining and identifying the highly hypnotizable person. In M. Heap, R. J. Brown, & D. A. Oakley (Eds.), The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues (pp. 30–61). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnier, A. J., McConkey, K. M., & Wright, J. (2004). Posthypnotic amnesia for autobiographical episodes: Influencing memory accessibility and quality. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52(3), 260–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020714049052351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, N., Petrić, D., Boase, C., Lane, J., Zgomba, M., Dahl, C., & Kaiser, A. (2003). Mosquitoes and their control (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(1), 48–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benham, G., Smith, N., & Nash, M. R. (2002). Hypnotic susceptibility scales: Are the mean scores increasing? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 50(1), 5–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140208410087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P., & Hilgard, E. R. (1963). A comparison of group and individual induction of hypnosis with self-scoring and observer-scoring. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11(1), 49–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146308409227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentler, P., & Roberts, M. R. (1963). Hypnotic susceptibility assessed in large groups. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11(2), 93–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146308409232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergman, M., Trenter, E., & Kallio, S. (2003). Swedish norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51(4), 348–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.51.4.348.16414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S.-J., Oakley, D., & Frith, C. (2003). Delusions of alien control in the normal brain. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 1058–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongartz, W. (1985). German norms for the Harvard roup scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 33(2), 131–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148508406643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, R. G., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Volunteer bias in hypnotic experimentation. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 5(1), 49–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1962.10401928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. A., & Mallard, D. (2003). Seeing is believing: The reality of hypnotic hallucinations. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(2), 219–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. A., & McConkey, K. M. (1999). Functional blindness: A construction of cognitive and social influences. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 4(3), 227–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/135468099395945
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, C. (2013). Portuguese norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 61(2), 219–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2013.753833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R., & Barnier, A. (2003). Posthypnotic amnesia for a first romantic relationship: Forgetting the entire relationship versus forgetting selected events. Memory, 11(3), 307–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, D., Montgomery, G., & Holdevici, I. (2003). Romanian norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51(1), 66–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.51.1.66.14066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pascalis, V., Russo, P., & Marucci, F. S. (2000). Italian norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48(1), 44–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derbyshire, S. W., Whalley, M. G., & Oakley, D. A. (2009). Fibromyalgia pain and its modulation by hypnotic and non‐hypnotic suggestion: An fMRI analysis. European Journal of Pain, 13(5), 542–550. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derbyshire, S. W., Whalley, M. G., Stenger, V. A., & Oakley, D. A. (2004). Cerebral activation during hypnotically induced and imagined pain. Neuroimage, 23(1), 392–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner, T., Jamieson, G., & Gruzelier, J. (2005). Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe. Neuroimage, 27(4), 969–978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63(1), 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2014.961870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldt, L. S. (1965). The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty. Psychometrika, 30(3), 357–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldt, L. S. (1969). A test of the hypothesis that cronbach’s alpha or kuder-richardson coefficent twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika, 34(3), 363–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., & Lynn, S. J. (2010). Hypnotic responsiveness: Expectancy, attitudes, fantasy proneness, absorption, and gender. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59(1), 103–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.522914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1953). The correlation of an item with a composite of the remaining items in a test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13(1), 87–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001316445301300109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, P., Cartledge, P., Dafydd, M., & Oakley, D. A. (2004). Anomalous control: When ‘free-will’ is not conscious. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(3), 646–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauke, J., & Kossowski, T. (2011). Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae, 30(2), 87–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1
   Google Scholar
• Henrysson, S. (1963). Correction of item-total correlations in item analysis. Psychometrika, 28(2), 211–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. Oxford, England: Harcourt: Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Hofbauer, R. K., Rainville, P., Duncan, G. H., & Bushnell, M. C. (2001). Cortical representation of the sensory dimension of pain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86(1), 402–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.1.402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. (1941). Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance. Psychometrika, 6(3), 153–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289270
   Google Scholar
• Iani, C., Ricci, F., Gherri, E., & Rubichi, S. (2006). Hypnotic suggestion modulates cognitive conflict: The case of the flanker compatibility effect. Psychological Science, 17(8), 721–727. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01772.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, S. P., & Ihamuotila, M. J. (1999). Finnish norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47(3), 227–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149908410034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. (2006). Measurement of involuntariness in hypnotic response. Retrieved from https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~jfkihlstrom/hypnosis_involuntariness.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (1992). Hypnosis: A sesquicentennial essay. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40(4), 301–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149208409663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F., & Register, P. A. (1984). Optimal scoring of amnesia on the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 32(1), 51–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148408416000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Költő, A., Gősi-Greguss, A. C., Varga, K., & Bányai, É. I. (2015). Hungarian norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63(3), 309–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2015.1031549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Costantini-Ferrando, M. F., Alpert, N. M., & Spiegel, D. (2000). Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(8), 1279–1284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamas, J. R., Valle-Inclan, F. D., Blanco, M. J., & Diaz, A. A. (1989). Spanish norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37(3), 264–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148908414477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, J.-R., & Perry, C. (1982). Montreal norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 30(2), 167–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148208407381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E. L., & D’abrera, H. (1975). Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, P. (2008). Israeli norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 56(4), 384–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140802255385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, G., Rotriquenz, E., Carvalho, C., Vannucci, M., Roberts, K., & Kirsch, I. (2009). Suggested visual hallucinations in and out of hypnosis. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(2), 494–499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, A., Chalamish, Y., Solomonovich, A., & Dudai, Y. (2008). Mesmerizing memories: Brain substrates of episodic memory suppression in posthypnotic amnesia. Neuron, 57(1), 159–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. J. (1975). Response to the Ponzo illusion as a reflection of hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 23(2), 148–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147508415939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, M. R., & Barnier, A. J. (2012). The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, M. R., Lynn, S. J., & Stanley, S. M. (1984). The direct hypnotic suggestion of altered mind/body perception. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27(2), 95–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1984.10402863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D. A. (2006). Hypnosis as a tool in research: Experimental psychopathology. Contemporary Hypnosis, 23(1), 3–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1557-0711
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2013). Hypnotic suggestion: Opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8), 565–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, R. A., & Green, J. P. (2007). An update on age, hypnotic suggestibility, and gender: A brief report. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 49(4), 283–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2007.10524505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Nadon, R., & Button, J. (1992). The measurement of hypnotic ability. In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 459–490). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, B., Geiger, E., Prade, T., Vogel, S., & Piesbergen, C. (2015). Norms of German adolescents for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63(1), 92–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2014.961877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, B., Hagl, M., Bazijan, A., & Piesbergen, C. (2011). Hypnotic suggestibility and adult attachment. Contemporary Hypnosis and Integrative Therapy, 28(3), 171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, B., Vogel, S. E., Prade, T., Geiger, E., Mohl, J. C., & Piesbergen, C. (2014). Hypnotizability, personality style, and attachment: An exploratory study, part 1—general results. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(1), 13–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2014.906152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainville, P., Duncan, G. H., Price, D. D., Carrier, B., & Bushnell, M. C. (1997). Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science, 277(5328), 968–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainville, P., Hofbauer, R. K., Paus, T., Duncan, G. H., Bushnell, M. C., & Price, D. D. (1999). Cerebral mechanisms of hypnotic induction and suggestion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(1), 110–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, P. H. (1989). Critical values for Spearman’s rank order correlation. Journal of Educational Statistics, 14(3), 245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, A., Kirsch, I., Pollard, J., & Nitkin-Kaner, Y. (2006). Suggestion reduces the stroop effect. Psychological Science, 17(2), 91–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01669.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, A., Shapiro, T., Fan, J., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(12), 1155–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roark, J. B., Barabasz, A. F., Barabasz, M., & Lin-Roark, I. H. (2012). An investigation of Taiwanese norms for the stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale: Form C (Mandarin Chinese Translation) — SHSS:C (MCT). International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60(2), 160–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2012.648062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudski, J. M., Marra, L. C., & Graham, K. R. (2004). Sex differences on the HGSHS:A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52(1), 39–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.52.1.39.23924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, P. W., & McConkey, K. M. (1979). Australian norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27(3), 294–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147908407568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1963). Norms on the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11(1), 39–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146308409226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siuta, J. (2010). Polish norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 58(4), 433–443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2010.499345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel, D., Bierre, P., & Rootenberg, J. (1989). Hypnotic alteration of somatosensory perception. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 146(6), 749–754. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.146.6.749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel, H., & Spiegel, D. (2008). Trance and treatment: Clinical uses of hypnosis. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• SPSS. (2011). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 20.0. New York, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Staudacher, M., Hagl, M., Piesbergen, C., & Peter, B. (2012). Sind Hypnotisierbarkeit und Bindung doch unkorreliert? Bericht über einen Replikationsversuch [Are hypnotizability and attachment not correlated after all? Report on a replication]. Hypnose-ZHH, 7, 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Szechtman, H., Woody, E., Bowers, K. S., & Nahmias, C. (1998). Where the imaginal appears real: A positron emission tomography study of auditory hallucinations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(4), 1956–1960. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.4.1956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A., & Hilgard, E. (1959). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scales, forms A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we need and how should we use them. In A. J. Barnier & M. R. Nash (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 255–282). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zachariae, R., Sommerlund, B., & Molay, F. (1996). Danish norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44(2), 140–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149608416076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, A. B., & Wang, Z. D. (2011). The reliability and validity of Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A (HGSHS-A) Chinese version in college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25(3), 223–227.
   Google Scholar