Finite-horizon integration for continuous-time identification: bias analysis and application to variable stiffness actuators

References

• Bastogne T., Garnier H., & Sibille P. (2001). A PMF-based subspace method for continuous-time model identification. application to a multivariable winding process. International Journal of Control, 74(2), 118–132. doi: 10.1080/00207170150203471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano M. G., Grioli G., Garabini M., Bonomo F., Mancini M., Tsagarakis N., & Bicchi A. (2011). VSA-cubebot: A modular variable stiffness platform for multiple degrees of freedom robots. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (pp. 5090–5095), Shangai, China.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel-Berhe S., & Unbehauen H. (1998). Bilinear continuous-time systems identification via hartley-based modulating functions. Automatica, 34(4), 499–503. doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00216-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Santina C., Piazza C., Gasparri G. M., Bonilla M., Catalano M. G., Grioli G., & Bicchi A. (2017). The quest for natural machine motion: An open platform to fast-prototyping articulated soft robots. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 24(1), 48–56. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2016.2636366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier H. (2015). Direct continuous-time approaches to system identification. overview and benefits for practical applications. European Journal of control, 24, 50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier H., Gilson M., Young P. C., & Huselstein E. (2007). An optimal IV technique for identifying continuous-time transfer function model of multiple input systems. Control engineering practice, 15(4), 471–486. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier H., Mensler M., & Richard A. (2003). Continuous-time model identification from sampled data: implementation issues and performance evaluation. International journal of Control, 76(13), 1337–1357. doi: 10.1080/0020717031000149636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier H., & Wang L. (2008). Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data (1st ed.). London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Garnier H., & Young P. (2014a). The advantages of directly identifying continuous-time transfer function models in practical applications. International Journal of Control, 87(7), 1319–1338. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2013.840053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier H., & Young P. C. (2012). What does continuous-time model identification have to offer?. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45(16), 810–815. doi: 10.3182/20120711-3-BE-2027.00233
   Google Scholar
• Garnier H., & Young P. C. (2014b). Special issue on applications of continuous-time model identification and estimation. International Journal of Control.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jemni A., & Trigeassou J. C. (1996). A comparative study of the deterministic accuracy of two identification methods for continuous systems. IMACS Multiconference: Computational engineering in systems applications (pp. 488–493). Lille, France.
   Google Scholar
• Lataire J., Pintelon R., Piga D., & Tóth R. (2017). Continuous-time linear time-varying system identification with a frequency-domain kernel-based estimator. IET Control Theory Applications, 11(4), 457–465. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2016.0385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennart L., & Singh R. (2012). Version 8 of the MATLAB system identification toolbox. 16th IFAC symposium on system identification (pp. 1826–1831). Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Ljung L. (1999). System identification, theory for the user. Prentince Hall: Upper Saddle River.
   Google Scholar
• Mercère G., Palsson H., & Poinot T. (2011). Continuous-time linear parameter-varying identification of a cross flow heat exchanger: a local approach. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 19(1), 64–76. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2010.2071874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla A., Garnier H., & Gilson M. (2015). Version 7.0 of the CONTSID toolbox. 17th IFAC symposium on system identification. Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Patra A., & Unbehauen H. (1995). Identification of a class of nonlinear continuous-time systems using Hartley modulating functions. International Journal of Control, 62(6), 1431–1451. doi: 10.1080/00207179508921607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poli R., Kennedy J., & Blackwell T. (2007). Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intelligence, 1(1), 33–57. doi: 10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0
   Google Scholar
• Rao G. P., & Garnier H. (2002). Numerical illustrations of the relevance of direct continuous-time model identification. 15th triennial IFAC world congress on automatic control (pp. 133–138).
   Google Scholar
• Rao G. P., & Unbehauen H. (2006). Identification of continuous-time systems. IEE Proceedings-Control Theory and Applications, 153(2), 185–220. doi: 10.1049/ip-cta:20045250
   Google Scholar
• Sagara S., & Zhao Z. Y. (1990). Numerical integration approach to on-line identification of continuous-time systems. Automatica, 26(1), 63–74. doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(90)90158-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanghong H., & Jue Z. (2004). Identification of linear continuous-time system using wavelet modulating filters. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 15(3), 270–277.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha N. K., & Rao G. P. (1991). Identification of continuous-time systems. Methodology and computer implementation (Vol. 161). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström T., & Stoica P. (1983). Instrumental variable methods for system identification (Vol. 161). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Young P. C., & Garnier H. (2006). Identification and estimation of continuous-time, data-based mechanistic (DBM) models for environmental systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(8), 1055–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young P., & Jakeman A. (1980). Refined instrumental variable methods of recursive time-series analysis part III. Extensions. International Journal of Control, 31(4), 741–764. doi: 10.1080/00207178008961080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar