Continuous-time system identification of the steering dynamics of a ship on a river

References

• Anderson, B.D.O., & Moore, J.B. (1989). Optimal control: Linear quadratic methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Åström, K., & Källström, C. (1976). Identification of ship steering dynamics. Automatica, 12, 9–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastogne, T., Garnier, H., & Sibille, P. (2001). A PMF-based subspace method for continuous-time model identification: Application to a multivariable winding process. International Journal of Control, 74(2), 118–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzler, S. (2008). Modellierung und Identifikation eines Binnenschiffes (Studienarbeit) [Modeling and identification of an inland vessel] (Thesis). Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, R. (in press). Modellbasierte Bahnführung von Binnenschiffen [Model-based track-keeping for inland vessels] (Doctoral dissertation). Otto von Guericke Universität, Magdeburg.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, R., Driescher, A., & Gilles, E.D. (2002). Entwurf einer Vorsteuerung zur hochgenauen Bahnführung von Binnenschiffen [Development of a feedforward controller for accurate track-keeping of inland vessels]. In 3Wismarer Automatisierungssymposium, Wismar.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, R., Driescher, A., & Gilles, E.D. (2003). Drift dynamics modeling for automatic track-keeping of inland vessels. In V.G. Peshekhonov (Ed.), 10th Saint Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems (pp. 218–227). Saint Petersburg: State Research Center of the Russian Federation “Elektropribor”.
   Google Scholar
• Blanke, M., & Knudsen, M. (1999). Optimized experiment design for identification of marine systems. In Proceedings of 14th IFAC World Congress, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Bolk, S. (2004). Entwurf einer LQG-Regelung zur Bahnführung von Binnenschiffen (Diplomarbeit) [Development of an LQG controller for track-keeping of inland vessels] (Thesis). Max-Planck-Institut für Dynamik komplexer technischer Systeme, Magdeburg.
   Google Scholar
• Dayal, B., & MacGregor, J. (1997). Multi-output process identification. Journal of Process Control, 7, 269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossen, T.I. (1994). Guidance and control of ocean vehicles. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fossen, T.I. (2002). Marine control systems. Trondheim: Marine Cybernetics.
   Google Scholar
• Fujino, M. (1976). Maneuverability in restricted waters: State of the art (Technical report 184). Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, The University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://pocarisweat.umdl.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/91725
   Google Scholar
• Garnier, H., Mensler, M., & Richard, A. (2003). Continuous-time model identification from sampled data: Implementation issues and performance evaluation. International Journal of Control, 76(13), 1337–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier, H., & Wang, L. (2008). Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gronarz, A. (1997). Rechnerische Simulation der Schiffsbewegung beim Manövrieren unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Abhängigkeit von der Wassertiefe [Numerical simulation of the ship's motion in manoeuvres with special consideration of the dependency of the water depth] (Thesis). Gerhard-Mercator-Universität Gesamthochschule, Duisburg. Retrieved from http://duepublico.uni-duisburg- essen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-5111/inhalt.htm
   Google Scholar
• Herzer, B. (in press). Die automatische Bahnführung von Schiffen mit nichtminimalphasiger Dynamik [Automatic track-keeping of ships with non-minimum phase dynamics] (Doctoral dissertation). Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Herzer, B., & Gilles, E.D. (2010). Disturbance estimation for feedforward control of inland vessels. 8th IFAC Conference on Control Applications in Marine Systems. Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Laurain, V., Gilson, M., Tóth, R., & Garnier, H. (2010). Refined instrumental variable methods for the identification of LPV Box-Jenkins models. Automatica, 46, 959–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurain, V., Tóth, R., Gilson, M., & Garnier, H. (2011). Direct identification of continuous-time linear parameter-varying input/output models. IET Control Theory and Applications, 5(7), 878–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L.H., & Poolla, K. (1996, December). Identification of linear parameter varying systems via LFTs. In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.H., & Poolla, K. (1999). Identification of linear parameter-varying systems using nonlinear programming. Journal Of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, 121, 71–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljung, L. (2009). Experiments with identification of continuous time models. 15th IFAC Symposium of System Identification, Saint-Malo, France.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, A. (2011). Kollisionserkennung und -vermeidung auf Binnenwasserstraßen [Collision detection and avoidance on inland waterways] (Thesis). Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart. Retrieved from http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/ volltexte/2011/6399/
   Google Scholar
• Mensler, M., Garnier, H., Richard, A., & Sibille, P. (1999). Comparison of sixteen continuous-time identification methods with the CONTSID toolbox. 5th European Control Conference, Karlsruhe, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Mensler, M., Joe, S., & Kawabe, T. (2006). Identification of a toroidal continuously variable transmission using continuous-time system identification methods. Control Engineering Practice, 14, 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J.N. (1977). Marine hydrodynamics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nomoto, K., Taguchi, T., Honda, K., & Hirano, S. (1957). On the steering qualities of ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, 4, 354–370.
   Google Scholar
• Norrbin, N. (1970). Theory and observation on the use of a mathematical model for ship maneuvering in deep and confined waters. Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Pannocchia, G., & Rawlings, J. (2003). Disturbance models for offset-free model predictive control. AIChE Journal, 49(2), 426–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, G., & Unbehauen, H. (2006). Identification of continuous-time systems. Control Theory and Applications, IEE Proceedings, 153(2), 185–220.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings, J., & Ekerdt, J. (2002). Chemical reactor analysis and design fundamentals. Madison, WI: Nob Hill Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Seber, G., & Wild, C. (1988). Nonlinear regression. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Skjetne, R., Smogeli, O., & Fossen, T. (2004). A nonlinear ship manoeuvering model: Identification and adaptive control with experiments for a model ship. Modeling Identification and Control, 25, 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström, T., & Stoica, P. (1989). System identification. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tiano, A., & Blanke, M. (1997). Multivariable identification of ship steering and roll motions. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 19, 63–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaegen, M., & Verdult, V. (2007). Filtering and system identification: A least squares approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl, A. (2001). Einsatz optimaler Regelverfahren zur automatischen Bahnführung [Application of optimal control methods for automatic track-keeping]. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P. (2011). Recursive estimation and time-series analysis: An introduction for the student and practitioner. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P., Garnier, H., & Gilson, M. (2006). An optimal instrumental variable approach for identifying hybrid continuous-time Box-Jenkins models. IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Newcastle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P., & Jakeman, A. (1979). Refined instrumental variable methods of time series analysis: Part I, SISO systems. International Journal of Control, 29, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, R. (2000). Repräsentation dynamischer Schiffsmodelle in einem Navigationssystem für die Binnenschiffahrt [Representation of ship dynamics models in a navigation system for inland navigation]. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar