It's not maths; it's science: exploring thinking dispositions, learning thresholds and mindfulness in science learning

References

• Biggs J. Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations; 2003 April 13–17; Aveiro: University of Aveiro; 2003. Available from: http://e-bit.lk/wiki/images/2/2c/CA1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Redish EF. Introducing students to the culture of physics: explicating elements of the hidden curriculum. In: Sabella M, Singh C, Rebellow NS, editors. Physics Education Research Conference; Portland (OR): American Institute of Physics; 2010. p. 49–52. Available from: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1008.0578v1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman LS. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus. 2005;134(3):52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Land R. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge- linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In: Rust C, editor. Improving student learning: theory and practice ten years on. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University; 2003. p. 412–424.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JHF, Land R. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. High Educ. 2005;49(3):373–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins DN, Jay E, Tishman S. Beyond abilities: a dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill Palmer Quart. 1993;39:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson P. Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers’ College Press; 1990. p. 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ozolins I, Hall H, Peterson R. The student voice: recognising the hidden and informal curriculum in medicine. Med Teach. 2008;30(6):606–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke H. Medical education and sociology of medical habitus; “it's not about the stethoscope!” Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• LeBard R, Quinnell R. Using assessment audits to understand students’ learning obstacles. In: Hugman A, Placing K, editors. Visualisation and concept development. Sydney: The University of Sydney; 2008. p. 182–187. Available from: http://science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/2008/182.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Quinnell R, Thompson R. Conceptual intersections: re-viewing academic numeracy in the tertiary education sector as a threshold concept. In: Meyer Jan HF, Land Ray, Baillie Caroline, editors.Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2008. p. 147–164
   Google Scholar
• LeBard R, Thompson R, Micolich A, Quinnell R. Identifying common thresholds in learning for students working in the ‘hard’ discipline of Science. In: Hugman A, editor. 2009 UniServe Proceedings; October 1–2; Sydney: The University of Sydney; 2009. p. 72–77. Available from: http://sydney.edu.au/science/uniserve_science/images/content/2009_papers/LeBard.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Quinnell R, Wong E. Using intervention strategies to engage tertiary biology students in their development of numeric skills. In: Hugman A, Johnston I, Peat M, editors. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education; September 28–29; Sydney: The University of Sydney; 2007. p. 70–74. Available from: http://science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/2007/16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barrington F. Participation in Year 12 mathematics across Australia 1995–2004. Melbourne: ICE-EM Publications; 2006. Available from: http://www.amsi.org.au/images/stories/downloads/pdfs/education/Participation_in_Yr12_Maths.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G. Review of mathematics, data science and quantitative disciplines. Turner, ACT: The Group of Eight; 2009. Available from: http://www.go8.edu.au/__documents/go8-policy-analysis/2010/go8mathsreview.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler PM, Tai RH. Transitions. The two high-school pillars supporting college science. Science. 2007;317(5837):457–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinnell R, Thompson R. Conceptual Intersections: re-viewing academic numeracy in the tertiary education sector as a threshold concept. In: Meyer JHF, Land R, Baillie C, editors. Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2010. p. 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson FS, Suinn RN. The mathematics anxiety rating scale: psychometric data. J Couns Psychol. 1972;19:551–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hembee R. The nature, effect and relief of mathematics anxiety. J Res Math Educ. 1990;21:33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons IM, Beilock SL. When math hurts: math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PloS one. 2012;7(10):e48076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft MH. Math anxiety: personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2002;11(5):181–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd WE, Cullen M, Bass D, Pittman J, Regan J. A response to apparently low levels of numeracy and literacy amongst first year university environmental science students: a numeracy and literacy skills survey. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ. 1998;7(2):106–121.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger CM. Study skills and the math-anxious: reflecting on effective academic support in challenging times. In: Dellar-Evans K, Zeegers P, editors. Language and academic skills in higher education. Adelaide: Flinders University Press; 2003. p. 161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Meece JL, Wigfield A, Eccles JS. Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. J Educ Psychol. 1990;82(1):60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustoe L. The mathematics background of undergraduate engineers. Int J Elec Eng Educ. 2002;39(3):192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins DN, Salomon G. Transfer of learning. International encyclopedia of education. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): Pergamon Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Quinnell R, Thompson R, LeBard R. Academic numeracy in life sciences learning: challenging perceptions. Inaugural STEM Annual Conference; April 12–13; Imperial College. London: The UK Higher Education Academy; 2012. Available from: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/stem-conference/BioSciences2/Rosanne_Quinnell.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq VN, Durrani N. Factors influencing undergraduates’ self-evaluation of numerical competence. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2012;43:337–356.
   Google Scholar
• Langer EJ. Mindful learning. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2000;9(6):220–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeganeh B, Kolb D. Mindfulness and experiential learning. The OD Practitioner. 2009;41(3):14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins DN. Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In: Meyer JHF, Land R, editors. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Langer EJ. Matters of mind - mindfulness mindlessness in perspective. Conscious Cogn. 1992;1(4):289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tishman S, Andrade A. Thinking dispositions: a review of current theories, practices, and issues. Washington (DC): The Association of Community Colleges Trustees; 1995. Available from: https://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/thinking/docs/Dispositions.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins DN, Simmons R. The cognitive roots of scientific and mathematical ability and discussant reaction: alternative representations: a key to academic talent? In: Dreyden J, editor. Developing Talent in Mathematics, Science and Technology: A Conference on Academic Talent; 1988 March 28–30; Durham, North Carolina; 1988. p. 51–79.
   Google Scholar