References
- Baker, R. A. (1990). They call it hypnosis. Prometheus Books.
- Balthazard, C. G., & Woody, E. Z. (1985). The “stuff” of hypnotic performance: A review of psychometric approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 283–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.283
- Balthazard, C. G., & Woody, E. Z. (1989). Bimodality, dimensionality, and the notion of hypnotic types. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148908410534
- Barber, T. X. (1963). The effects of hypnosis on pain. Psychosomatic Medicine, 25(4), 303–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-196307000-00001
- Barber, T. X. (1969). Hypnosis: A scientific approach. Van Nostrand, Reinhold.
- Barber, T. X. (1972). Suggested (“hypnotic”) behavior: The trance paradigm versus an alternative paradigm. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Research developments and perspectives (pp. 115–182). Aldine-Atherton.
- Barber, T. X. (1999). A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. In I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardeña-Buelna, & S. Amigó (Eds.), Dissociation, trauma, memory, and hypnosis book series. Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives (pp. 21–48). American Psychological Association.
- Barnier, A. J., Terhune, D. B., Polito, V., & Woody, E. (in press). A componential approach to hypnotizability. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice.
- Barrett, D. (1990). Deep trance subjects: A schema of two distinct subgroups. In R. G. Kunzendorf (Ed.), Mental imagery (pp. 101–112). Plenum Press.
- Barrett, D. (1996). Fantasizers and dissociaters: Two types of high hypnotizables, two different imagery styles. In R. G. Kunzendorf, N. P. Spanos, & B. Wallace (Eds.), Hypnosis and imagination (pp. 123–135). Baywood.
- Bentall, R. P. (1990). The illusion of reality: A review and integration of psychological research on hallucinations. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.82
- Bowers, K. S. (1981). Do the stanford scales tap the “classic suggestion effect”? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148108409142
- Bowers, K. S. (1983). Hypnosis for the seriously curious. W.W. Norton. (original work published in 1976)
- Bowers, K. S. (1998). Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C: Manual and response booklet. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149808410006
- Bowers, P. G., Laurence, J.-R., & Hart, D. (1988). The experience of hypnotic suggestions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148808410523
- Dixon, M., & Laurence, J.-R. (1992). Two hundred years of hypnosis research: Questions resolved? Questions unanswered! In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 34–66). Guilford.
- Galea, V., Woody, E. Z., Szechtman, H., & Pierrynowski, M. R. (2010). Motion in response to the hypnotic suggestion of arm rigidity: A window on underlying mechanisms. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 58(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207141003760561
- Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
- Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radix. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). Free Press.
- Hargadon, R., Bowers, K. S., & Woody, E. Z. (1995). Does counterpain imagery mediate hypnotic analgesia? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(3), 508–516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.104.3.508
- Hargadon, R. M. (1993). An examination of factors associated with hypnotic analgesia [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Waterloo.
- Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Hilgard, E. R., Crawford, H. J., Bowers, P. G., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1979). A tailored SHSS:C, permitting user modification for special purposes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147908407552
- Kallio, S., & Revonsuo, A. (2003). Hypnotic phenomena and altered states of consciousness: A multilevel framework of description and explanation. Contemporary Hypnosis, 20(3), 111–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.273
- Kirsch, I., Milling, L. S., & Burgess, C. A. (1998). Experiential scoring for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C Scale. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149808410007
- Laurence, J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., & Du Chéné, T. (2008). Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–253). Oxford University Press.
- Lubke, G. H., & Miller, P. J. (2015). Does nature have joints worth carving? A discussion of taxometrics, model-based clustering and latent variable mixture modeling. Psychological Medicine, 45(4), 705–715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171400169X
- Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
- Lubke, G. H., & Neale, M. C. (2006). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(4), 499–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_4
- Mallard, D., & Bryant, R. A. (2001). Hypnotic color blindness and performance on the Stroop test. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 49(4), 330–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140108410082
- McConkey, K. M., Glisky, M. L., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1989). Individual differences among hypnotic virtuosos: A case comparison. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 17(2), 131–140.
- McConkey, K. M., Wende, V., & Barnier, A. J. (1999). Measuring change in the subjective experience of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149908410020
- Nash, M. R., & Barnier, A. J. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice. Oxford University Press.
- Nash, M. R., & Spinler, D. (1989). Hypnosis and transference: A measure of archaic involvement. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148908410542
- Oakman, J. M., & Woody, E. Z. (1996). A taxometric analysis of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 980–991. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.980
- Pekala, R. J. (1991a). Hypnotic types: Evidence from a cluster analysis of phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis, 8(2), 95–104.
- Pekala, R. J. (1991b). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI). Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute.
- Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Marcano, G. (1995). Hypnotic types: A partial replication concerning phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis, 12(3), 194–200.
- Piccione, C., Hilgard, E. R., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1989). On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 289–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.289
- Polito, V., Barnier, A. J., & Woody, E. Z. (2013). Developing the Sense of Agency Rating Scale (SOARS): An empirical measure of agency disruption in hypnosis. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 684–696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.003
- Polito, V., Barnier, A. J., Woody, E. Z., & Connors, M. H. (2014). Measuring agency change across the domain of hypnosis. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000010
- Sheehan, P. W., & McConkey, K. M. (1982). Hypnosis and experience: The exploration of phenomena and process. Erlbaum.
- Shor, R. E. (1959). Hypnosis and the concept of the generalized reality-orientation. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 13(3), 582–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1959.13.3.582
- Shor, R. E. (1962). Three dimensions of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 10(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146208415862
- Shor, R. E. (1979). A phenomenological method for the measurement of variables important to an understanding of the nature of hypnosis. In E. Fromm & R. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 105–135). Aldine.
- Shye, S., Elizur, D., & Hoffman, M. (1994). Introduction to facet theory: Content design and intrinsic data analysis in behavioral research. Sage.
- Spanos, N. P. (1971). Goal-directed fantasy and the performance of hypnotic test suggestions. Psychiatry, 34(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1971.11023658
- Spanos, N. P. (1986). Hypnotic behavior: A social-psychological interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and “trance logic.”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(3), 449–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00046537
- Sutcliffe, J. P. (1960). “Credulous” and “skeptical” views of hypnotic phenomena: A review of certain evidence and methodology. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 8(2), 73–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146008415837
- Sutcliffe, J. P. (1961). “Credulous” and “skeptical” views of hypnotic phenomena: Experiments on esthesia, hallucination, and delusion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046745
- Szechtman, H., Woody, E., Bowers, K. S., & Nahmias, C. (1998). Where the imaginal appears real: A PET study of auditory hallucinations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(4), 1956–1960. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.4.1956
- Tart, C. T. (1970). Self-report scales of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 18(2), 105–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147008415909
- Tart, C. T. (1972). Measuring the depth of an altered state of consciousness with particular åreference to self-report scales of hypnotic depth. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Research developments and perspectives (pp. 445–477). Aldine-Atherton.
- Tellegen, A. (1978). On measures and conceptions of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21(2–3), 219–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1978.10403973
- Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2015). Dissociative subtypes in posttraumatic stress disorders and hypnosis: Neurocognitive parallels and clinical implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 452–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415604611
- Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2011a). Dissociative tendencies and individual differences in high hypnotic suggestibility. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 16(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2010.503048
- Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2011b). Dissociated control as a signature of typological variability in high hypnotic suggestibility. Consciousness & Cognition, 20(3), 727–736. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.11.005
- Terhune, D. B., Polito, V., Barnier, A. J., & Woody, E. Z. (2016). Variations in the sense of agency during hypnotic responding: Insights from latent profile analysis. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000107
- Varga, K., Józsa, E., Bányai, É. I., & Gősi-Greguss, A. C. (2006). A new way of characterizing hypnotic interactions: Dyadic Interactional Harmony (DIH) questionnaire. Contemporary Hypnosis, 23(4), 151–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.320
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1974). When is an “instruction” an “instruction”? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22(3), 258–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147408413005
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1997). Hypnotic susceptibility: A personal and historical note regarding the development and naming of the Stanford Scales. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149708416114
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). The Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Stanford University Press.
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1963). Stanford Profile Scales of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Forms I and II. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1967). Revised Stanford Profile Scales of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Forms I and II. Consulting Psychologists Press.
- White, R. W. (1937). Two types of hypnotic trance and their personality correlates. Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 279–289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1937.9917498
- Wilson, S. C., & Barber, T. X. (1983). The fantasy-prone personality: Implications for understanding imagery, hypnosis, and parapsychological phenomena. In A. A. Sheikh (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and application (pp. 340–387). Wiley.
- Winkel, J. D., Younger, J. W., Tomcik, N., Borckardt, J. J., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Anatomy of a hypnotic response: Self-report estimates, actual behavior, and physiological response to the hypnotic suggestion of arm rigidity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140500528430
- Woody, E., & Sadler, P. (1999). A mostly positive set on a new view of hypnosis. Contemporary Hypnosis, 16(3), 187–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.175
- Woody, E., & Sadler, P. (2016). What can a hypnotic induction do? American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 59(2), 138–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2016.1185004
- Woody, E., & Sadler, P. (2020). Interpersonal aspects of hypnosis: Twisted pears and other forbidden fruit. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000229.
- Woody, E. Z., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we need and how should we use them? In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 255–281). Oxford University Press.
- Woody, E. Z., Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2005). Multiple hypnotizabilities: Differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.200
- Woody, E. Z., & McConkey, K. M. (2003). What we don’t know about the brain and hypnosis, but need to: A view from the Buckhorn Inn. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51(3), 309–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.51.3.309.15523