Efficient parallel Monte-Carlo techniques for pricing American options including counterparty credit risk

References

• L.A. Abbas-Turki, S. Crépey, and B. Diallo, XVA principles, nested Monte Carlo strategies, and GPU optimizations, Int. J. Theoretical Appl. Finance 21 (2018), p. 1850030. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024918500309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Albanese, S. Caenazzo, and S. Crépey, Credit, funding, margin, and capital valuation adjustments for bilateral portfolios, Probability, Uncertainty Quantitative Risk 2 (2017), p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• N. Areal, A. Rodrigues, and M. Armada, On improving the least squares monte carlo option valuation method, Rev. Derivatives Res. 11 (2008), pp. 119–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Arregui, B. Salvador, and C. Vázquez, PDE models and numerical methods for total value adjustment in European and American options with counterparty risk, Appl. Math. Comput. 308 (2017), pp. 31–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Arregui, B. Salvador, and C. Vázquez, A Monte Carlo approach to American options pricing including counterparty risk, Int. J. Comput. Math. 96 (2019), pp. 2157–2176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Arregui, B. Salvador, D. Ševčovič, and C. Vázquez, Total value adjustment for European options with two stochastic factors. Mathematical model, analysis and numerical simulation, Computers Math. Appl. 76 (2018), pp. 725–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Arregui, B. Salvador, D. Ševčovič, and C. Vázquez, PDE models for American options with counterparty risk and two stochastic factors: Mathematical analysis and numerical solution, Computers Math. Appl. 79 (2020), pp. 1525–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Benguigui and F. Baude, Fast American basket option pricing on a multi-GPU cluster, in Proceedings of the 22nd High Performance Computing Symposium, Tampa, FL, 2014, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• A. Borovykh, C.W. Oosterlee, and A. Pascucci, Efficient XVA computation under local Lévy models, SIAM J. Financial Math. 9 (2018), pp. 251–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Boyle, M. Broadie, and P. Glasserman, Monte Carlo methods for security pricing, J. Economic Dyn. Control 21 (1997), pp. 1267–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Brigo and A. Capponi, Bilateral counterparty risk valuation with stochastic dynamical models and applications to CDSs, preprint (2009). Available at arXiv, math. 0812.3705.
   Google Scholar
• D. Brigo, M. Morini, and A. Pallavicini, Counterparty Credit Risk, Collateral and Funding, Wiley, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• C. Burgard and M. Kjaer, In the balance, Risk (2011), pp. 72–75. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1785262.
   Google Scholar
• C. Burgard and M. Kjaer, PDE representations of derivatives with bilateral counterparty risk and funding costs, J. Credit Risk 7 (2011), pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Burgard and M. Kjaer, Funding strategies, funding costs, Risk (2013), pp. 82–87.
   Google Scholar
• L. Capriotti, Y. Jiang, and A. Macrina, AAD and least-square Monte Carlo: Fast Bermudan-style options and XVA Greeks, Algorithmic Finance 6 (2017), pp. 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Capriotti, S. Lee, and J.M. Peacock, Real time counterparty credit risk management in Monte Carlo, Risk (2011), pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• J.F. Carriere, Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression, Insurance: Math. Econ. 19 (1996), pp. 19–30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668796000042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.W. Chau, J. Tang, and C.W. Oosterlee, An SGBM-XVA demonstrator: A scalable Python tool for pricing XVA, J. Math. Industry 10(7) (2020), pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Chen and C.C. Christara, Penalty methods for bilateral XVA pricing in European and American contingent claims by a partial differential equation model, J. Comput. Finance 24 (2021), pp. 41–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Cong and C.W. Oosterlee, Pricing Bermudan options under Merton jump-diffusion asset dynamics, Int. J. Comput. Math. 92 (2015), pp. 2406–2432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Cook, CUDA Programming: A Developer's Guide to Parallel Computing with GPUs, 1st ed., Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• S. Crépey, Bilateral counterparty risk under funding constraints–part I: Pricing, Math. Finance 25 (2015), pp. 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Crépey, Bilateral counterparty risk under funding constraints–part II: CVA, Math. Finance 25 (2015), pp. 23–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CUB webpage. Available at https://nvlabs.github.io/cub/.
   Google Scholar
• CUDA programming guide. Available at https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/.
   Google Scholar
• CUDA webpage. Available at https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-zone.
   Google Scholar
• cuRAND webpage. Available at https://developer.nvidia.com/curand.
   Google Scholar
• F. Fang and C.W. Oosterlee, Pricing early-exercise and discrete barrier options by Fourier-cosine series expansions, Numerische Mathematik 114 (2009), pp. 27–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Fatica and E. Phillips, Pricing American options with least squares Monte Carlo on GPUs, in Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on High Performance Computational Finance, WHPCF '13, ACM, New York, NY, 2013, pp. 1–6. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2535557.2535564.
   Google Scholar
• Q. Feng and C.W. Oosterlee, Computing credit valuation adjustment for Bermudan options with wrong way risk, Int. J. Theoretical Appl. Finance 20 (2017), p. 1750056.
   Google Scholar
• J. Fernández, A. Ferreiro, J. García-Rodríguez, A. Leitao, J. López-Salas, and C. Vázquez, Static and dynamic SABR stochastic volatility models: Calibration and option pricing using GPUs, Math. Comput. Simul. 94 (2013), pp. 55–75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475413001389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Ferreiro-Ferreiro, J.A. García-Rodríguez, L. Souto, and C. Vázquez, A new calibration of the Heston stochastic local volatility model and its parallel implementation on GPUs, Math. Comput. Simul. 177 (2020), pp. 467–486. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475420301129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Glasserman, Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering, Springer, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• P. Glasserman and B. Yu, Simulation for American options: Regression now or regression later? in Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2002, Springer, 2004, pp. 213–226.
   Google Scholar
• M.B. Haugh and L. Kogan, Pricing American options: A duality approach, Oper. Res. 52 (2004), pp. 258–270. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jain, Á. Leitao, and C.W. Oosterlee, Rolling adjoints: Fast greeks along Monte Carlo scenarios for early-exercise options, J. Comput. Sci. 33 (2019), pp. 95–112. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750318312547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jain and C.W. Oosterlee, Pricing high-dimensional Bermudan options using the stochastic grid method, Int. J. Comput. Math. 89 (2012), pp. 1186–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2012.690035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jain and C.W. Oosterlee, The stochastic grid bundling method: Efficient pricing of Bermudan options and their Greeks, Appl. Math. Comput. 269 (2015), pp. 412–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Jan, B. Montrucchio, C. Ragusa, F.G. Khan, and O. Khan, Fast parallel sorting algorithms on GPUs, Int. J. Distributed Parallel Syst. 3 (2012), pp. 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• D.B. Kirk and W.W. Hwu, Programming Massively Parallel Processors: A Hands-On Approach, 3rd ed., Elsevier, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• P.E. Kloeden and E. Platen, Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations, Springer, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• A. Leitao and C.W. Oosterlee, GPU acceleration of the stochastic grid bundling method for early-exercise options, Int. J. Comput. Math. 92 (2015), pp. 2433–2454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.A. Longstaff and E.S. Schwartz, Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach, Rev. Financial Stud. 14 (2001), pp. 113–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modern GPU webpage. Available at https://moderngpu.github.io/.
   Google Scholar
• A. Pallavicini, D. Perini, and D. Brigo, Funding valuation adjustment: A consistent framework including CVA, DVA, collateral, netting rules and re-hypotecation, SSRN Electronic Journal (2011), pp. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• A. Pascucci, PDE and Martingale Methods in Option Pricing, Springer, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• V. Piterbarg, Funding beyond discounting: Collateral agreements and derivatives pricing, Risk 23 (2010), pp. 97–102.
   Google Scholar
• L.C.G. Rogers, Monte Carlo valuation of American options, Math. Finance 12 (2002), pp. 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Satish, M. Harris, and M. Garland, Designing efficient sorting algorithms for manycore GPUs, in Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• L. Stentoft, Convergence of the least squares monte carlo approach to American option valuation, Manage. Sci. 50 (2004), pp. 1193–1203. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrust webpage. Available at https://developer.nvidia.com/thrust.
   Google Scholar