References
- Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS/Small Waters.
- Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men; Research in human relations (pp. 177–199). Oxford, UK: Carnegie Press.
- Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
- Aveling, F., & Hargreaves, H. L. (1921). Suggestibility with and without prestige in children. British Journal of Psychology, 12, 53–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1921.tb00038.x
- Baker, S. L., & Kirsch, I. (1993). Hypnotic and placebo analgesia: Order effects and the placebo label. Contemporary Hypnosis, 10(3), 117–126.
- Barber, T. X. (1959). Towards a theory of pain: Relief of chronic pain by prefrontal leucotomy, placebos, and hypnosis. Psychological Bulletin, 56(6), 430–460.
- Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473–481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/jcr.1989.15.issue-4
- Beaumont, M. (1987). Confessions, cautions, experts and the sub-normal after R vs Silcott and others. New Law Journal, 28, 807–814.
- Benham, G., Bowers, S., Nash, M. R., & Muechen, R. (1998). Self-fulfilling prophecy and hypnotic response are not the same thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1604–1613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1604
- Benham, G., Woody, E. Z., Wilson, K. S., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Expect the unexpected: Ability, aptitude, and responsiveness to hypnosis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 342–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.342
- Benjamin, L. T., Jr., & Simpson, J. A. (2009). The power of the situation: The impact of Milgram’s obedience studies on personality and social psychology. American Psychologist, 64(1), 12–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014077
- Benton, A. L., & Bandura, A. (1953). “Primary” and “secondary” suggestibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(3), 336–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055272
- Binet, A. (1900). La suggestibilite’. Paris, France: Schleicher.
- Blass, T. (2009). From new haven to Santa Clara: A historical perspective on the Milgram obedience experiments. American Psychologist, 64(1), 37–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014434
- Blass, T., & Schmitt, C. (2001). The nature of perceived authority in the Milgram Paradigm: Two replications. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 20(2), 115–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1019-y
- Bowers, K. S. (1983). Hypnosis for the seriously curious (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
- Brown, W. (1916). Individual and sex differences in suggestibility. University of California Psychology, 2(6), 291–430.
- Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64(1), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0010932
- Burtt, H. E. (1931). Legal psychology. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
- Cardeña, E., Lehmann, D., Faber, P. L., Jönsson, P., Milz, P., Pascual-Marqui, R. D., & Kochi, K. (2012). EEG sLORETA functional imaging during hypnotic arm levitation and voluntary arm lifting. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60(1), 31–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.622184
- Chae, Y., & Ceci, S. J. (2005). Individual differences in children’s recall and suggestibility: The effect of intelligence, temperament, and self-perceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(4), 383–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
- Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
- De Pascalis, V. (1989). Hypnotic susceptibility, alpha waves, and 40-Hz EEG rhythm, and personality. In V. A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H. J. Eysenck, & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research (pp. 221–239). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
- De Pascalis, V., Ray, W. J., Tranquillo, I., & D’Amico, D. (1998). EEG activity and heart rate during recall of emotional events in hypnosis: Relationships with hypnotizability and suggestibility. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29(3), 255–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(98)00009-9
- Drake, K. E. (2010a). Interrogative suggestibility: Life adversity, neuroticism, and compliance. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 493–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.030
- Drake, K. E. (2010b). The psychology of interrogative suggestibility: A vulnerability during interview. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 683–688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.005
- Drake, K. E., Bull, R., & Boon, J. C. W. (2008). Interrogative suggestibility, self-esteem, and the influence of negative life-events. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(2), 299–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/135532507X209981
- Duke, J. D. (1963). A study of the relationships between primary suggestibility, secondary suggestibility and placebo reactivity (Dissertation Abstracts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina.
- Edmonston, W. E. (1989). Conceptual clarification of hypnosis and its relationship to suggestibility. In V. A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H. J. Eysenck, & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research (pp. 69–78). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
- Elms, A. C. (2009). Obedience lite. American Psychologist, 64(1), 32–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014473
- Estabrooks, G. H. (1929). Experimental studies in suggestion. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 36(1), 120–139.
- Evans, F. J. (1989). The independence of suggestibility, placebo response, and hypnotizability. In V. A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H. J. Eysenck, & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research (pp. 145–154). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
- Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Eysenck, H. J., & Furneaux, W. D. (1945). Primary and secondary suggestibility: An experimental and statistical study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(6), 485–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054976
- Freud, S. (1910). The origin and development of psychoanalysis. American Journal of Psychology, 21(2), 181–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1413001
- Gheorghiu, V. A., Koch, E., Fialkovski, H., Peiper, W., & Molz, G. (2001). Factors influencing the illusion of warmth. Contemporary Hypnosis, 18(1), 21–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.213
- Grimes, F. V. (1948). An experimental analysis of the nature of suggestibility and of its relation to other psychological factors. In Studies in Psychology and Psychiatry from the Catholic University of America (vol. 7, no. 4, pp. vii, 45). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
- Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, P. R. (2000). Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(3), 303–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(84)90069-2
- Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987a). A parallel form the gudjonsson suggestibility scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(3), 215–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1987.tb01348.x
- Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987b). Historical background to suggestibility: How interrogative suggestibility differs from other types of suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 8(3), 347–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(87)90035-3
- Gudjonsson, G. H. (1988). The relationship of intelligence and memory to interrogative suggestibility: The importance of range effects. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(2), 185–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.1988.27.issue-2
- Gudjonsson, G. H. (1989). Compliance in an interrogative situation: A new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(5), 535–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(89)90035-4
- Gudjonsson, G. H. (1990). The relationship of intellectual skills to suggestibility, compliance, and acquiescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(3), 227–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90236-K
- Gudjonsson, G. H., & Clark, N. (1986). Suggestibility in police interrogation: A social psychological model. Social Behavior, 1(12), 83–104.
- Gudjonsson, G. H., & Young, S. (2010). Does confabulation in memory predict suggestibility beyond IQ and memory? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(1), 65–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.014
- Gwynn, M. I., & Spanos, N. P. (1996). Hypnotic responsiveness, nonhypnotic suggestibility, and responsiveness to social influence. In R. G. Kunzendorf, N. P. Spanos, & B. Wallace (Eds.), Hypnosis and imagination (pp. 147–175). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
- Halligan, P. W., & Oakley, D. A. (2014). Hypnosis and beyond: Exploring the broader domain of suggestion. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(2), 105–122.
- Hammer, A. G., Evans, F. J., & Bartlett, M. (1963). Factors in hypnosis and suggestion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(1), 15–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042587
- Hilgard, E. R. (1973). The domain of hypnosis, with some comments on alternative paradigms. American Psychologist, 28(11), 972–982. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035452
- Hilgard, E. R. (1991). Suggestibility and suggestions as related to hypnosis. In J. F. Schumaker (Ed.), Human Suggestibility: Advances in theory, research, and application (pp. 37–58). Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
- Holliday, R. E., Reyna, V. F., & Hayes, B. K. (2002). Memory processes underlying misinformation effects in child witnesses. Developmental Review, 22(1), 37–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2001.0534
- Hull, C. L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. New York, NY: Longmans, Green, and Co.
- Kihlstrom, J. F. (2003). Expecting that a treatment will be given when it won’t and knowing that a treatment is being given when it is. Prevention & Treatment, 6(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1522-3736.6.1.64c
- Kihlstrom, J. F. (2008). The domain of hypnosis, revisited. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 21–52). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Kirsch, I. (1985). Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behavior. American Psychologist, 40(11), 1189–1202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.11.1189
- Kirsch, I. (1997). Suggestibility or hypnosis: What do our scales really measure? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45(3), 212–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149708416124
- Kirsch, I. (2000). Hypnosis and placebos: Response expectancy as a mediator of suggestion effects. In V. De Pascalis, V. A. Gheorghiu, P. W. Sheehan, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research (Hypnosis International Monographs Number 4, pp. 229–243). Munich, Germany: M.E.G.-Stiftung
- Kirsch, I. (2010). The emperor’s new drugs: Exploding the antidepressant myth. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Kirsch, I., & Braffman, W. (2001). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 57–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00115
- Kirsch, I., & Council, J. R. (1992). Situational and personality correlates of hypnotic responsiveness. In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 267–291). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Kuyk, J., Spinhoven, P., & van Dyck, R. (1999). Hypnotic recall: A positive criterion in the differential diagnosis between epileptic and pseudo-epileptic seizures. Epilepsia, 40(4), 485–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.1999.40.issue-4
- Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. London, England: Harvard University Press.
- Lundh, L. G. (2000). Suggestion, suggestibility, and the placebo effect. In V. De Pascalis, V. A. Gheorghiu, P. W. Sheehan, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research (Hypnosis International Monographs Number 4, pp. 71–90). Stiftung, Munich, Germany: M.E.G.
- Lynn, S. J., Laurence, J.-R., & Kirsch, I. (2015). Hypnosis, suggestion, and suggestibility: An integrative model. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(3), 314–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2014.976783
- MacDougall, W. (1908). Introduction to social psychology. London, England: Methuen and Co.
- Maslow, A. H. (1939). Dominance, personality, and social behavior women. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 3–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713343
- Meyer, E. C., & Lynn, S. J. (2011). Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: Performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59(3), 327–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.570660
- Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
- Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18(1), 57–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676501800105
- Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York, NY: Harper.
- Moene, F. C., & Roelofs, K. (2008). Hypnosis in the treatment of conversion and somatization disorders. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 625–646). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Moerman, D. E. (2003). Doctors and patients: The role of the clinicians in the placebo effect. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 19(1), 14–22.
- Moore, R. K. (1964). Susceptibility to hypnosis and susceptibility to social influence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68(3), 282–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048401
- Moreno, M. I. C., Garcia, M. I. D., & Pareja, M. A. V. (1999). Cognitive factors in chronic pain. Psychology in Spain, 3(1), 75–87.
- Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17(11), 776–783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043424
- Otis, M. (1923). A study of suggestibility in children. Archives of Psychology, 11(70), 1–108.
- Parris, B. A. (2016). The prefrontal cortex and suggestion: Hypnosis vs placebo effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 415. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016
- Parris, B. A. (2017). The role of frontal executive functions in hypnosis and hypnotic suggestibility. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(2), 211–229.
- Pavlov, I. P. (1941). Lectures of conditioned reflexes, Vol. II. Conditioned reflexes and psychiatry. New York, NY: International Publishers.
- Pérez, N. A., Brown, S., Tasso, A. F., & Nash, M. R. (2004). Sensory suggestibility and hypnotic susceptibility: A confirmatory factor analysis. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Conference of the Society for Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, Santa Fe, NM.
- Peter, B., Schiebler, P., Piesbergen, C., & Hagl, M. (2012). Electromyographic investigation of hypnotic arm levitation: Differences between voluntary arm elevation and involuntary arm levitation. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 60(1), 88–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.622213
- Polczyk, R., & Pasek, T. (2006). Types of suggestibility: Relationships amongst compliance, indirect, and direct suggestibility. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 54(4), 392–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140600856764
- Roelofs, K., Hoogduin, K., Keijsers, G., Näring, G., Moene, F., & Sandijck, P. (2002). Hypnotic susceptibility in patients with conversion disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(2), 390–395. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.111.2.390
- Saltzstein, H. D., & Sandberg, L. (1975). The relative effectiveness of direct and indirect persuasion. Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 39–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915795
- Scott, W. D. (1910). Personal differences in suggestibility. Psychological Review, 17(2), 147–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071393
- Scullin, M. H., & Ceci, S. J. (2001). A suggestibility scale for children. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(5), 843–856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00077-5
- Sheiner, E. O., Lifshitz, M., & Raz, A. (2016). Placebo response correlates with hypnotic suggestibility. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(2), 146–153.
- Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York, NY: Harper.
- Shobe, K. K., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (2002). Interrogative suggestibility and “memory work”. In M. L. Eisen (Ed.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview. Personality and clinical psychology series (pp. 309–327). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Steele, C. M. (1971). The indirect and supererogatory indirect influence of a persuasive message (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University.
- Steele, C. M., & Ostrom, T. M. (1974). When is indirect persuasion more effective than direct persuasion? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(6), 737–741. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036212
- Stukát, K. G. (1958). Suggestibility: A factorial and experimental analysis. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
- Tasso, A. F., & Pérez, N. A. (2008). Parsing everyday suggestibility: What does it tell of about hypnosis? In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 283–309). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Trouton, D. S. (1957). Placebos and their psychological effects. Journal of Mental Science, 103(431), 344–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.103.431.344
- Turkkan, J. S. (1989). Classical conditioning: The new hegemony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 121–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024572
- Twenge, J. M. (2009). Change over time in obedience: The jury’s still out, but it might be decreasing. American Psychologist, 64(1), 28–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014475
- Wachtel, P. L. (2011). Therapeutic communication, knowing what to say when (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Wagstaff, G. F. (1991). Suggestibility: A social psychological approach. In J. F. Schumaker (Ed.), Human suggestibility (pp. 132–145). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Wagstaff, G. F. (2010). Hypnosis and the relationship between trance, suggestion, expectancy and depth: Some semantic and conceptual issues. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 53(1), 47–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2010.10401746
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Wells, G. L., & Loftus, E. F. (2003). Eyewitness memory for people and events. In A. Goldstein (Ed.), The handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 149–160). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Whalley, B., Hyland, M. E., & Kirsch, I. (2008). Consistency of the placebo effect. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(5), 537–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.11.007
- White, R. S. (1930). Motor suggestion in children. Child Development, 1(3), 161–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1125703
- Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes verses actions: The relationship between verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 41–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00619.x
- Wickramasekera, I. (1980). A conditioned response model of the placebo effect: Predictions from the model. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 5(1), 5–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999060
- Winkel, J. D., Younger, J. W., Tomcik, N., Borckardt, J. J., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Anatomy of a hypnotic response: Self-report estimates, actual behavior, and physiological response to the hypnotic suggestion for arm rigidity. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 54(2), 186–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140500528430
- Winkler, J. D., Kanouse, D. E., & Ware, J. E. (1982). Controlling for acquiescence response set in scale development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), 555–561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.555
- Woody, E. Z., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we need to know and how should we use them? In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 255–280). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Woody, E. Z., Drugovic, M., & Oakman, J. M. (1997). A reexamination of the role of nonhypnotic suggestibility in hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 399–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.399
- Wundt, W. M. (1892). Hypnotismus and suggestion. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.
- Younger, J. W., Rossetti, G. C., Borckardt, J. J., Smith, A. R., Tasso, A. F., & Nash, M. R. (2007). Hypnotizability and somatic complaints: A gender-specific phenomenon. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 55(1), 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140600995745