What this Field Needs is a Good Nomological Network

References

• Bowers , K. S. 1993 . The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Nonnative and comparative data . International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis , 41 : 35 – 46 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa , P. T. and McCrae , R. R. 1992 . Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-N and NEO Five-Factor Inventoy (NEO-FFI) Professional manual , Odessa, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources .
   Google Scholar
• Council , J. R. , Kirsch , I. and Grant , D. L. 1996 . “ Imagining. expectancy, and hypnotic responding ” . In Hypnosis and imagination , Edited by: Kunzendorf , R. G. , Spanos , N. P. and Wallace , B. J. 41 – 65 . Amityville, Ny : Baywood .
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach , L. J. and Meehl , P. E. 1955 . Construct validity in psychological tests . Psychological Bulletin , 52 : 281 – 302 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges , L. V. and Olkin , L. 1985 . Statistical methods for meta-analysis , San Diego, CA : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard , E. R. 1965 . Hypnotic susceptibility , New York : Harcourt, Brace, & World .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , M. B. and Fennel , R S. 1965 . Runway performance in two strains of rats . Florida Academy of Sciences , 28 : 289 – 296 .
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch , L and Lynn , S. J. 1995 . The altered state of hypnosis: Changes in the theoretical landscape . American Psychologist , 50 : 846 – 858 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykken , D. T. 1991 . “ What's wrong with psycholoey anyway? ” . In Matters of public interest: Essays in honour of Paul E. Meehl: Vol. 1. Matters of public interest , Edited by: Cicchetti , D. and Grove , W. M. 3 – 39 . Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press .
   Google Scholar
• Nadon , R. , Laurence , J. R. and Perry , C. 1987 . Multiple predictors of hypnotic susceptibility . Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology , 53 : 948 – 960 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry , C. , Nadon , R and Button , J. 1992 . “ The measurement of hypnotic ability ” . In Contemporary hypnosis research , Edited by: Fromm , E. and Nash , M. R. 459 – 490 . New York : Guilford .
   Google Scholar
• Piccione , C. , Hilgad , E. R. and Zimbardo , P. G. 1989 . On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 56 : 289 – 295 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla , R. A. 1987 . A Pavlovian analysis of goal-directed behavior . American Psychologist , 42 : 119 – 129 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor , R E. and Orne , E. C. 1962 . Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A , Palo Alto, CA : consulting Psychologists Press .
   Google Scholar
• Spanos , N. P. , Radtke , H. L. , Hodgins , D. C. , Stam , H. J. and Bertrand , L. D. 1983 . The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties . Psychological Reports , 53 : 523 – 535 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel , H. , Aroson , M. , Fleiss , J. L. and Haber , J. 1976 . Psychometric analysis of the Hypnotic Induction Profile . International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis , 24 : 300 – 315 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques: Preliminary proposal . 1954 . Psychological Bulletin Supplement , 51 : 1 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellegen , A. 1981 . Practicing the two disciplines for relaxation and enlightenment Comment on “Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback The relevance of attention” by Qualls and Sheehan . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 110 : 217 – 226 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellegen , A. 1991 . “ Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence, and assessment ” . In Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl, Vol. 2: Personality and psychopathology , Edited by: Cicchetti , D. and Grove , W. G. 10 – 35 . Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press .
   Google Scholar
• Underwood , B. J. 1975 . Individual differences as a crudble in theory construction . American Psychologist , 30 : 128 – 134 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer , A M. and Hilgard , E. R. 1959 . Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B , Palo Alto, CA : consulting Psychologists Press .
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer , A. M. and Hilgard , E. R. 1962 . Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C , Palo Alto, CA : consulting Psychologists Press .
   Google Scholar
• Woody , E. Z. , Bowers , K. S. and Oakman , J. M. 1992 . “ A conceptual analysis of hypnotic responsiveness: Experience, individual differences, and context ” . In Contemporary hypnosis research , Edited by: Fromm , E. and Nash , M. R. 3 – 33 . New York : Guilford .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , J. C. and Mischel , W. 1987 . A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53 : 1159 – 1177 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar