References

• Appelbaum, S. A. (1973). Psychological-mindedness: Word, concept and essence. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 54(1), 35–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austrin, H. R., & Pereira, M. J. (1978). Locus of control as a predictor of hypnotic susceptibility. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 20(3), 199–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1978.10403930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Calverly, D. S. (1964). Empirical evidence for a theory of “hypnotic” behavior: Effects of pretest instructions on response to primary suggestions. Psychological Record, 14(4), 457–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396019
   Google Scholar
• Benham, G., Woody, E. Z., Wilson, K. S., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Expect the unexpected: Ability, attitude, and responsiveness to hypnosis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 342–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braffman, W., & Kirsch, I. (2001). Reaction time as a predictor of imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability. Contemporary Hypnosis, 18(3), 107–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1557-0711
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, D. M., Spanos, N. P., & Barber, T. X. (1971). Augmenting hypnotic suggestibility by providing favorable information about hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 13(4), 259–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1971.10402122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Groot, H. P., Gwynn, M. I., & Spanos, N. P. (1988). The effects of contextual information and gender on the prediction of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1049–1053. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denollet, J., & Nyklicek, I. (2004). Psychological mindedness: A new index to assess a major emotion-focused coping style. In I. Nyklicek, L. Temoshok, & A. Vingerhoets (Eds.), Emotional expression and health: Advances in theory, assessment and clinical applications (pp. 185–203). New York, NY: Brunner- Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R. (2014). Hypnotic relaxation therapy: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R. (2017). Handbook of medical and psychological hypnosis: Foundations, applications, and professional issues. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA division 30 definition of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(4), 378–385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2015.1011465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. (1956). California psychological inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2001). Rethinking psychological mindedness: Metacognition, self-reflection, and insight. Behaviour Change, 18(1), 8–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.18.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A. (1992). Psychological-mindedness: A conceptual model. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46(1), 131–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1992.46.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kekecs, Z., Bowers, J., Johnson, A., Kendrick, C., & Elkins, G. (2016). The Elkins hypnotizability scale: Assessment of reliability and validity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 64(3), 285–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2016.1171089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., Silva, C. E., Comey, G., & Reed, S. (1995). A spectral analysis of cognitive and personality variables in hypnosis: Empirical disconfirmation of the two-factor model of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 167–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, P., Cooper, L. M., & Johnson, H. J. (1961). Subject characteristics in hypnosis research. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 10, 13–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146208415861
   Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M. (2008). Generations and landscapes of hypnosis: Questions we’ve asked, questions we should ask. In A. J. Barnier & M. R. Nash (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 21–52). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, R. T. (1980). Prediction of hypnotizability from personality variables of the California psychological inventory: A multiple regression analysis. Psychological Reports, 47(3), 1319–1322. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1980.47.3f.1319
   Google Scholar
• Melei, J. P., & Hilgard, E. R. (1964). Attitudes toward hypnosis, self-predictions and hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 12(2), 99–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146408409265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery, G. H., Duhamel, K. N., & Redd, W. H. (2000). A metaanalysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: How effective is hypnosis? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48(2), 138–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140008410045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Tasso, A. F. (2008). Clinical hypnosis: The empirical evidence. In A. J. Barnier & M. R. Nash (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 697–725). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyklicek, I., & Denollet, J. (2009). Development and evaluation of the balanced index of psychological mindedness (BIPM). Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 32–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Form A. Palo Alto, California, USA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. E., & Kirsch, I. (1992). Interpretive sets, expectancy, fantasy proneness, and dissociation as predictors of hypnotic response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 847–856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., Brett, P. J., Menary, E. P., & Cross, W. P. (1987). A measure of attitudes toward hypnosis: Relationships with absorption and hypnotic susceptibility. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30(2), 139–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1987.10404174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., & McPeake, J. D. (1975). Involvement in everyday imaginative activities, attitudes toward hypnosis, and hypnotic suggestibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 594–598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W. L. (2016). Guidelines for the use of hypnosis: When to use hypnosis and when not to use. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41(1), 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Higard, E. R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic suggestibility scale: Form C. Palo Axlto, California, USA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing & Health, 13(4), 227–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera, I. E., & Szlyk, J. P. (2003). Could empathy be a predictor of hypnotic ability? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51(4), 390–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.51.4.390.16413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanchar, R. J., & Johnson, H. J. (1981). Absorption and attitude toward hypnosis: A moderator analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29(4), 375–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148108409171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar