Designing Geometry 2.0 learning environments: a preliminary study with primary school students

References

• Kist W. The socially networked classroom - teaching in the New Media Age. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Noss R, Hoyles C, Mavrikis M, Geraniou E, Gutiérrez-Santos S, Pearce D. Broadening the sense of ‘dynamic’: a microworld to support students’ mathematical generalisation. ZDM Math Educ. 2009;41:493–503.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyles C, Noss R, Kent P. On the integration of digital technologies into mathematics classrooms. Int J Comput Math Learn. 2004;9(3):309–326.
   Google Scholar
• Kersaint G. Toward technology integration in mathematics education: a technology integration course planning assignment. Contemp Issues Technol Teach Educ. 2007;7(4):256–278.
   Google Scholar
• Eickelmann B, Drossel K, Wendt H, Bos W. ICT-Use in primary schools and children's mathematical achievement - a multilevel approach to compare educational systems through an international lens with TIMSS data. Paper presented at: Joint AARE APERA International Conference, WERA Focal Meeting; 2012; Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyles C, Lagrange JB. Mathematics education and technology – rethinking the terrain (The 17th ICMI Study). New York: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif R, Dawes L. Encouraging exploratory talk around computers. In: Monteith M, editor. IT for learning enhancement. Exeter: Intellect Press; 1998. p. 10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Williams JB, Jacobs J. Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian J Educ Technol. 2004;20(2):232–247.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde C. Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with Cabri-geometry. Int J Comput Math Learn. 2001;6:283–317.
   Google Scholar
• Little C. Interactive geometry in the classroom: old barriers and new opportunities. Proc Br Soc Res Learn Math, Univ Southampton. 2008;28(2):49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven K, Hennessy S, Deaney R. Constructions of dynamic geometry: a study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Comput Educ. 2008;51:297–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laborde C, Laborde JM. Interactivity in dynamic mathematics environments: what does that mean?, de ATCM 2011 Electronic Proceedings, Mathematics and Technoloy LLC. Available from: http://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP2011/pages/invited.html; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven K. Constituting digital tools and materials as classroom resources: the example of dynamic geometry. In: Gueudet G, Pepin B, Trouche L, editors. Mathematics curriculum material and teacher development. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter M, Jones K. Ways of linking geometry and algebra: the case of Geogebra. Proc Br Soc Res Learn Math. 2007;27(3):126–131.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter M, Lavicza Z. Mathematics teacher development with ICT: towards an International GeoGebra Institute. Proc Br Soc Res Learn Math. 2007;26(3):49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Haciomeroglu E, Bu L, Haciomeroglu G. Integrating technology into mathematics teacher education courses. Paper presented at: GeoGebra Conference; 2010; Ithaca, NY. Available from: https://geogebraithaca.wikispaces.com/geogebra-na2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter M, Preiner J. Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra. J Online Math Its Appl. 2007;7. Article ID 1448.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter M, Fuchs K. Combination of dynamic geometry, Algebra and Calculus in the software system GeoGebra. Paper presented at: Computer Algebra Systems and Dynamic Geometry Systems in Mathematics Teaching Conference; 2004; Pecs, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• GeoGebra publications. [Online] [cited 2012 Nov]. Available from: http://wiki.geogebra. org/en/Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysanthou I. The use of ICT in primary mathematics in Cyprus: the case of GeoGebra [ Master's thesis]. UK: University of Cambridge; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Battista MT. Learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Teach Child Math. 2002;8(6): 333–339.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno RM, Mayer R. Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cogn Instruction. 1997;17(3):215–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval R. A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educ Stud Math. 2006;61(1):103–131.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget J, Inhelder B. The child's conception of space. New York: W.W. Norton; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Serow P. Triangle property relationships: making the connections. Proceedings 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Burger WF, Shaughnessy JM. Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. J Res Math Educ. 1986;7(1):31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vighi P. The triangle as a mathematical object. Proceedings of the European Research in Mathematics Education III Congress; Feb 28–Mar 3; Bellaria, Italy; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Rolet C. Teaching and learning plane geometry in primary school: acquisition of a first geometrical thinking. Proceedings of the European Research in Mathematics Education III Congress; Feb 28–Mar 3; Bellaria, Italy; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein E. The theory of figural concepts. Educ Stud Math. 1993;24(2):139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Blogger. [En línea] [cited 2012 Oct]. Available from: http://www.Blogger.com.
   Google Scholar
• Trouche L. Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. Int J Comput Math Learn. 2004;9:281–307.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue M. Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. Int J Comput Math Learn. 2002;7(3):245–274.
   Google Scholar
• Wang F, Hannafin MJ. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educ Technol Res Develop. 2005;53(4):5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins A, Joseph D, Bielaczyc K. Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. J Learn Sci. 2004;13(1):15–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti MA. Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective: the role of the teacher. ZDM Math Educ. 2009;41:427–440.
   Google Scholar
• Preiner J. Introducing dynamic mathematics software to mathematics teachers: the case of GeoGebra [Doctoral dissertation in Mathematics Education]. Austria: Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Salzburg; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sada M. Applet de GeoGebra, [En línea] [cited 2012 Oct 1]. Available from: http://docentes.educacion.navarra.es/~msadaall/geogebra/figuras/tri5recta_euler.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson M, Tuson J. Using observations in small-scale research: a beginner's guide. Rev. ed. Glasgow: Scottish Council for Research in Education; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 6th ed. London: Routledge; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lavicza Z, Papp-Varga Z. Integrating ‘GeoGebra’ into IWB-equipped teaching environments: preliminary results. Technol, Pedagogy Educ. 2010;19(2):245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle J. Learning by collaboration: convergent conceptual change. J Learn Sci. 1992;2(3):235–276.
   Google Scholar
• Hershkowitz R. Visualization in geometry – two sides of the coin. Focus Learn Probl Math. 1989;11(1):61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kajander A, Lovric M. Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2009;40(2):173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez A, Jaime A. Preservice primary teachers’ understanding of the concept of altitude of a triangle. J Math Teac Educ. 1999;2:253–275.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Armella L, Hegedus S, Kaput JJ. From static to dynamic mathematics: historical and representational perspectives. Educ Stud Math. 2008;68:99–111.
   Google Scholar