On the compression of locational and environmental data in multi-vehicle missions: a control systems approach

References

• Aicardi, M., Casalino, G., Bicchi, A., & Balestrino, A. (1995). Closed loop steering and path following for unicycle-like vehicles: A simple Lyapunov function based approach. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2, 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullo, F., Cortés, J., & Martínez, S. (2009). Distributed control of robotic networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.coordinationbook.info.
   Google Scholar
• Casbeer, D.W., Kingston, D.B., Beard, R.W., Mclain, T.W., Li, S.M., & Mehra, R. (2006). Cooperative forest fire surveillance using a team of small unmanned air vehicles. International Journal of Systems Sciences, 37, 351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Chandrakasan, A.P., & Stojanović, V. (2012). Design and analysis of a hardware-efficient compressed sensing architecture for data compression in wireless sensors. IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, 47, 744–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Lewis, F. (2011). Synchronizing networked Lagrangian systems via binary control protocols. Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress (pp. 1225–1230). Milan, Italy: International Federation of Automatic Control.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, N., & Spong, M.W. (2006). Passivity-based control of multi-agent systems. In Advances in robot control: From everyday physics to human like movements, edited by S. Kawamura & M. Svinin (pp. 107–134). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., & Fierro, R. (2007). Mobile robotic sensors for perimeter detection and tracking. ISA Transactions, 46, 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortés, J., Martínez, S., Karatas, T., & Bullo, F. (2004). Coverage control for mobile sensing networks. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automatation, 20, 243–255.
   Google Scholar
• Das, A.K., Fierro, R., Kumar, V., Ostrowski, J.P., Spletzer, J., & Taylor, C.J. (2002). A vision-based formation control framework. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18, 813–825.
   Google Scholar
• Dimarogonas, D.V., & Kyriakopuolus, K.J. (2007). On the rendezvous problem for multiple nonholonomic agents. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52, 916–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirafzoon, A., Menhaj, M.B., & Afshar, A. (2011). Decentralized coverage control for multi-agent systems with nonlinear dynamics. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 94, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Q., & Gunzburguer, M. (1999). Centroidal voronoi tessellations: Aplications and algorithms. SIAM Review, 41, 637–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierro, R., Song, P., Das, A., & Kumar, V. (2002). Cooperative control of robots formation. In R. Murphey & P.M. Pardalos (Eds.), Cooperative control and optimization (pp. 73–93). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschelli, M., Egerstedt, M., Giua, A., & Mahulea, C. (2009). Constrained invariant motions for networked multi-agent systems. Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC 2009) (pp. 5749–5754). St. Louis, MO, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M.M., Pimenta, L.C.A., & Pereira, G.A.S. (2011). Coverage of Curves in 3D with swarms of nonholonomic aerial robots. Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress (pp. 10367–10372). Milan, Italy: International Federation of Automatic Control - IFAC.
   Google Scholar
• Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A.S. (2003). Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48, 988–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, H.K. (2002). Nonlinear systems (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Morse, A., & Anderson, B. (2003). The multi-agent rendezvous problem. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 1508–1513). Maui, HI, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Luna, J.M., Fierro, R., Abdallah, C.T., & Lewis, F. (2012a). A binary consensus approach to decentralized coordination of nonholonomic sensor networks. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decisionand Control (CDC 2012) (pp. 3353–3359). Maui, HI, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Luna, J.M., Fierro, R., Abdallah, C.T., & Wood, J. (2012b). An adaptive coverage control for deployment of nonholonomic mobile sensor networks over time-varying density functions. Asian Journal of Control. doi: 10.1002/asjc.636.
   Google Scholar
• Marcelloni, F., & Vecchio, M. (2008). A simple algorithm for data compression in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 12, 411–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastellone, S., Mejia, J.S., Stipanović, D.M., & Spong, M.W. (2011). Formation control and coordinated tracking via asymptotic decoupling for lagrangian multi-agent systems. Automatica, 47, 2355–2363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matveev, A.S., Teimoori, H., & Savkin, A.V. (2012). Method for tracking of environmental level sets by a unicycle-like vehicle. Automatica, 48, 2252–2261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfati-Saber, R. (2004). Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49, 1520–1533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfati-Saber, R. (2006). Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: Algorithms and theory. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 51, 401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimenta, L.C.A., Schwager, M., Lindsey, Q., Kumar, V., Rus, D., Mesquita, R.C., & Pereira, G.A.S. (2010). Simultaneous coverage and tracking (SCAT) of moving targets with robot networks. In Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics VIII, edited by G.S. Chirikjian, H. Choset, M. Morales & T. Murphey (pp. 85–99). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, W., & Atkins, E.M. (2007). Distributed multi-vehicle coordinated control via local information exchange. International Journal in Robust and Nonlinear Control, 17, 1002–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwager, M., Rus, D., & Slotine, J.J.E. (2009). Decentralized, adaptive control for coverage with networked robots. International Journal of Robotics Research, 28, 357–375.
   Google Scholar
• Slotine, J.J.E., & Li, W. (1991). Applied nonlinear control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Spletzer, J., Das, A.K., Fierro, R., Taylor, C.J., Kumar, V., & Ostrowski, J.P. (2001). Cooperative localization and control for multi-robot manipulation. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 631–636). Maui, HI, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Susca, S., Martínez, S., & Bullo, F. (2008). Monitoring environmental boundaries with a robotic sensor network. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 16, 288–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, H.G., Jadbabaie, A., & Pappas, G. (2007). Flocking in fixed and switching networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52, 863–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Wu, X., Yu, W., Small, M., & Lu, J. (2012). Flocking of multi-agent dynamical systems based on pseudo-leader mechanism. Systems and Control Letters, 61, 195–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv, J., & Lempel, A. (1977). A universal algorithm for sequential data compression. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-23, 337–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar