Perceptions of environmental compensation in different scientific fields

References

• Darbi, M., Ohlenburg, H., Herberg, A., Skambracks, D., and Herbert, M.,, 2009, International Approaches to Compensation for Impacts on Biodiversity: Final Report, (Dresden: Leibniz Institute, Berlin University of Technology).
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, B., 2005, Environmental Offset Policies, Principles, and Methods: A Review of Selected Legislative Frameworks (Radolfzell: Biodiversityneutralinitiative).
   Google Scholar
• Rundcrantz, K. and Skärbäck, E., 2003, Environmental compensation in planning: a review of five different countries with major emphasis on the German system. European Environment, 13(4), 204–226.
   Google Scholar
• BBOP, 2009, Biodiversity Offset Design Handbook (Washington: Buisiness and Biodiversity Offset programme).
   Google Scholar
• Beder, S., 2006, Environmental Principles and Policies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction (Sterling: Earthscan).
   Google Scholar
• Persson, J., 2011, Att förstå miljökompensation [To Understand Environmental Compensation] [in Swedish] (Göteborg: Melica Media).
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., 1997, Stretching the limits: environmental compensation, habitat creation and sustainable development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(3), 292–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohan, M.J., 2000, A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(3), 255–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S.H., 1992, Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: M. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (New York: Academic Press), Vol. 25, 1–65
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R.L., 1992, Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University).
   Google Scholar
• Kempton, W., Boster, J.S. and Hartley, J.A., 1995, Environmental Values in American Culture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A., 1983, The Nine American Lifestyles: Who We Are and Where We’re Going (New York: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R.K., 1998, Environmental Impact Assessment: A Methodological Perspective (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
   Google Scholar
• Firth, L.J., 1998, Professional practice. Role of values in public decision-making: where is the fit? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 16(4), 325–329.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, W.E., 2002, Continuity in a changing environmental discourse: film depictions of corps of engineers projects in South Florida. Geo Journal, 69, 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Pim, V., et al., 2010, Stakeholder value orientations in water management. Society and Natural Resources, 23(9), 805–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, E., 1979, Psychological Anthropology: An Introduction to Human Nature and Cultural Differences (New York: Holt).
   Google Scholar
• Blåsjö, M., 2004, Studenters skrivande i två kunskapsbyggande miljöer [Students’ Writing in Two Knowledge-constructing Settings] [in Swedish]. Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International).
   Google Scholar
• Cherryholmes, C.H., 1992, Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism. Educational Researcher, 21(6), 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J.B., 2006, Communicating Nature: How We Create and Understand Environmental Messages (Washington, DC: Island Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., 2000, Environmental compensation and the mediation of environmental change: making capital out of Cardiff Bay. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(5), 689–710.
   Google Scholar
• Cuperus, R., Bakermans, M.M.G.J.,Udo De Haes, H.A. and Canters,K.J.,, 2001, Ecological compensation in Dutch highway planning. Environmental Management, 27(1), 75–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. and Shaw, T., 1994, Changing meanings of ‘environment’ in the British planning system. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19(4), 425–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, P., 2007, Kompensationsprincipens användning: Lägesbeskrivning och diskussionsunderlag [The use of Compensation as a Principle: State and Basis for Making Decisions] [in Swedish] (Stockholm: Naturskyddsföreningen Stockholms län).
   Google Scholar
• Norton, D.A., 2009, Biodiversity offsets: two New Zealand case studies and an assessment framework. Environmental Management, 43(4), 698–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, J., 2006, Theoretical reflections on the connection between environmental assessment methods and conflict. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(7), 605–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, T., 1976, Environmentalism. Research in Planning and Design (London: Pion).
   Google Scholar
• Austen, E. and Hanson, A., 2008, Identifying wetland compensation principles and mechanisms for Atlantic Canada using a delphi approach. Wetlands, 28(3), 640–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarroya, A., Persson, J. and Puig, J. n.d., Ecological compensation: from general guidance and expertise to specific proposals for road developments. Resubmitted to the Environmental Impact Assessment Review.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register, 2000, Federal Guidance on the Use of In-Lieu-Fee Arrangements for Compensatory Mitigation Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act; Notice, (Washington: Department of the Army Corps of Engineers), pp. 66914–66917.
   Google Scholar
• Ketola, M., Malin, K.,Nyrölä, L. andSuvantola, L., 2009, Kompensaation mahdollisuudet liikennehankkeissa [Compensation in Traffic Projects], Ympäristöministeriö, Suomen Ympäristö [in Finnish] (Helsinki: Miljöministeriet, Finlands miljöcentral).
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C.J., 1997, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction (London: Arnold).
   Google Scholar
• Wathern, P., 1988, Environmental Impact Assessment: Theory And Practice (London: Allen & Unwin).
   Google Scholar
• IAIA. International Association for Impact Assessment homepage, 2009. Available online at: http://www.iaia.org/ ( accessed 4 August 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mmom, P.C. and Igwe, C.F., 2011, An assessment of Nigerian stakeholders’ the perception of environmental offset as mitigation measures and its’ implication for sustainable industrial development in Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4), 314–319.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, P., 1994, Normative planning theory and sustainable development. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 11(3), 145–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T., 1994, Communicative Planning Theory (Aldershot: Avebury).
   Google Scholar
• Buergin, R. and Kessler, C., 2000, Intrusions and exclusions: democratization in Thailand in the context of environmental discourses and resource conflicts. GeoJournal, 52(1), 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, S.P., 1959, Conservation and The Gospel Of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Moment, 1890–1920. Harvard Historical Monographs, 40 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Killingsworth, M.J. and Palmer, J.S., 1992, The environmental impact statement and the rhetoric of democracy. In: L.M. Benton and R.J. Shot (Eds.) Environmental Discourse and Practice (Malden: Blackwell), pp. 156–160.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J.A. 1993, Planning as a rhetorical activity: survey research as a trope in arguments about electric power planning in Chicago. Journal – American Planning Association, 59(3), 334–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, T. and Cowell, R., 2006, Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(4), 359–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, I., 1996, Environmental Impact Assessment in Australia: Theory and Practice (Sidney: The Federation Press).
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T., Tuler, S. and Krueger, R., 2001, What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 27(3), 435–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar