Where does the calculus go? An investigation of how calculus ideas are used in later coursework

References

• Kwon O, Allen K, Rasmussen C. Students’ retention of mathematical knowledge and skills in differential equations. Sch Sci Math. 2005;105:227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen C, Kwon ON. An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. J Math Behav. 2007;26:189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Czocher JA, Baker G. Contextual learning in math education for engineers. In: Aung W, Ilic V, Moscinski J, Uhomoibhi J, editors. Innovations 2011: world innovations in engineering education and research. MD: iNEER.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen C, King KD. Locating starting points in differential equations: a realistic mathematics education approach. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2000;31:161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen C, Kwon ON, Allen K, Marrongelle K, Burtch M. Capitalizing on advances in mathematics and K-12 mathematics education in undergraduate mathematics: an inquiry-oriented approach to differential equations. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2006;7:85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habre S. Exploring students’ strategies to solve ordinary differential equations in a reformed setting. J Math Behav. 2000;18:455–472.
   Google Scholar
• Ju M, Kwon ON. Ways of talking and ways of positioning: students’ beliefs in an inquiry-oriented differential equations class. J Math Behav. 2007;26:267–280.
   Google Scholar
• Raychaudhuri D. Dynamics of a definition: a framework to analyse student construction of the concept of solution to a differential equation. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2008;39:161–177.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland DR, Jovanoski Z. Student interpretations of the terms in first-order ordinary differential equations in modelling contexts. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2004;35:503–516.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland DR. Student difficulties with units in differential equations in modelling contexts. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2006;37:553–558.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen C. New directions in differential equations: a framework for interpreting students’ understandings and difficulties. J Math Behav. 2001;20:55–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sofronas KS, DeFranco TC, Vinsonhaler C, Gorgievski N, Schroeder L, Hamelin C. What does it mean for a student to understand the first-year calculus? Perspectives of 24 experts. J Math Behav. 2011;30:131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gray S, Loud B, Sokolowski C. Calculus students’ use and interpretation of variables: algebraic vs. arithmetic thinking. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2009;9:59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D, Vinner S. Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educ Stud Math. 1981;12:151–169.
   Google Scholar
• Zandieh MJ. The evolution of student understanding of the concept of derivative [dissertation]. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky E, McDonald M., Vol. 7 in APOS: a constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; 2001. p. 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Gray EM, Tall DO. Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: a ‘proceptual’ view of simple arithmetic. J Res Math Educ. 1994;25:115–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard A. On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educ Stud Math. 1991;22:1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Vinner S, Dreyfus T. Images and definitions for the concept of function. J Res Math Educ. 1989;20:356–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajander A, Lovric M. Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions. Int. J. Math Educ Sci Technol. 2009;40:173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Raman M. Coordinating informal and formal aspects of mathematics: student behavior and textbook messages. J Math Behav. 2002;21:135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Raman M. Epistemological messages conveyed by three high-school and college mathematics textbooks. J Math Behav. 2004;23:389–404.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson PW. Didactic objects and didactic models in radical constructivism. In: Gravemeijer K, Lehrer R, van Oers B, Verschaffel L, editors. Symbolizing, modeling, and tool use in mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer; 2002. p. 191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson PW. Conceptual analysis of mathematical ideas: some spadework at the foundation of mathematics education. In: Figueras O, Cortina JL, Alatorre S, Rojano T, Sépulveda A, editors. Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, Morélia, Mexico: PME; 2008. p. 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenthal H. Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Czocher JA. Explaining student performance through instruction. In 33rd Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Reno, NV; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce WE, DiPrima RC. Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems. Vol. 8. New York: Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Baker G. An introduction to differential equations for scientists and engineers. Forthcoming 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lithner J. Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. J Math Behav. 2004;23:405–427.
   Google Scholar
• Sierpinska A. Understanding in mathematics. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar