Passivity-based control of robotic manipulators for safe cooperation with humans

References

• Albu-Schäffer, A., Ott, C., & Hirzinger, G. (2007). A unified passivity-based control framework for position, torque and impedance control of flexible joint robots. International Journal of Robotic Research, 26, 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetz, M., Arbuckle, T., Belker, T., Bennewitz, M., Burgard, W., Cremers, A.B., …Schulz, D. (2001). Integrated plan-based control of autonomous service robots in human environments. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16, 56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicchi, A., & Tonietti, G. (2004). Fast and soft-arm tactics [robot arm design]. Robotics Automation Magazine, IEEE, 11, 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomdell, A., Dressler, I., Nilsson, K., & Robertsson, A. (2010). Flexible application development and high-performance motion control based on external sensing and reconfiguration of ABB industrial robot controllers. Workshop on innovative robot control architectures for semanding (research) applications. Anchorage, AK.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, O., & Khatib, O. (2002). Elastic strips: A framework for motion generation in human environments. International Journal of Robotics Research, 21, 1031–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, M., Grioli, G., Garabini, M., Belo, F., Di Basco, A., Tsagarakis, N., & Bicchi, A. (2012). A variable damping module for variable impedance actuation. International conference of robotics and automation, ICRA (pp. 2666–2672). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• De Medio, C., & Oriolo, G. (1991). Robot obstacle avoidance using vortex fields. In S. Stifter & J. Lenarcic (Eds.), Advances in robot kinematics (pp. 227–235). Wien, Austria: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gadd, C.W. (1966). Use of weighted-impulse criterion for estimating injury hazard. Car crash conference (pp. 164–174). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Haddadin, S., Belder, R., & Albu-Schaffer, A. (2011). Dynamic motion planning for robots in partially unknown environments. IFAC world congress (pp. 6842–6850). Milano, Italy: IFAC.
   Google Scholar
• Haddadin, S., Urbanek, H., Parusel, S., Burschka, D., Rossmann, J., Albu-Schaffer, A., & Hirzinger, G. (2010). Real-time reactive motion generation based on variable attractor dynamics and shaped velocities. IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS (pp. 3109–3116). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Heinzmann, J., & Zelinsky, A. (2003). Quantitative safety guarantees for physical human-robot interaction. International Journal of Robotics Research, 22, 479–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirzinger, G., Albu-Schäffer, A., Hahnle, M., Schaefer, I., & Sporer, N. (2001). On a new generation of torque controlled light-weight robots. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA (pp. 3356–3363). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, N. (1985). Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part III-applications. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, 107, 17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikuta, K., Ishii, H., & Nokata, M. (2003). Safety evaluation method of design and control for human-care robots. International Journal of Robotics Research, 22, 281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, X., & Wang, Y. (2004). Local minima-free design of artificial coordinating fields. Journal of Control Theory and Applications, 2, 371–380.
   Google Scholar
• Kazerooni, H. (1989). Compliant motion control for robot manipulators. International Journal of Control, 49, 745–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, H.K. (2002). Nonlinear systems. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Khatib, O. (1985). Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. IEEE International conference on robotics and automation, ICRA (pp. 500–505). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Khosla, P. (1992). Real-time obstacle avoidance using harmonic potential functions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 8, 338–349.
   Google Scholar
• Koditschek, D. (1987). Exact robot navigation by means of potential functions: Some topological considerations. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA (pp. 412–442). Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Koditschek, D., & Rimon, E. (1990). Robot navigation functions on manifolds with boundary. Advanced Applied Mathematics, 11, 412–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugi, A., Ott, C., Albu-Schäffer, A., & Hirzinger, G. (2008). On the passivity-based impedance control of flexible joint robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24, 416–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulic, D., & Croft, E.A. (2005). Safe planning for human-robot interaction. Journal of Robotic Systems, 22, 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulic, D., & Croft, E.A. (2006). Real-time safety for human-robot interaction. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 54, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacevic, B., & Rocco, P. (2010). Kinetostatic danger field - A novel safety assessment for human-robot interaction. IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS (pp. 2169–2174). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lacevic, B., & Rocco, P. (2011a). Closed form solution to controller design for human-robot interaction. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 133(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacevic, B., & Rocco, P. (2011b). Safety-oriented control of robotic manipulators - A kinematic approach. IFAC world congress (pp. 11508–11513). Milano, Italy: IFAC.
   Google Scholar
• Lacevic, B., Rocco, P., & Zanchettin, A. (2013). Safety assessment and control of robotic manipulators using danger field. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, available online.
   Google Scholar
• Masoud, A. (2010). Kinodynamic motion planning: A novel type of nonlinear, passive damping forces and advantages. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 17, 85–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoud, S., & Masoud, A. (2002). Motion planning in the presence of directional and regional avoidance constraints using nonlinear, anisotropic, harmonic potential fields: A physical metaphor. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 32, 705–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijmeijer, H., & van der Schaft, A.J. (1990). Nonlinear dynamical control systems. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nuño, E., Basañez, L., & Ortega, R. (2011). Passivity-based control for bilateral teleoperation: A tutorial. Automatica, 47, 485–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pervez, A., & Ryu, J. (2008). Safe physical human robot interaction-past, present and future. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 22, 469–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimon, E., & Koditschek, D. (1992). Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 8, 501–518.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, K., Townsend, W., Ebrman, B., & DiPietro, D. (1988). Preliminary design of a whole-arm manipulation system (WAMS). IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA. (pp. 254–260). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Siciliano, B., Sciavicco, L., Villani, L., & Oriolo, G. (2009). Robotics modelling, planning and control. Springer-Verlag Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, L., Stephanou, H., & Wen, J. (1996). Real-time robot motion control with circulatory fields. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA (pp. 2737–2742). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Takegaki, M., & Arimoto, S. (1981a). A new feedback method for dynamic control of manipulators. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, 103, 119–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takegaki, M., & Arimoto, S. (1981b). A new feedback method for dynamic control of manipulators, ASME. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 103, 119–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarn, T., Bejczy, A., Isidori, A., & Chen, Y. (1984). Nonlinear feedback in robot arm control. IEEE conference on decision and control (pp. 736–751). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Versace, J. (1971). A review of the severity index. Car crash conference (pp. 771–796). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtara, T., Uchihara, M., Murayama, H., Shimoda, S., Sakai, S., Fujimoto, H., & Kimura, H. (2009). Human-robot collaboration in precise positioning of a three-dimensional object. Automatica, 45, 333–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada, Y., Hirasawa, Y., Huang, S., Umetani, Y., & Suita, K. (1997). Human-robot contact in the safeguarding space. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2, 230–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanchettin, A., Lacevic, B., & Rocco, P. (2012). A novel passivity-based control law for safe human-robot coexistence. IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS (pp. 2276–2281). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, M., Khatib, O., Roth, B., & Salisbury, J. (2004). Playing it safe [human-friendly robots]. Robotics Automation Magazine, IEEE, 11, 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar