References

• Arrindell, W. A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemann, M., … van der Ende, J. (1999). The development of a short form of the EMBU: Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(4), 613–628. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00192-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachner-Melman, R., & Lichtenberg, P. (2001). Freud’s relevance to hypnosis: A reevaluation. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44(1), 37–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2001.10403454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bányai, É. I. (1991). Toward a social-psychobiological model of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 564–598). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bányai, É. I. (2008a). A hipnoterápia mint önálló pszichoterápiás modalitás [Hypnotherapy as an independent modality of psychotherapy]. In É. Bányai & L. Benczúr (Eds.), A hipnózis és a hipnoterápia alapjai [The foundations of hypnosis and hypnotherapy] (pp. 543–558). Budapest, Hungary: ELTE Eötvös Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Bányai, É. I. (2008b). A hipnózis szociál-pszichobiológiai modellje [The social-psychobiological model of hypnosis]. In É. Bányai & L. Benczúr (Eds.), A hipnózis és a hipnoterápia alapjai [The foundations of hypnosis and hypnotherapy] (pp. 379–445). Budapest, Hungary: ELTE Eötvös Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Bányai, É. I., Gősi-Greguss, A. C., Vágó, P., Varga, K., & Horváth, R. (1990). Interactional approach to the understanding of hypnosis: Theoretical background and main findings. In R. Van Dyck, P. Spinhoven, A. J. W. Van der Does, Y. R. Van Rood, & W. De Moor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Current theory, research and practice (pp. 53–69). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Free University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bányai, É. I., Varga, K., & Gősi-Greguss, A. C. (2001). Szuggesztív egyéniségek: Archaikus bevonódás tanárok és hipnotizőrök hatására [Suggestive individuals: Archaic involvement to teachers and hypnotists]. In C. Pléh, J. László, & A. Oláh (Eds.), Tanulás, kezdeményezés, alkotás: Barkóczi Ilona 75. születésnapjára [Learning, Initiative, Creation: To the 75th Birtday of Ilona Barkóczi] (pp. 313–336). Budapest, Hungary: ELTE Eötvös Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2004). Defining and identifying the highly hypnotizable person. In M. Heap, R. J. Brown, & D. A. Oakley (Eds.), The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues (pp. 30–61). Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benham, G., Smith, N., & Nash, M. R. (2002). Hypnotic susceptibility scales: Are the mean scores iancreasing? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 50(1), 5–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140208410087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1963). A comparison of group and individual induction of hypnosis with selfscoring and observer-scoring. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11(1), 49–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146308409227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonshtein, U. (2012). Relational hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60(4), 397–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2012.700613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. S. (1993). The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Normative and comparative data. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41(1), 35–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149308414536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. S. (1998). Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C: Manual and response booklet. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46(3), 250–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149808410006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1979/2005). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, F., Zaborskis, A., Tabak, I., Carmen Granado Alcon, M. D., Zemaitiene, N., de Roos, S., & Klemera, E. (2015). Trends in adolescents’ perceived parental communication across 32 countries in Europe and North America from 2002 to 2010. European Journal of Public Health, 25(2), 46–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. P., & Fromm, E. (1986). Hypnotherapy and hypnoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, L. D., Duran, R. E., Jasiukaitis, P., Koopman, C., & Spiegel, D. (1996). Hypnotizability and traumatic experience: A diathesis-stress model of dissociative symptomatology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153(7), 42–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.153.8.A42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., & Terhune, D. B. (2009). A note of caution on the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 57(2), 222–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140802665484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, C., Kirsch, I., Mazzoni, G., & Leal, I. (2008). Portuguese norms for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 56(3), 295–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140802041850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernick, M. R. (2008). Bootstrap methods: A guide for practitioners and researchers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Council, J. R. (1993). Context effects in personality research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(2), 31–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770636
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(397), 171–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisen, M. R. (1993). Psychoanalytic and psychodynamic models of hypnoanalysis. In J. W. Rhue, S. J. Lynn, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Handbook of clinical hypnosis (pp. 123–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faymonville, M.-E., Boly, M., & Laureys, S. (2006). Functional neuroanatomy of the hypnotic state. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 99(4–6), 463–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gősi-Greguss, A. C., Bányai, É. I., & Varga, K. (2010). Does the voice of the subject under hypnosis keep pace with the hypnotist, or is it a function of the hypnotic state? An acoustical analysis. Hypnos: Swedish Journal of Hypnosis in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, 5(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gruzelier, J. H. (2006). Frontal functions, connectivity and neural efficiency underpinning hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility. Contemporary Hypnosis, 23(1), 15–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.35
   Google Scholar
• Harman, C., Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. I. (1997). Distress and attention interactions in early infancy. Motivation and Emotion, 21(1), 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1974). Toward a neo-dissociation theory: Multiple cognitive controls in human functioning. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 17(3), 301–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1974.0061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, J. R. (1979). Personality and hypnosis: A study of imaginative involvement (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeft, F., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Haas, B. W., Bammer, R., Menon, V., & Spiegel, D. (2012). Functional brain basis of hypnotizability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(10), 1064–1072. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Költő, A. (2008). A hipnotikus fogékonyság dimenziói és a szülői nevelési stílus [Dimensions of hypnotic susceptibility and parental rearing style] (Unpublished Master’s thesis), Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Költő, A. (2015). Hypnotic susceptibility and mentalization skills in the context of parental behavior. (Doctoral (PhD) dissertation), Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. Retrieved from http://www.tinyurl.com/koltophd
   Google Scholar
• Költő, A., & Bányai, É. I. (2015). Az alexitímia és a hipnotikus fogékonyság összefüggése – Szakirodalmi áttekintés [The association between alexithymia and hypnotic susceptibility: A review of the literature]. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 16(1), 1–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1556/Mental.15.2014.004
   Google Scholar
• Költő, A., Gősi-Greguss, A. C., Varga, K., & Bányai, É. I. (2014). The influence of time and gender on Hungarian hypnotizability scores. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 61(1), 84–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2013.841487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Költő, A., Gősi-Greguss, A. C., Varga, K., & Bányai, É. I. (2015). Hungarian norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63(3), 309–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2015.1031549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., & Cummings, J. (1996). Trait factors, state effects, and hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44(3), 232–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149608416085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson-Hall, J. (2016). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. London, New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, P., Bachner-Melman, R., Ebstein, R. P., & Crawford, H. J. (2004). Hypnotic susceptibility: Multidimensional relationships with Cloninger’s tridimensional personality questionnaire, COMT polymorphisms, absorption, and attentional characteristics. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52(1), 47–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.52.1.47.23922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luminet, O., Grynberg, D., Ruzette, N., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011). Personality-dependent effects of oxytocin: Greater social benefits for high alexithymia scorers. Biological Psychology, 87(3), 401–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Rhue, J. W. (1988). Fantasy proneness: Hypnosis, developmental antecedents, and psychopathology. American Psychologist, 43(1), 35–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 496–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, M.R., & Spinler, D. (1989). Hypnosis and transference: A measure of archaic involvement. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37(2), 129–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148908410542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, M. R. (2008). A psychoanalytic theory of hypnosis: A clinically informed approach. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 201–224). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1982). The phenomenology of consciousness inventory. Thorndale, PA: Psychophenomenological Concepts.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1991). Quantifying consciousness: An empirical approach. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, B., Hagl, M., Bazijan, A., & Piesbergen, C. (2011). Hypnotic suggestibility and adult attachment. Contemporary Hypnosis and Integrative Therapy, 28, 171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2011). Brain states and hypnosis research. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(2), 325–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, A., Fan, J., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(28), 9978–9983. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503064102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, A., Shapiro, T., Fan, J., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of stroop interference. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(12), 1155–1161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.12.1155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhue, J. W. (2004). Developmental determinants of high hypnotizability. In M. Heap, R. J. Brown, & D. A. Oakley (Eds.), The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues (pp. 115–132). Hove, United Kingdom: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rhue, J. W., & Lynn, S. J. (1987). Fantasy proneness: Developmental antecedents. Journal of Personality, 55(1), 121–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.1987.55.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1975/2009). The volunteer subject. In R. Rosenthal & R. L. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifacts in behavioral research: Robert Rosenthal and Ralph L. Rosnow’s classic books (pp. 669–862). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E. (1962). Three dimensions of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 10(1), 23–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146208415862
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, C. (1989). Szubjektív élmények különböző indukciós technikákkal létrehozott hipnózisokban [Subjective experiences induced by various hypnosis techniques]. (doctoral (PhD) dissertation), Kossuth Lajos Tudományegyetem Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Debrecen, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, C. (1993). The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: Comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41(3), 225–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149308414552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szekely, A., Kovacs-Nagy, R., Banyai, E. I., Gosi-Greguss, A. C., Varga, K., Halmai, Z., … Sasvari-Szekely, M. (2010). Association between hypnotizability and the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) polymorphism. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 58(3), 301–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207141003760827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. J., Bagby, R. M., & Parker, J. D. A. (1997). Disorders of affect regulation: Alexithymia in medical and psychiatric illness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tereno, S., Soares, I., Martins, C., Celani, M., & Sampaio, D. (2008). Attachment styles, memories of parental rearing and therapeutic bond: A study with eating disordered patients, their parents and therapists. European Eating Disorders Review, 16(1), 49–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, K. (2013). The phenomenology of hypnotic interactions. New York, NY: Nova Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Varga, K., Jozsa, E., Banyai, E. I., Gosi-Greguss, A. C., & Kumar, V. K. (2001). Phenomenological experiences associated with hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 49(1), 19–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140108410376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, K., & Kekecs, Z. (2014). Oxytocin and cortisol in the hypnotic interaction. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 62(1), 111–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2013.841494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman, O., Zagoory-Sharon, O., & Feldman, R. (2012). Intranasal oxytocin administration is reflected in human saliva. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(9), 1582–1586. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. D. (2011). Modern statistics for the social and behavioral sciences: A practical introduction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelinka, V., Cojan, Y., & Desseilles, M. (2013). Hypnosis, attachment, and oxytocin: An integrative perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 62(1), 29–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2013.841473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar