A novel nonlinear model predictive control strategy and its application to maglev ball system

References

• Augustine, M. T., & Patil, D. U. (2023). A practically stabilizing model predictive control scheme for switched affine systems. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 7, 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCSYS.2022.3210368
   Google Scholar
• Bächle, T., Hentzelt, S., & Graichen, K. (2013). Nonlinear model predictive control of a magnetic levitation system. Control Engineering Practice, 21(9), 1250–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamimore, A. (2023). Application of gap metric for model selection in linear parameter varying model-based predictive control. Journal of Control and Decision, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/23307706.2023.2288639
   Google Scholar
• Couchman, P., Kouvaritakis, B., & Cannon, M. (2006). LTV models in MPC for sustainable development. International Journal of Control, 79(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207170500472867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondhalekar, R., & Imura, J.-I. (2010). Least-restrictive move-blocking model predictive control. Automatica, 46(7), 1234–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y. D., Lu, Z. L., Ling, K. V., Liao, W. H., & Zhang, X. (2022). Multiplexed MPC attitude control of a moving mass satellite using dual-rate piecewise affine model. Aerospace Science and Technology, 128, 107778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107778
   Google Scholar
• Huang, K. K., Wei, K., Li, F. B., Yang, C. H., & Gui, W. H. (2023). LSTM-MPC: A deep learning based predictive control method for multimode process control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 70(11), 11544–11554. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2022.3229323
   Google Scholar
• Kang, T., Peng, H., Zhou, F., Tian, X., & Peng, X. (2021). Robust predictive control of coupled water tank plant. Applied Intelligence, 51(8), 5726–5744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02083-7
   Google Scholar
• Lawrynczuk, M. (2016). Nonlinear predictive control of dynamic systems represented by wiener-hammerstein models. Nonlinear Dynamics, 86(2), 1193–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2957-0
   Google Scholar
• Morales, R., Feliu, V., & Sira-Ramírez, H. (2011). Nonlinear control for magnetic levitation systems based on fast online algebraic identification of the input gain. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 19(4), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2010.2057511
   Google Scholar
• Ong, C.-J., & Wang, Z. (2014). Reducing variables in model predictive control of linear system with disturbances using singular value decomposition. Systems & Control Letters, 71, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S., Dourla, V., Dwivedi, P., & Junghare, A. (2019). Introduction and realization of four fractional-order sliding mode controllers for nonlinear open-loop unstable system: A magnetic levitation study case. Nonlinear Dynamics, 98(1), 601–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05216-x
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., Kim, T. H., & Sugie, T. (2011). Output feedback model predictive control for LPV systems based on quasi-min-max algorithm. Automatica, 47(9), 2052–2058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2011.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patikirikorala, T., Wang, L. P., Colman, A., & Han, J. (2012). Hammerstein-Wiener nonlinear model based predictive control for relative QoS performance and resource management of software systems. Control Engineering Practice, 20(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, H., Ozaki, T., Haggan-Ozaki, V., & Toyoda, Y. (2003). A parameter optimization method for radial basis function type models. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14(2), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2003.809395
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng, H., Ozaki, T., Toyoda, Y., Shioya, H., Nakano, K., Haggan-Ozaki, V., & Mori, M. (2004). RBF-ARX model-based nonlinear system modeling and predictive control with application to a NOx decomposition process. Control Engineering Practice, 12(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(03)00050-9
   Google Scholar
• Pipino, H. A., Cappelletti, C. A., & Adam, E. J. (2021). Adaptive multi-model predictive control applied to continuous stirred tank reactor. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 145, 107195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.107195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. B. (1980). State-dependent models: A general approach to nonlinear time series analysis. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 1(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1980.tb00300.x
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Y., Peng, H., Ruan, W., Wu, J., & Gao, J. (2014). A modeling and control approach to magnetic levitation system based on state-dependent ARX model. Journal of Process Control, 24(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.10.016
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, J. A., & Haber, R. (2015). The effect of coincidence horizon on predictive functional control. Processes, 3(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr3010025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sain, D. (2019). Real-time implementation and performance analysis of robust 2-DOF PID controller for Maglev system using pole search technique. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 15, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2018.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzmann, T., Kaufmann, E., Arrizabalaga, J., Pavone, M., Scaramuzza, D., & Ryll, M. (2023). Real-time neural MPC: Deep learning model predictive control for quadrotors and agile robotic platforms. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 8(4), 2397–2404. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2023.3246839
   Google Scholar
• Sangi, R., Kümpel, A., & Müller, D. (2019). Real-life implementation of a linear model predictive control in a building energy system. Journal of Building Engineering, 22, 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, R. C., & Manzie, C. (2015). Optimal move blocking strategies for model predictive control. Automatica, 61, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2015.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbino, V., & Sathiyavathi, S. (2019). Design of sliding mode controller for magnetic levitation system. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 78, 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L. L., Chen, Z. X., Gao, Q. H., & Liu, J. F. (2024). Performance recovery of uncertain nonaffine systems by active disturbance rejection control. Measurement and Control, 57(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940221139583
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, G., Lopez, F. R., Garcia, C. D., Orrante, J. A., & Hoyo, J. A. (2017). An improved move-blocking strategy in predictive control for setpoint tracking. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 15(5), 806–812. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2017.7910192
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. P. (2004). Discrete model predictive controller design using Laguerre functions. Journal of Process Control, 14(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-1524(03)00028-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Chen, L., & Xu, Q. (2022). Disturbance estimation-based robust model predictive position tracking control for magnetic levitation system. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 27(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2021.3058256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. P., & Young, P. C. (2006). An improved structure for model predictive control using non-minimal state space realisation. Journal of Process Control, 16(4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2005.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., Zhang, Y. K., Xia, C. P., Li, Y. L., & Gong, J. H. (2022). Dynamic analysis of high-speed maglev train-bridge system with fuzzy proportional-integral-derivative control. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 41(1), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484211029133
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Peng, H., Chen, Q., & Peng, X. (2014). Modeling and control approach to a distinctive quadrotor helicopter. ISA Transactions, 53(1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2013.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Peng, H., Ohtsu, K., Kitagawa, G., & Itoh, T. (2012). Ship’s tracking control based on nonlinear time series model. Applied Ocean Research, 36, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2012.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, Y.-G., Li, D.-W., & Lin, S. (2013). Model predictive control–status and challenges. Acta Automatica Sinica, 39(3), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-1029(13)60024-5
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, X., Peng, H., Wu, J., & Wei, J. (2014). Quad-rotor modeling and attitude control using state-dependent Arx Type Model. Asian Journal of Control, 16(5), 1403–1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. T., Li, H. X., & Chen, G. R. (2008). Dual-mode predictive control algorithm for constrained Hammerstein systems. International Journal of Control, 81(10), 1609–1625. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207170701885453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., Xue, A., Wang, S., & Ren, Z. (2011). An improved model predictive control approach based on extended non-minimal state space formulation. Journal of Process Control, 21(8), 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.06.009
   Google Scholar