Doing Our Work: Words, Deeds, and Presence

REFERENCES

• Bass, A. (2015). The dialogue of unconsciouses, mutual analysis and the uses of self in contemporary relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 25, 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. (2007). The challenges of leadership in the modern world: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist, 62, 2–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (1999). An intersubjective approach to entitlement. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 68, 441–461. Translated and reprinted in Aperturas Psicoanalíticas (http://www.aperturas.org), No. 6, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (2003). Relational group psychotherapy: From basic assumptions to passion. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (2010a). Resistance, rebellion and refusal in groups: The 3 Rs. London, UK: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (2010b). Modes of therapeutic engagement: Part I: Diplomacy and integrity. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 60, 1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (2010c). Modes of therapeutic engagement: Part II: Sincerity and authenticity. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 60, 29–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (2012). It’s all about me: Introduction to relational group psychotherapy. In J. L. Kleinberg (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of group psychotherapy (pp. 169–185). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (2015). Developing nuclear ideas: Relational group psychotherapy. London & New York: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Billow R. M. (2016a). Psychic nodules and therapeutic impasses: Three case studies. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 66, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (2016b). An irruptive response to Dr. Leszcz’s discussion of R. M. Billow’s Psychic nodules and therapeutic impasses: Three case studies. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 66, 28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (2016c). The therapist dissociates: Psychic nodules and group process. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 66, 261–281.
   Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (in press). Witnessing: The axis of group. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. Doi: 10.1080/00207284.2018.1483196
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups. London, UK: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London, UK: Heinemann. [Reprinted in: Seven Servants: Four works by Wilfred R. Bion. New York: Aronson, l977].
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1965). Transformations. London, UK: Heineman. [Reprinted in: Seven Servants: Four Works by Wilfred R. Bion. New York, NY: Aronson, l977].
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and interpretation. London, UK: Tavistock. [Reprinted in: Seven Servants: Four Works by Wilfred R. Bion. New York: Aronson, l977].
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1973- 1974). Brazilian lectures. In C. Mawson (editor), The complete works of W. R. Bion (Vol. VII, pp. 1–197). London, UK: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1976). Private communication.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1987). Clinical seminars and four papers. (F. Bion, Ed.). Abingdon, England: Fleetwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1999). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought unknown. New York, NY: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, R. (1992). Zen in the art of writing. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. (1982). “Anthem” (song). The future. New York, NY: Columbia Records Albums.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1991). A Derrida reader: Between the blinds. (P. Kamuf, Ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drayton, M. (1896). Idea (poem). In M. F. Crow Ed., Elizabethan sonnet-cycles (Originally published 1594). London, UK: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Foulkes, S. H. (1964). Therapeutic group analysis. London, UK: George Allen.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psycho-analysis. S. E. 12, 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1916). Some character types met with in psycho-Analytic work. S. E., l4, 309–333.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1916- 1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Part III. General theory of the neuroses. SE, 16, 31–447.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. S. E., 18, 67–143.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. SE, 4-5, 1–625.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, S. (2004). The relational unconscious: A core element of intersubjectivity, thirdness, and clinical process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 63–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, R. (2017) Allegro con brio. Book review of Harvey Sachs, Toscanini: Musician of Conscience. New York Times Book Review. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing. July 2, pp. 1, 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Grotstein, J. S. (2003). Introduction: Early Bion. In R. M. Lipgar & M. Pines (Eds.), Building on Bion: Roots (pp. 9–25). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 389–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hullah, P. (2016). We found her hidden: The remarkable poetry of Christina Rossetti. Singapore: Partridge Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. (1991). The use of the self: Countertransference and communication in the analytic situation. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karbelnig, A. (2016). The analyst is present: Viewing the psychoanalytic process as performance art. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33, 153–S172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W. (ed.). (1982). The portable Nietzsche. New York, NY: Viking,Penguin Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Kite, J. (2008). Ideas of influence: The impact of the analyst’s character on the analysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 77, 1075–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (1952). Some theoretical conclusions regarding the emotional life of the infant. In Envy and Gratitude (Vol. 1975, pp.61–93). New York, NY: Delacorte Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1980) Psychoanalysis as art and the fantasy character of the psychoanalytic situation. Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 352–371.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. (1996). Power, authority, and influence in the analytic dyad. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65, 201–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliorati, P. (1989). The image in group relationships. Group Analysis, 22, 189–199.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, A. H. (1976). The holding environment and the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. In R. Langs (Ed.), Classics in psychoanalytic technique (Vol. 1981, pp. 489–498). New York, NY: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Montaigne, M. (1958). The complete essays of Montaigne. (Donald M. Frame, trans.) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nacht, S. (1962). The curative factors in psycho-analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 43, 206–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searles, H. (1975). The patient as therapist to his analyst. In P. Giovacchini (ed), Tactics and techniques in psychoanalytic therapy (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, H. (1957). Notes on symbol formation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78, 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, P. (1992). Women in frames. The gaze, the eye, the profile in Renaissance portraiture. In N. Broude & M. Garrard (eds), The expanding discourse. Feminism and art history (pp. 39–57). New York, NY: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. (2000). Countertransference, conflictual listening, and the analytic object relationship. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, 95–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondheim, S. (1984). Sunday in the park with George (Musical).
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2009). Partners in thought: Working with unformulated experience, dissociation, and enactment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel, P. L. (2011). Therapeutic communication. Knowing what to say when (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J., & Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London, UK: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Zacarro, S. J. (2007). Triad-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 6–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar