Alliance Rupture Detection and Repair in Group Therapy: Using the Group Questionnaire--GQ

REFERENCES

• Agazarian, Y. M. (2018). Systems-centered therapy for groups. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, L. B., & Luborsky, L. (1987). The penn helping alliance scales. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325–356). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Alldredge, C., Burlingame, G., Olsen, J., & Van Epps, J. (2020). Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) progress alert rates in group versus individual treatment: An archival replication. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/gdn0000121.
   Google Scholar
• Alldredge, C., Burlingame, G., Yang, C., & Rosendahl, J. (in press). Alliance in group therapy: A meta-analysis. Paper under review by Group Dynamics
   Google Scholar
• Bakali, J. V., Baldwin, S. A., & Lorentzen, S. (2009). Modeling group process constructs at three stages in group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300902894430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beecher, M. E. (2008). A clinician’s take on evidence-based group psychotherapy: A commentary. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(11), 1279–1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, R., Worthen, V., Griner, D., Beecher, M., Burlingame, G. & Gleave, R. (2017). Outcome and assessment research. In J. Gross, M. Turner & M. Ribeiro (Eds.), The college counselor’s guide to group psychotherapy (pp. 95–106). Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16(3), 252–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0085885
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, B., Burlingame, G. M., & Strauß, B. (2011). Der Gruppenfragebogen (GQ-D). Psychotherapeut, 56(4), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00278-011-0841-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, B., & Strauss, B. (2007). Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy as components of the therapeutic relationship within group psychotherapy-test of a multilevel model. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 43(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G., Fuhriman, A., & Johnson, J. (2002). Cohesion in group psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), A guide to psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 71–88). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G., Gleave, R., Beecher, M., Griner, D., Hansen, K., Jensen, J., Worthen, V., & Svien, H. (2017). Administration and scoring manual for the group questionnaire. Salt Lake City, OQ Measures, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G., & Strauss, B. (in press). Efficacy of small group treatments. In M. Barkham, L. Castonguay, & W. Lut (Eds.), Bergin & Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (7th ed.). Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G., Strauss, B., Joyce, A., MacNair-Semands, R., MacKenzie, K., Ogrodniczuk, J., & Taylor, S. (2006). CORE battery: A revision and update. American Group Psychotherapy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G., Whitcomb, K., Woodland, S., Olsen, J., Beecher, M., & Gleave, R. (2018). The effects of relationship and progress feedback in group psychotherapy using the GQ and OQ-45: A randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy, 55(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G. M., McClendon, D. T., & Yang, C. (2018). Cohesion in group therapy: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., Burlingame, G., Rees, F., Gleave, R., Beecher, M., & Porter, G. (2012). Clinical prediction in group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 22(6), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.702512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. L., Baker, E. L., Porter, G., Thayer, S. D., & Burlingame, G. M. (2010). Rating group therapist interventions: The validation of the Group Psychotherapy Intervention Rating Scale. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016628
   Google Scholar
• Davidsen, A. H., Poulsen, S., Lindschou, J., Winkel, P., Tróndarson, M. F., Waaddegaard, M., & Lau, M. (2017). Feedback in group psychotherapy for eating disorders: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,85(5), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000173
   Google Scholar
• de Roten, Y., Fischer, M., Drapeau, M., Beretta, V., Kramer, U., Favre, N., & Desplaud, J. (2004). Is one assessment enough? Patterns of helping alliance development and outcome. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 11(5), 324-331. doi:10.1002/cpp.420
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, C. F., Muran, J. C., & Safran, J. D. (2018). Alliance rupture repair: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000185.supp
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eubanks-Carter, C., Muran, J. C., & Safran, J. D. (2010). Alliance ruptures and resolution. In J. C. Muran & J. P. Barber (Eds.), The therapeutic alliance: An evidence-based approach to practice and training (pp. 74–94). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C. D., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 316–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. E., Tasca, G. A., Ritchie, K., Balfour, L., & Bissada, H. (2014). Attachment anxiety moderates the relationship between growth in group cohesion and treatment outcomes in group psychodynamic interpersonal psychotherapy for women with binge eating disorder. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(1), 38–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleave, R., Burlingame, G., Beecher, M., Griner, D., Hansen, K. & Jenkins, S. (2017). Feedback-informed group treatment: Application of the OQ-45 and Group Questionnaire (GQ). In D. Prescott, C. Maeschalck, & S. Miller (Eds.), Reaching for excellence: Feedback-informed treatment in practice (pp. 141–166). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000039–008
   Google Scholar
• Griner, D., Beecher, M.E., Brown, L. B., Millet, A. J., Worthen, V., Boardman, R. D., Hansen, K., Cox, J., & Gleave, R. L. (2018). Practice-based evidence can help! Using the Group Questionnaire to enhance clinical practice. Psychotherapy, 55(2), 196–202. doi:10.1037/pst0000136.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, E. F. (1957). An empirical study of the concepts of cohesiveness and compatibility [ Unpublished honor’s thesis], Harvard University, Department of Social Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Shimokawa, K., & Sutton, S. W. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Olsen, S., Barlow, F. K., & Oei, T. P. S. (2012). Testing a single-item visual analogue scale as a proxy for cohesiveness in group psychotherapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C. D., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illing, V., Tasca, G. A., Balfour, L., & Bissada, H. (2011). Attachment dimensions and group climate growth in a sample of women seeking treatment for eating disorders. Psychiatry, 74(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2011.74.3.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, R., Burlingame, G., & Olsen, J. (2018). Developing a therapeutic relationship monitoring system for group treatment. Psychotherapy, 55(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. & Burlingame, G. (2018). An item reduction analysis of the Group Questionnaire. Psychotherapy, 55(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (2004). Group climate, cohesion, alliance and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. E., Burlingame, G. M., Olsen, J., Davies, D. R., & Gleave, R. L. (2005). Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivlighan, D., Lo Coco, G., Oieni, V., Gullo, S., Pazzagli, C., & Mazzeschi, C. (2017). All bonds are not the same: A response surface analysis of perceptions of positive bonding in therapy groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 21(3), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogel, J. (2008). The Group Questionnaire: A new measure of the group relationship [ Unpublished dissertation]. Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Krogel, J., Burlingame, G., Chapman, C., Renshaw, T., Gleave, R., Beecher, M., & MacNair-Semands, R. (2013). The Group Questionnaire: A clinical and empirically derived measure of group relationship. Psychotherapy Research, 23(3), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.729868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lese, K. P., & MacNair-Semands, R. R. (2000). The therapeutic factors inventory: Development of a scale. Group, 24(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026616626780
   Google Scholar
• Lo Coco, G., Gullo, S., Di Fratello, C., Giordano, C., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2016). Group relationships in early and late sessions and improvement in interpersonal problems. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Coco, G., Gullo, S., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2012). Examining patients’ and other group members’ agreement about their alliance to the group as a whole and changes in patient symptoms using response surface analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(2), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Coco, G., Gullo, S., Oieni, V., Giannone, F., Di Blasi, M., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2016). The relationship between attachment dimensions and perceptions of group relationships over time. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20(4), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Coco, G., Tasca, G. A., Hewitt, P. L., Mikail, S. F., & Kivlighan, J. D. M. (2019). Ruptures and repairs of group therapy alliance. An untold story in psychotherapy research. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 22(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.352
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, K. R. (1983). The clinical application of a group climate measure. In R. R. Dies & K. R. MacKenzie (Eds.), Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice (pp. 159–170). International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, K. R., Burlingame, G. M., & Fuhriman, A. (1999, February). Psychotherapy group and group program evaluation: Clinical use of brief process and outcome measures [Paper presented]. Annual convention of the American group psychotherapy association, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S., Duncan, B., Brown, J., Sparks, J. & Claud, D. (2003). The Outcome Rating Scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2(2), 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Norcross, J. (2002). A guide to psychotherapy relationships that work. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norcross, J., & Lambert, M. (2019). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Volume I evidence-based therapist contributions. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norcross, J. C., & Lambert, M. J. (2018). Psychotherapy relationships that work III. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 303–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pst0000193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, P. J., & Kazantzis, N. (2016). Dynamic relationships of therapist alliance and group cohesion in transdiagnostic group CBT for anxiety disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(2), 146–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeid, N., Carlucci, S., Brugnera, A., Compare, A., Proulx, G., Bissada, H., & Tasca, G. A. (2018). Reciprocal influence of distress and group therapeutic factors in day treatment for eating disorders: A progress and process monitoring study. Psychotherapy, 55(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, G. L., Kemani, M., Jensen, K., Kosek, E., Kadetoff, D., Sorjonen, K., … Wicksell, R. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy for fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 3(3), 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2012.05.027
   Google Scholar
• Piper, W. E., Marrache, M., Lacroix, R., Richardsen, A. M., & Jones, B. D. (1983). Cohesion as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, K., Miller, S., Duncan, B., & Owen, J. (2013). Group Session Rating Scale: Preliminary psychometrics in a substance abuse group intervention. Consulting and Psychotherapy Research, 13, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.744425
   Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Eubanks-Carter, C. (2011). Repairing alliance ruptures. In J. C. Norcross, Ed. Psychotherapy relationships that work. 2nd (pp. 224–238). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737208.003.0011
   Google Scholar
• Silbergeld, S., Koenig, G. R., Manderscheid, R. W., Meeker, B. F., & Hornung, C. A. (1975). Assessment of environment-therapy systems: The group atmosphere scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slone, N. C., Reese, R. J., Mathews-Duvall, S., & Kodet, J. (2015). Evaluating the efficacy of client feedback in group psychotherapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(2),122–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000026.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, C. L., Muran, J. C., Safran, J. D., Gorman, B. S., & Winston, A. (2007). Levels and patterns of the therapeutic alliance in brief psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2007.61.2.109
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B., Glick, M. J., Osatuke, K., Hardy, G. E., Shapiro, D. A., Agnew-Davies, R., Rees, A., & Barkham, M. (2004). Patterns of alliance development and the rupture-repair hypothesis: Are productive relationships U-shaped or V-shaped? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–0167.51.1.81
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, B., Burlingame, G., & Bormann, B. (2008). Using the CORE-R battery in group psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 64(11), 1225–1237. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca, G. A., Ritchie, K., Demidenko, N., Balfour, L., Krysanski, V., Weekes, K., Barber, A., Keating, L., & Bissada, H. (2013). Matching women with binge eating disorder to group treatment based on attachment anxiety: Outcomes and moderating effects. Psychotherapy Research: Journal Of The Society For Psychotherapy Research, 23(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.717309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, S. (2012). The validity of the Group Questionnaire: Construct clarity or construct drift? [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, S., & Burlingame, G. (2014). The validity of the group questionnaire: Construct clarity or construct drift? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 18(4), 318–332. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B. (2015). Routine outcome monitoring: coming of age–With the usual developmental challenges. Psychotherapy, 52(4), 458–462. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pst0000037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitcomb, K., Woodland, S., & Burlingame, G. (2018). Do clinicians really use feedback monitoring systems? A qualitative analysis of 16 group leaders. Psychotherapy, 55(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalom, I., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). Basic Book.
   Google Scholar