Optimal feedback input design for dynamic nonlinear systems

References

• Albalasie, A., Seliger, G., & Hanieh, A. A. (2016). Using adaptive model predictive technique to control underactuated robot and minimize energy consumption. Procedia CIRP, 40, 407–412. 13th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing – Decoupling Growth from Resource Use. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.080
   Google Scholar
• Alessandri, A., Baglietto, M., & Battistelli, G. (2003). Receding-horizon estimati on for discrete-time linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(3), 473–478. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2003.809155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessandri, A., Baglietto, M., & Battistelli, G. (2008). Moving-horizon state estimation for nonlinear discrete-time systems: New stability results and approximation schemes. Automatica, 44(7), 1753–1765. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessandri, A., Baglietto, M., Battistelli, G., & Gaggero, M. (2011). Moving-horizon state estimation for nonlinear systems using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 22(5), 768–780. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2011.2116803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessandri, A., Baglietto, M., Battistelli, G., & Zoppoli, R. (2008). Moving-horizon state estimation for nonlinear systems using neural networks. 2008 47th IEEE conference on decision and control, Cancun, Mexico (pp. 2557–2562).
   Google Scholar
• Alonge, F., Cangemi, T., D'Ippolito, F., Fagiolini, A., & Sferlazza, A. (2015). Convergence analysis of extended kalman filter for sensorless control of induction motor. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(4), 2341–2352. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2014.2355133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annergren, M., Larsson, C. A., Hjalmarsson, H., Bombois, X., & Wahlberg, B. (2017). Application-oriented input design in system identification: Optimal input design for control [applications of control]. IEEE Control Systems, 37(2), 31–56. doi: 10.1109/MCS.2016.2643243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babar, M. Z., & Baglietto, M. (2016). MPC based optimal input design for nonlinear system identification. 2016 20th international conference on system theory, control and computing (ICSTCC), Sinaia, Romania (pp. 619–625).
   Google Scholar
• Baglietto, M., Paolucci, M., Scardovi, L., & Zoppoli, R. (2002). Information-based multi-agent exploration. Proceedings of the third international workshop on robot motion and control, 2002. RoMoCo '02, Bukowy Dworek, Poland (pp. 173–179).
   Google Scholar
• Baglietto, M., Scardovi, L., & Zoppoli, R. (2004). Active identification of unknown systems: An information theoretic approach. Proceedings of the 2004 American control conference, Boston, MA, USA (Vol. 4, pp. 3826–3830).
   Google Scholar
• Belforte, G., & Gay, P. (2003). Optimal input design for set-membership identification of hammerstein models. International Journal of Control, 76(3), 217–225. doi: 10.1080/0020717031000067439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besançon, G. (1999). A viewpoint on observability and observer design for nonlinear systems. In H. Nijmeijer & T. Fossen (Eds.), New Directions in nonlinear observer design (pp. 3–22). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., & Jain, H. (2014). An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part i: Solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 18(4), 577–601. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denisov, V. I., Chubich, V. M., & Chernikova, O. S. (2014). Active parametric identification of stochastic linear discrete system based on optimal design of input signals and initial states. 2014 12th international conference on actual problems of electronics instrument engineering (APEIE), Novosibirsk, Russia (pp. 574–579).
   Google Scholar
• Donev, A., Atkinson, A., & Tobias, R. (2007). Optimum experimental designs, with SAS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth, S., & Jothilakshmi, R. (2014). Convergence analysis of extended kalman filter in a noisy environment through difference equations. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 91, 33–41. doi: 10.12732/ijpam.v91i1.4
   Google Scholar
• Forgione, M., & Bombois, X. (2015). Data-driven model improvement for model-based control. Automatica, 52, 118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatto, G., Marongiu, I., & Serpi, A. (2013). Discrete-time parameter identification of a surface-mounted permanent magnet synchronous machine. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60(11), 4869–4880. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2012.2221113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers, M. (1992). Connecting identification and robust control: A new challenge. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 25(15), 1–10. 9th IFAC/IFORS Symposium on Identification and System Parameter Estimation 1991, Budapest, Hungary, 8–12 July 1991. doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)50604-7
   Google Scholar
• Gevers, M., & Ljung, L. (1986). Optimal experiment designs with respect to the intended model application. Automatica, 22(5), 543–554. doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(86)90064-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. C., Murdoch, J. C., & Payne, R. L. (1973). Optimal test signal design for linear s.i.s.o. system identification. International Journal of Control, 17(1), 45–55. doi: 10.1080/00207177308932357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, G., Messina, M. J., Tuna, S. E., & Teel, A. R. (2003). Nominally robust model predictive control with state constraints. 42nd IEEE international conference on decision and control, Maui, HI, USA (Vol. 2, pp. 1413–1418).
   Google Scholar
• Han, Y., & Kim, Y. (2011). Optimal input design for online parameter estimation for aircraft with multiple control surfaces. Engineering Optimization, 43(5), 559–580. doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2010.502937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiberger, R. M., Bhaumik, D. K., & Holland, B. (1993). Optimal data augmentation strategies for additive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423), 926–938. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1993.10476360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, R., & Krener, A. (1977). Nonlinear controllability and observability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 22(5), 728–740. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1977.1101601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R., Patwardhan, S. C., & Biegler, L. T. (2012). Robust stability of nonlinear model predictive control based on extended kalman filter. Journal of Process Control, 22(1), 82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (1982). The common parameter estimation basis of adaptive filtering, identification, and control. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 30(4), 587–595. doi: 10.1109/TASSP.1982.1163934
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, S., Moon, U. C., & Park, J. C. (2014). Predictive-control-based direct power control with an adaptive parameter identification technique for improved afe performance. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 29(11), 6178–6187. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2014.2298041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, C. A., Annergren, M., Hjalmarsson, H., Rojas, C. R., Bombois, X., Mesbah, A., & Modén, P. E. (2013). Model predictive control with integrated experiment design for output error systems. 2013 European control conference (ECC), Zurich, Switzerland (pp. 3790–3795).
   Google Scholar
• Lëuter, E. (1974). Experimental design in a class of models. Mathematische Operationsforschung und Statistik, 5(4–5), 379–398. doi: 10.1080/02331887408801175
   Google Scholar
• Levin, M. (1960). Optimum estimation of impulse response in the presence of noise. IRE Transactions on Circuit Theory, 7(1), 50–56. doi: 10.1109/TCT.1960.1086622
   Google Scholar
• Limon, D., Alamo, T., Salas, F., & Camacho, E. (2006a). Input to state stability of min-max MPC controllers for nonlinear systems with bounded uncertainties. Automatica, 42(5), 797–803. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2006.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limon, D., Alamo, T., Salas, F., & Camacho, E. F. (2006b). On the stability of constrained mpc without terminal constraint. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 51(5), 832–836. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2006.875014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, L., Nicolao, G. D., & Scattolini, R. (2004). On the stabilization of nonlinear discrete?time systems with output feedback. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 14(17), 1379–1391. doi: 10.1002/rnc.952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, L., & Scattolini, R. (2007). Robustness and robust design of MPC for nonlinear discrete-time systems (pp. 239–254). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marafioti, G., Olaru, S., & Hovd, M. (2009). State estimation in nonlinear model predictive control, unscented kalman filter advantages. In L. Magni, D. M. Raimondo, & F. Allgöwer (Eds.), Nonlinear model predictive control: Towards new challenging applications (pp. 305–313). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo, T., & Lipo, T. A. (1985). A rotor parameter identification scheme for vector-controlled induction motor drives. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, IA-21(3), 624–632. doi: 10.1109/TIA.1985.349719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayne, D., Rawlings, J., Rao, C., & Scokaert, P. (2000). Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica, 36(6), 789–814. doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00214-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska, H., & Mayne, D. Q. (1995). Moving horizon observers and observer-based control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40(6), 995–1006. doi: 10.1109/9.388677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potters, M. G., Bombois, X., Forgione, M., Modén, P. E., Lundh, M., Hjalmarsson, H., & Van den Hof, P. M. J. (2014). Optimal experiment design in closed loop with unknown, nonlinear and implicit controllers using stealth identification. 2014 European control conference (ECC), Strasbourg, France (pp. 726–731).
   Google Scholar
• Qian, J., Nadri, M., & Dufour, P. (2017). Optimal input design for parameter estimation of nonlinear systems: Case study of an unstable delta wing. International Journal of Control, 90(4), 873–887. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2016.1225990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rady, E. A., El-Monsef, M. M. E. A., & Seyam, M. M. (2009). Relationships among several optimality criteria. Interstat, 15, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, S. S. (2009). Engineering optimization: Theory and practice (pp. 380–491). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rastegarpour, S., Shahmansoorian, A., & Mazinan, A. H. (2013). Designing an optimal control law for nonlinear system by using intelligent algorithm. 2013 International conference on measurement, information and control (ICMIC), Harbin, China (Vol. 2, pp. 830–836).
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. K., & Verhaegen, M. (2011). Efficient system identification of heterogeneous distributed systems via a structure exploiting extended kalman filter. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 56(7), 1713–1718. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2011.2126690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardovi, L., Baglietto, M., & Parisini, T. (2007). Active state estimation for nonlinear systems: A neural approximation approach. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 18(4), 1172–1184. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2007.899251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singhal, S., & Wu, L. (1989). Advances in neural information processing systems (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thrun, S., Burgard, W., & Fox, D. (2005). Probabilistic robotics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ungarala, S., Dolence, E., & Li, K. (2007). Constrained extended kalman filter for nonlinear state estimation. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 40(5), 63–68. doi: 10.3182/20070606-3-MX-2915.00058
   Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, P. (2009). Applied optimization with MATLAB programming. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, P., Xia, B., & Luo, X. (2017). Parameter estimation and convergence analysis for a class of canonical dynamic systems by extended kalman filter. 2017 3rd IEEE international conference on control science and systems engineering (ICCSSE), Beijing, China (pp. 336–340).
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., Chen, L., Zhang, R., & Wang, K. (2016). From static to dynamic tag population estimation: An extended kalman filter perspective. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 64(11), 4706–4719. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2592524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrop, M. B. (1981). Optimal input design for the identification of linear multivariable systems with disjoint parametrization. International Journal of Control, 34(2), 315–331. doi: 10.1080/00207178108922532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Huang, B., Su, H., & Chu, J. (2012). Prediction error method for identification of LPV models. Journal of Process Control, 22(1), 180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar