Investigating the impact of anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on animals and plants in the environment: analysis from a systematic map

References

• Verbeek, J., Oftedal, G., Feychting, M., van Rongen, E., Scarfì, M.R., Mann, S., Wong, R. and van Deventer, E., 2021, Prioritizing health outcomes when assessing the effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A survey among experts. Environment international 146, 106300. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106300
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency. 2023, Radiofrequency radiation. Available online at: https://www.arpansa.gov.au/understanding-radiation/what-is-radiation/non-ionising-radiation/radiofrequency-radiation
   Google Scholar
• Bhalla, M.R. and Bhalla, A.V., 2010, Generations of mobile wireless technology: A survey. International Journal of Computer Applications 5(4), 26–32. doi: 10.5120/905-1282
   Google Scholar
• Karipidis, K., Mate, R., Urban, D., Tinker, R. and Wood, A., 2021, 5G mobile networks and health—A state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 31(4), 585–605. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00297-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, T., Rappaport, T.S. and Collins, C.M., 2015, Safe for generations to come. IEEE Microwave Magazine 16(2), 65–84. doi: 10.1109/MMM.2014.2377587
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Deventer, E., van Rongen, E. and Saunders, R., 2011, WHO research agenda for radiofrequency fields. Bioelectromagnetics 32(5), 417–421. doi: 10.1002/bem.20660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaras, T., Leitgeb, N., Auvinen, A., Danker-Hopfe, H., Hansson Mild, K. and Mattsson, M.-O., Norppa, H., Rubin, G.J., Scarfí, M.R., Schüz, J. and Sienkiewicz, Z., 2015, SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks), potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 2020, Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics 118(5), 483–524. doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stam, R., 2018, Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields: (power frequency and radiofrequency fields).
   Google Scholar
• Balmori, A., 2019, Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife. Pathophysiology 16(2–3), 191–199. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Balmori, A., 2015, Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as an emerging threat to wildlife orientation. Science of the Total Environment 518, 58–60. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgamuge, M.N., 2016, Review: Weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phone radiation on plants. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 36(2), 213–235. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2016.1220389
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt, B.B., Lai, H.C. and Manville, A.M., 2022, Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 3. Exposure standards, public policy, laws, and future directions. Reviews on Environmental Health 37(4), 531–558. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0083
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt, B.B., Lai, H.C. and Manville, A.M., 2022, Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, part 1. Rising ambient EMF levels in the environment. Reviews on Environmental Health 37(1), 81–122. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0026
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt, B.B., Lai, H.C. and Manville, A.M., 2022, Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, part 2 impacts: How species interact with natural and man-made EMF. Reviews on Environmental Health 37(3), 327–406. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vian, A., Davies, E., Gendraud, M. and Bonnet, P., 2016, Plant responses to high frequency electromagnetic fields. BioMed Research International 2016, 1830262. doi: 10.1155/2016/1830262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malkemper, E., Tscheulin, T., Vanbergen, A., Vian, A., Balian, E. and Goudeseune, L., (Eds.), 2018, The impacts of artificial electromagnetic radiation on wildlife (flora and fauna). Current knowledge overview: A background document to the web conference a Report of the EKLIPSE Project. http://www.eklipse-mechanism_eu
   Google Scholar
• Cucurachi, S., Tamis, W.L., Vijver, M.G., Peijnenburg, W.J., Bolte, J.F. and de Snoo, G.R., 2013, A review of the ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Environment international 51, 116–140. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karipidis, K., Brzozek, C., Bhatt, C.R., Loughran, S. and Wood, A., 2021, What evidence exists on the impact of anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on animals and plants in the environment? A systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence 10(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13750-021-00252-w
   Google Scholar
• Karipidis, K., Brzozek, C., Mate, R., Bhatt, C.R., Loughran, S. and Wood, A.W., 2023, What evidence exists on the impact of anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on animals and plants in the environment: A systematic map. Environmental Evidence 12(1), 9. doi: 10.1186/s13750-023-00304-3
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N.R., Macura, B., Whaley, P. and Pullin, A.S., 2018, ROSES RepOrting standards for systematic evidence syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence 7, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7
   Google Scholar
• Collaboration for Environmental Evidence, 2018, Guidelines and standards for evidence synthesis in environmental management: Version 5.0. A.S. Pullin, G.K. Frampton, B. Livoreil & G. Petrokofsky (Eds) . Available online at: www.environmentalevidence.org/information-for-authors [accessed 13 July 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Thalheimer, W. and Cook, S., 2002, How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Work-Learning Research 1(9), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayalaxmi and Prihoda, T.J., 2019, Comprehensive review of quality of publications and meta-analysis of genetic damage in mammalian cells exposed to non-ionizing radiofrequency fields. Radiation Research 191(1), 20–30. doi: 10.1667/RR15117.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar