References
- Anlló, H., Becchio, J., & Sackur, J. (2017). French norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 65(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2017.1276369
- Balthazard, C. G. (1993). The hypnosis scales at their centenary: Some fundamental issues still unresolved. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149308414537
- Bányai, E. I., & Hilgard, E. R. (1976). A comparison of active-alert hypnotic induction with traditional relaxation induction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85(2), 218–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.85.2.218
- Barber, T. X. (1965). Measuring “hypnotic-like” suggestibility with and without “hypnotic induction”: Psychometric properties, norms, and variables influencing response to the Barber Suggestibility Scale (BSS). Psychological Reports, 16(3), 809–844. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.16.3.809
- Barber, T. X., & Wilson, S. C. (1978). The Barber Suggestibility Scale and the Creative Imagination Scale: Experimental and clinical applications. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21(2–3), 84–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1978.10403966
- Barnes, S. M., Lynn, S. J., & Pekala, R. J. (2009). Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: Individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses. Conscious Cognition, 18(1), 255–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.006
- Barnier, A. J., Dienes, Z., & Mitchell, C. J. (2008). How hypnosis happens: New cognitive theories of hypnotic responding. In M. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 141–178). Oxford University Press.
- Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2004). Defining and identifying the highly hypnotizable person. In M. Heap, R. J. Brown, & D. A. Oakley (Eds.), The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues (pp. 30–60). Brunner-Routledge.
- Barnier, A. J., Terhune, D. B., Polito, V., & Woody, E. (in press). A componential approach to hypnotizability. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice.
- Benham, G., Woody, E. Z., Wilson, K. S., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Expect the unexpected: Ability, attitude, and responsiveness to hypnosis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 342–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.91.2.342
- Bowers, K. S. (1981). Do the Stanford Scales tap the “classic suggestion effect”? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148108409142
- Bowers, K. S. (1993). The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Normative and comparative data. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149308414536
- Bowers, P., Laurence, J.-R., & Hart, D. (1988). The experience of hypnotic suggestions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148808410523
- Braffman, W., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 578–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.578
- Brown, R. J., Antonova, E., Langley, A., & Oakley, D. A. (2001). The effects of absorption and reduced critical though on suggestibility in an hypnotic context. Contemporary Hypnosis, 18(2), 62–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.220
- Brown, R. J., & Oakley, D. A. (2004). An integrative cognitive theory of hypnosis and high hypnotizability. In M. Heap, R. J. Brown, & D. A. Oakley (Eds.), The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues (pp. 152–186). Brunner-Routledge.
- Bryant, R. A., Guthrie, R. M., & Moulds, M. L. (2001). Hypnotizability in acute stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(4), 600–604. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.4.600
- Cardeña, E. (2005). The phenomenology of deep hypnosis: Quiescent and physically active. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140490914234
- Cardeña, E., & Terhune, D. B. (2014). Hypnotizability, personality traits and the propensity to experience alterations of consciousness. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(3), 292–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000026
- Carlson, E. B., & Putnam, F. W. (1989). Integrating research on dissociation and hypnotizability: Are there two pathways to hypnotizability? Dissociation, 2(1), 32–38.
- Coltheart, M., Cox, R., Sowman, P., Morgan, H., Barnier, A., Langdon, R., Connaughton, E., Teichmann, L., Williams, N., & Polito, V. (2018). Belief, delusion, hypnosis, and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cortex, 101(4), 234–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.001
- Connors, M. H. (2015). Hypnosis and belief: A review of hypnotic delusions. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 27–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.015
- Council, J. R. (2002). A historical overview of hypnotizability assessment. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44(3–4), 199–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2002.10403480
- Cunningham, P. F., & Ramos, P. (2012). Involuntary experiencing and the performance of hypnotic test suggestions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60(4), 416–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2012.701090
- Dienes, Z., & Hutton, S. (2013). Understanding hypnosis metacognitively: RTMS applied to left DLPFC increases hypnotic suggestibility. Cortex, 49(2), 386–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.07.009
- Elkins, G. (2014). Hypnotic relaxation therapy: Principles and applications. Springer Publishing.
- Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2015.1011465
- Field, P. B. (1965). An inventory scale of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13(4), 238–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146508412946
- Freedman, S. (2012). The measurement of posthypnotic amnesia with the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Form A [Masters dissertation]. Concordia University.
- Galea, V., Woody, E. Z., Szechtman, H., & Pierrynowski, M. R. (2010). Motion in response to the hypnotic suggestion of arm rigidity: A window on underlying mechanisms. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 58(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207141003760561
- Gorassini, D. R. (2004). Enhancing hypnotizability. In M. Heap (Ed.), The highly hypnotizable person Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues (pp. 213–239). Routledge.
- Haggard, P. (2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 18(4), 196–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.14
- Haggard, P., Cartledge, P., Dafydd, M., & Oakley, D. A. (2004). Anomalous control: When ‘free-will’ is not conscious. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(3), 646–654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.06.001
- Hawkins, R., & Wenzel, L. (1999). The Group Scale of Hypnotic Ability and response booklet. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27(1), 20–31.
- Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. Harcourt, Brace & World.
- Hilgard, E. R., Crawford, H. J., Bowers, P., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1979). A tailored SHSS:C permitting user modification for special purposes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147908407552
- Hilgard, E. R., Crawford, H. J., & Wert, A. (1979). The Stanford Hypnotic Arm Levitation Induction and Test (SHALIT): A six-minute hypnotic induction and measurement scale. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147908407551
- Hilgard, E. R., Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Gough, P. (1958). Individual differences in susceptibility to hypnosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 44(12), 1255–1259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.44.12.1255
- Hull, C. L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility: An experimental approach. D. Appleton-Century.
- Jensen, M. P., Jamieson, G. A., Lutz, A., Mazzoni, G., McGeown, W. J., Santarcangelo, E. L., Demertzi, A., De Pascalis, V., Bányai, É. I., Rominger, C., Vuilleumier, P., Faymonville, M.-E., & Terhune, D. B. (2017). New directions in hypnosis research: Strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix004
- Kihlstrom, J. F. (2008). The domain of hypnosis, revisited. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 21–52). Oxford University Press.
- King, B. J., & Council, J. R. (1998). Intentionality during hypnosis: An ironic process analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149808410009
- Kingdom, F. A. A., & Prins, N. (2010). Psychophysics: A practical introduction. Elsevier.
- Kirsch, I. (1997). Suggestibility or hypnosis: What do our scales really measure? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149708416124
- Kirsch, I. (1999). Hypnosis and placebos: Response expectancy as a mediator of suggestion effects. Anales De Psicologia, 15(1), 99–110.
- Kirsch, I., & Braffman, W. (2001). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 57–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00115
- Kirsch, I., Council, J. R., & Wickless, C. (1990). Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 38(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149008414506
- Kirsch, I., Milling, L. S., & Burgess, C. (1998). Experiential scoring for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C scale. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149808410007
- Lauer, L. W. (1966). Factorial components of Hypnotic susceptibility [Doctoral dissertation] Stanford University.
- Laurence, J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., & Du Chéné, T. (2008). Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 225–253). Oxford University Press.
- London, P. (1963). Children’s Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- London, P. (1988). The Children’s Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Ludwig, V. U., Stelzel, C., Krutiak, H., Magrabi, A., Steimke, R., Paschke, L. M., & Walter, H. (2013). The suggestible brain: Posthypnotic effects on value-based decision-making. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(9), 1281–1288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst110
- Lush, P., Moga, G., McLatchie, N., & Dienes, Z. (2018). The Sussex-Waterloo Scale of hypnotisability (SWASH): Measuring capacity for altering conscious experience. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2018(1), niy006. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niy006
- Lynn, S. J., Laurence, J.-R., & Kirsch, I. (2015). Hypnosis, suggestion, and suggestibility: An integrative model. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(3), 314–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2014.976783
- McConkey, K. M., & Barnier, A. J. (2004). High Hypnotizability: Unity and diversity in behavior and experience. In M. Heap, R. J. Brown, & D. A. Oakley (Eds.), The highly hypnotizable person Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues: (pp. 61–84). Routledge.
- McConkey, K. M., Wende, V., & Barnier, A. J. (1999). Measuring change in the subjective experience of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149908410020
- Montgomery, G. H., Schnur, J. B., & David, D. (2011). The impact of hypnotic suggestibility in clinical care settings. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59(3), 294–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.570656
- Moore, J. W. (2016). What is the sense of agency and why does it matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272
- Moran, T. E., Kurtz, R. M., & Strube, M. J. (2002). The efficacy of the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Form C. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44(3–4), 221–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2002.10403482
- Morgan, A. H. (1973). The heritability of hypnotic susceptibility in twins. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034854
- Morgan, A. H., & Hilgard, J. R. (1978/1979). The Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for adults. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21(2–3), 134–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1978.10403968
- Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2009). Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(6), 264–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.004
- Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2013). Hypnotic suggestion: Opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8), 565–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3538
- Palfi, B., Moga, G., Lush, P., Scott, R. B., & Dienes, Z. (2019). Can hypnotic suggestibility be measured online? Psychological Research, 84(5), 1460–1471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01162-w
- Parris, B. A. (2017). The role of frontal executive functions in hypnosis and hypnotic suggestibility. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000106
- Pekala, R. J. (1991). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute.
- Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2007). An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: With particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 167–194). Oxford University Press.
- Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: I. Implications for understanding hypnotism. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52(4), 275–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2010.10401732
- Piccione, C., Hilgard, E. R., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1989). On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 289–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.56.2.289
- Polczyk, R., & Pasek, T. (2006). Types of suggestibility: Relationships among compliance, indirect, and direct suggestibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54(4), 392–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140600856764
- Polito, V., Barnier, A. J., & Woody, E. Z. (2013). Developing the Sense of Agency Rating Scale (SOARS): An empirical measure of agency disruption in hypnosis. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 684–696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.003
- Polito, V., Barnier, A. J., Woody, E. Z., & Connors, M. H. (2014). Measuring agency change across the domain of hypnosis. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000010
- Raz, A., Kirsch, I., Pollard, J., & Nitkin-Kaner, Y. (2006). Suggestion reduces the stroop effect. Psychological Science, 17(2), 91–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01669.x
- Rominger, C., Weiss, E. M., Nagl, S., Niederstatter, H., Parson, W., & Papousek, I. (2014). Carriers of the COMT Met/Met allele have higher degrees of hypnotizability, provided that they have good attentional control: A case of gene-trait interaction. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 62(4), 455–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2014.931177
- Sadler, P., & Woody, E. (2021). Multicomponent theories of hypnotizability: History and prospects. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 69(1) 27–49.
- Sadler, P., & Woody, E. Z. (2004). Four decades of group hypnosis scales: What does item-response theory tell us about what we’ve been measuring? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52(2), 132–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.52.2.132.28092
- Scacchia, P., & De Pascalis, V. (2020). Effects of prehypnotic instructions on hypnotizability and relationships between hypnotizability, absorption, and empathy. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 62(3), 231–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2019.1586639
- Sheehan, P. W., & McConkey, K. M. (1982). Hypnosis and experience: The exploration of phenomena and process. Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Spanos, N. P., & Gorassini, D. R. (1984). Structure of hypnotic test suggestions and attributions of responding involuntarily. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 688–696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.688
- Spanos, N. P., Radtke, H. L., Hodgins, D. C., Stam, H. J., & Bertrand, L. D. (1983). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 523–535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.523
- Spiegel, H., & Spiegel, D. (1978). Trance and treatment: Clinical uses of hypnosis. Basic Books.
- Szechtman, H., Woody, E., Bowers, K. S., & Nahmias, C. (1998). Where the imaginal appears real: A positron emission tomography study of auditory hallucinations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(4), 1956–1960. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.4.1956
- Tart, C. T., & Hilgard, E. R. (1966). Responsiveness to suggestions under “hypnosis” and “waking-imagination” conditions: A methodological observation. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 14(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146608412967
- Tataryn, D. J., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (2017). Hypnotic tactile anesthesia: Psychophysical and signal-detection analyses. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 65(2), 133–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2017.1276358
- Terhune, D. B. (2014). Defining hypnosis: The pitfalls of prioritizing spontaneous experience over response to suggestion. Journal of Mind-Body Regulation, 2(2), 115–117.
- Terhune, D. B. (2015). Discrete response patterns in the upper range of hypnotic suggestibility: A latent profile analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 334–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.018
- Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2010a). Differential patterns of spontaneous experiential response to a hypnotic induction: A latent profile analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 1140–1150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.006
- Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2010b). Methodological and interpretative issues regarding the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory – Hypnotic Assessment Procedure: A comment on Pekala et al. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 53(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2010.10404333
- Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2015). Dissociative subtypes in posttraumatic stress disorders and hypnosis: Neurocognitive parallels and clinical implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 452–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415604611
- Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2016). Nuances and uncertainties regarding hypnotic inductions: Toward a theoretically informed praxis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 59(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2016.1201454
- Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2011). Dissociative tendencies and individual differences in high hypnotic suggestibility. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 16(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2010.503048
- Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Pt A), 59–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002
- Terhune, D. B., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2012). The emerging neuroscience of hypnosis. Cortex, 48(3), 382–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.007
- Terhune, D. B., & Oakley, D. A. (2020). Hypnosis and imagination. In A. Abraham (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of imagination (pp. 711–727). Cambridge University Press.
- Varga, K., Farkas, L., & Mero, L. (2012). On the objectivity of the scoring of Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60(4), 458–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2012.675298
- Wagstaff, G. F. (2014). On the centrallity of the concept of an altered state to definitions of hypnosis. Journal of Mind-Body Regulation, 2(2), 90–108.
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1974). When is an “instruction” an “instruction”? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22(3), 258–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147408413005
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1980). Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22(3), 130–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1980.10403217
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scales, Forms A and B. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1963). Stanford Profile Scales of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Forms I and II. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1967). Revised Stanford Profile Scales of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Forms I and II. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Whalley, M. G., & Brooks, G. B. (2009). Enhancement of suggestibility and imaginative ability with nitrous oxide. Psychopharmacology, 203(4), 745–752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1424-0
- Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16(10), 780–784. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x
- Wieder, L., & Terhune, D. B. (2019). Trauma and anxious attachment influence the relationship between suggestibility and dissociation: A moderated-moderation analysis. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 24(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2019.1606705
- Winkel, J. D., Younger, J. W., Tomcik, N., Borckardt, J. J., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Anatomy of a hypnotic response: Self-report estimates, actual behavior, and physiological response to the hypnotic suggestion of arm rigidity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140500528430
- Woody, E. Z. (1997). Have the hypnotic susceptibility scales outlived their usefulness? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45(3), 226–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149708416125
- Woody, E. Z., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we know and how should we use them? In M. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 255–281). Oxford University Press.
- Woody, E. Z., Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2005). Multiple hypnotizabilities: Differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.200
- Woody, E. Z., & McConkey, K. M. (2003). What we don’t know about the brain and hypnosis, but need to: A view from the Buckhorn Inn. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51(3), 309–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.51.3.309.15523
- Woody, E. Z., & Szechtman, H. (2007). To see feelingly: Emotion, motivation, and hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 241–256). Oxford University Press.
- Younger, J., Kemmerer, D. D., Winkel, J. D., & Nash, M. R. (2005). The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of self-report and the memory for items. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53(3), 306–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140590961411