Subjectively complete hypnotic deafness and auditory priming

References

• Barber , T. X. and Calverley , D. S. 1964 . Experimental studies in hypnotic behavior. Suggested deafness evaluated by delayed auditory feedback . Brit. J. Psychol. , 55 : 439 – 446 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black , S. and Wigan , E. R. 1961 . An investigation of selective deafness produced by direct suggestion under hypnosis . Brit. med. J. , 2 : 736 – 741 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum , G. S. and Barbour , J. S. 1979 . Selective inattention to anxiety-linked stimuli . J. exp. Psychol.: Gen. , 108 : 182 – 224 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent , D. E. 1977 . The hidden preattentive processes . Amer. Psychologist , 67 : 109 – 118 .
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent , D. E. and Gregory , M. 1967 . Perception of emotionally toned words . Nature , 215 : 581 – 584 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford , H. J. , Macdonald , H. and Hilgard , E. R. 1979 . Hypnotic deafness: A psychophysical study of response to tone intensity as modified by hypnosis . Amer. J. Psychol. , 92 : 193 – 214 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon , N. F. 1958 . The effect of subliminal stimulation upon autonomic and verbal behaviour . J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. , 57 : 19 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Dixon , N. F. 1971 . Subliminal perception: The nature of a controversy , London : McCraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Dixon , N. F. 1981 . Preconscious processing , Chichester : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Evans , F. J. and Orne , M. T. 1971 . The disappearing hypnotist: The use of simulating subjects to evaluate how subjects perceive experimental procedures . Int. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis , 19 : 277 – 296 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler , C. A. , Wolford , G. , Slade , R. and Tassinary , L. 1981 . Lexical access with and without awareness . J. exp. Psychol.: Gen. , 110 : 341 – 362 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard , E. R. 1979 . “ Divided consciousness in hypnosis: The implications of the hidden observer ” . In Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives, , 2nd rev. ed. , Edited by: Fromm , E. and Shor , R. E. 45 – 79 . New York : Aldine .
   Google Scholar
• Korotkin , I. , Pleshkova , T. V. and Suslova , M. M. 1969 . Changes in auditory thresholds as a result of hypnotic suggestion . Soviet Neurol. Psychiat. , 1 : 33 – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• Kramer , E. and Tucker , G. R. 1967 . Hypnotically suggested deafness and delayed auditory feedback . Int. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis , 15 : 37 – 43 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt , E. E. and Chapman , R. H. 1979 . “ Hypnosis as a research method ” . In Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives, , 2nd rev. ed. , Edited by: Fromm , E. and Shor , R. E. 185 – 215 . New York : Aldine .
   Google Scholar
• Lewis , J. L. 1970 . Semantic processing of unattended messages using dichotic listening . J. exp. Psychol. , 85 : 225 – 228 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacKay , D. G. 1973 . Aspects of the theory of comprehension, memory, and attention . Quart. J. exp. Psychol. , 25 : 22 – 40 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcel , A. 1983 . Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes . Cog. Psychol. , 15 : 238 – 300 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murch , G. M. 1965 . A simple laboratory demonstration of subception . Brit. J. Psychol. , 56 : 467 – 470 .
   Google Scholar
• Murch , G. M. 1967 . Temporal gradients of response to subliminal stimuli . Psychol. Rec. , 17 : 483 – 492 .
   Google Scholar
• Neely , J. H. 1977 . Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention . J. exp. Psychol.: Gen. , 106 : 226 – 254 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne , M. T. 1971 . The simulation of hypnosis: Why, how, and what it means . Int. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis , 19 : 183 – 210 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne , M. T. and Evans , F. J. 1966 . Inadvertent termination of hypnotized and simulating subjects . Int. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis , 14 : 61 – 78 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne , M. T. , Sheehan , P. W. and Evans , F. J. 1968 . Occurrence of posthypnotic behavior outside the experimental setting . J. Pers. soc. Psychol. , 9 : 189 – 196 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibe , K. E. , Gray , A. L. and Keim , C. S. 1968 . Hypnotically induced deafness and delayed auditory feedback: A comparison of real and simulating subjects . Int. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis , 16 : 158 – 164 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevrin , H. 1973 . Brain wave correlates of subliminal stimulation, unconscious attention, primary and secondary process thinking, and repressiveness . Psycholog. Iss. , 8 : 56 – 87 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shor , R. E. and Orne , E. C. 1962 . Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A , Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologists Press .
   Google Scholar
• Spanos , N. P. 1982 . Hypnotic behavior: A cognitive, social psychological perspective . Res. Com. Psychol., Psychiat., Behav. , 7 : 199 – 213 .
   Google Scholar
• Spanos , N. P. , Jones , B. and Malfara , A. 1982 . Hypnotic deafness: Now you hear it–now you still hear it . J. abnorm. Psychol. , 91 : 75 – 77 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spence , D. P. and Bressler , J. 1962 . Subliminal activation of conceptual associates: A study of “rational” pre-conscious thinking . J. Pers. , 38 : 89 – 105 .
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe , J. P. 1961 . “Credulous” and “skeptical” views of hypnotic phenomena: Experiments on esthesia, hallucination, and delusion . J. abnorm. Psychol. , 76 : 279 – 287 .
   Google Scholar
• Wagstaff , G. F. 1981 . Hypnosis, compliance, and belief , New York : St. Martin's .
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer , A. M. and Hilgard , E. R. 1967 . Revised Stanford Profile Scales of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form II , Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologists Press .
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc , R. B. 1980 . Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences . Amer. Psychologist , 35 : 151 – 175 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar