Exploring the limits of trigonometric functions: results and reflections from a pilot study

References

• Cornu B. Limits. In: Tall D, editor. Advanced mathematical thinking. The Netherlands: Kluwer; 1991. p. 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Davis R, Vinner S. The notion of limit: some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. J Math Behav. 1986;5(3):281–303.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan J. Problems with the language of limits. For Lear Math. 1991;11(3):20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Barbé J, Bosch M, Espinoza L, Gascón J. Didactic restrictions on the teacher's practice: the case of limits of functions in Spanish high schools. Educ Stud Math. 2005;59:235–268.
   Google Scholar
• Bezuidenhout J. Limits and continuity: some conceptions of first-year students. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2001;32(4):487–500.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin N. The performance of undergraduate students in the limit concept. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2009;40(3):323–330.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D, Vinner S. Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educ Stud Math. 1981;12(2):151–169.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D, editor. Advanced mathematical thinking. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky E. Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In: Tall D, editor. Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. p. 95–126.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrill J, Dubinsky E, Nichols D, Schwingendorf K, Thomas K, Vidakovic D. Understanding the limit concept: beginning with a coordinated process scheme. J Math Behav. 1996;15:167–192.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky E, McDonald MA. APOS: a constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In: Holton D, editor. The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: an ICMI study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky E. The APOS theory of learning mathematics: pedagogical applications and results. Proceedings of the eighteenth annual meeting of the Southern African association for research in mathematics, science, science and technology education; 2010 January 18–21; Durban, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy N. Students’ perceptions of institutional practices: the case of limits of functions in college level calculus courses. Educ Stud Math. 2009;72(3):341–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy N. Students’ models of the knowledge to be learned about limits in college level calculus courses: the influence of routine tasks and the role played by institutional norms [doctoral thesis]. Quebec: Concordia University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget J. Development and learning. J Res Sci Teach. 1964;2:176–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget J. Piaget's theory. In: Mussen P, editor. Handbook of child psychology, 4th ed, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Wiley; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard A. On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educ Stud Math. 1991;22:1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Moru EK. Epistemological obstacles in coming to understand the limit of a function at undergraduate level: a case from the national university of Lesotho. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2009;7:431–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard A, Linchevsky L. The gains and the pitfalls of reification: the case of Algebra. Educ Stud Math. 1994;26(2–3):191–228.
   Google Scholar
• Asiala M, Brown A, De Vries DJ, Dubinsky E, Mathews D, Thomas K. A framework for research and development in undergraduate mathematics education. Res Collegiate Math Educ. 1996;2:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Maharaj A. An APOS analysis of students’ understanding of the concept of a limit of a function. Pythagoras. 2010;71:41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Moore T. What calculus do students learn after calculus? [ doctoral thesis]. Manhattan (KS): Kansas State University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ubuz B. Factors associated with success in a calculus course: an examination of personal variables. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2011;42(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mallet DG, McCue SW. Constructive development of the solutions of linear equations in introducing ordinary differential equations. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2009;40(5):587–595.
   Google Scholar
• Heid MK. Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. J Res Math Educ. 1988;19(1):3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Commission on standards for school mathematics: curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston (VA): The Council; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley LA. Evaluating student understanding in a calculus course enhanced by a computer algebra system. PRIMUS. 1997;7(4):308–316.
   Google Scholar
• Garner B, Garner L. Retention of concepts and skills in traditional and reformed applied calculus. Math Educ Res J. 2001;13(3):165–184.
   Google Scholar
• Milovanovic M, Takaci D, Milajic A. Multimedia approach in teaching mathematics: example of lesson about the definite integral application for determining an area. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2011;42(2):175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Stonewater JK. The mathematics writer's checklist: the development of a preliminary assessment tool for writing in mathematics. School Sci Math. 2002;102(7):324–334.
   Google Scholar