Experience of integrating various technological tools into the study and future teaching of mathematics education students

References

• Cheung ACK, Slavin RE. The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievements in K-12 classrooms: a meta-analysis. Educ Res Rev. 2013;9:88–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldknow A, Knights C, editors. Mathematics education with digital technology. London: Continuum; 2011. Introduction; p. xxii–xxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Olive J, Makar K, Hoyos V, Kor LK, Kosheleva O, Sträßer R. Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. In: Hoyles C, Lagrange J-B, editors. Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: rethinking the terrain. Vol. 13, Mathematics education and technology – rethinking the terrain: new ICMI study series. Lisbon: Springer Science and Business Media; 2010. p. 133–177.
   Google Scholar
• Mously J, Lambdin D, Koc Y. Mathematics teacher education and technology. In: Bishop AJ, Clements MA, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Leung FKS, editors. Second international handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. p. 395–432.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless K, Pellegrino JW. Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:575–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handal B, Campbell C, Cavanagh M, Petocz P, Kelly N. Integrating technology, pedagogy and content in mathematics education. J Comput Math Sci Teach. 2012;31:387–413.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan J. Teachers’ classroom interactions in ICT-based mathematics lessons. In: Heuvel Mvd, editor. Proceedings of the 25th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education. Vol. 3. Utrecht: University of Nottingham; 2001. p. 239–257.
   Google Scholar
• Hollebrands KF. The role of a dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. J Res Math Educ. 2007;38:164–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban L, Kirkpatrick H, Peck C. High access and low use of technology in high school classrooms: explaining an apparent paradox. Am Educ Res J. 2001;38:813–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botana F, Abánades MA, Escribano J. Using a free open source software to teach mathematics. Comput Appl Eng Educ. [cited 2012 May]. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.21565/abstract
   Google Scholar
• Dye B. The uses of online resources for teaching and learning mathematics at advanced level. In: Oldknow A, Knights C, editors. Mathematics education with digital technology. London: Continuum; 2011. p. 148–156.
   Google Scholar
• Gadanidis G, Gadanidis J, Schindler K. Factors mediating the use of online applets in the lesson planning of preservice mathematics teachers. J Comput Math Sci Teach. 2003;22:323–344.
   Google Scholar
• Heath GD. Using applets in teaching mathematics. Math Comput Educ. 2002;36:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gadanidis G. Web-based multimedia activities as pedagogical models. In: Hoyles C, Lagrange J-B, editors. Asian technology conference in mathematics. Melbourne: RMIT University; 2001. p. 223–232.
   Google Scholar
• Drijvers P, Kieran C, Mariotti MA, Ainley J, Andresen M, Chan YC, Dana-Picard T, Gueudet G, Kidron I, Leung A, Meagher M. Integrating technology into mathematics education: theoretical perspectives. In: Hoyles C, Lagrange J-B, editors. Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: rethinking the terrain. Vol. 13, Mathematics education and technology – rethinking the terrain: new ICMI study series. Lisbon: Springer Science and Business Media; 2010. p. 89–132.
   Google Scholar
• Noss R, Hoyles C. Windows on mathematical meanings: learning cultures and computers. In: Bishop AJ, editor. Mathematics education library. Vol. 17. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1996. p. 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Drijvers P. Students encountering obstacles using a CAS. Int J Comput Math Learn. 2000;5:189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen C, Nemirovsky R. Becoming friends with acceleration: the role of tools and bodily activity in mathematical learning. In: Pateman NA, Zilliox BJ, editors. Proceedings of the 27th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Vol. 1. Honolulu: PME; 2003. p. 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Deaney R, Hennessy S. A case study of using multiple resources to teach straight line graphs. In: Oldknow A, Knights C, editors. Mathematics education with digital technology. London: Continuum; 2011. p. 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fuglestad AB, Healy L, Kynigos C, Monaghan J. Working with teachers: context and culture. In: Hoyles C, Lagrange J-B, editors. Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: rethinking the terrain. Vol. 13, Mathematics education and technology – rethinking the terrain: new ICMI study series. Lisbon: Springer Science and Business Media; 2010. p. 293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Goos M, Soury-Lavergne S, Assude T, Brown J, Kong CM, Glover D, Grugeon B, Laborde C, Lavicza Z, Miller D, Sinclair M. Teachers and teaching: theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In: Hoyles C, Lagrange J-B, editors. Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: rethinking the terrain. Vol. 13, Mathematics education and technology – rethinking the terrain: new ICMI study series. Lisbon: Springer Science and Business Media; 2010. p. 311–328.
   Google Scholar
• Gurevich I, Gorev D. Examining the impact of an integrative method of using technology on students’ achievement in geometry, efficiency of computer usage and pedagogic procedure. Int J Technol Math Educ. 2012;16:49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, N. Affordances of digital technologies. In: Calder N, editor. Processing mathematics through digital technologies: the primary years. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2011. p. 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lagrange JB, Argitue M, Laborde C, Trouche L. Technology and mathematics education: a multidimensional overview of recent research and innovation. In: Bishop AJ, Clements MA, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Leung FKS, editors. Second international handbook of mathematics education. Pt. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2003. p. 237–271.
   Google Scholar
• Pitard V. Emerging technologies for learning and teaching. In: Oldknow A, Knights C, editors. Mathematics education with digital technology. London: Continuum; 2011. p. 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Chen FH, Looi CK, Chen W. Integrating technology in the classroom: a visual conceptualization of teachers’ knowledge, goals and beliefs. J Comput Assist Learn. 2009;25:470–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J, Hofer M. Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In: Maddux CD, editor. Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009. Chesapeake (VA): Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE); 2009. p. 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kosma RB, editor. Technology, innovation, and educational change: a global perspective. Eugene (OR): International Society for Technology in Education; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Miodusar D, Nachmias R, Tubin D, Forkosh-Baruch A. Analysis schema for the study of domains and levels of pedagogical innovation in schools using ICT. Educ Inf Technol. 2003;8:23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hew KF, Brush T. Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2007;55:223–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So HJ, Kim B. Learning about problem based learning: student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian J Educ Technol. 2009;25:101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abboud-Blanchard M, Lagrange JB. Uses of ICT by pre-service mathematics teachers: towards a professional instrumentation? Int J Technol Math Educ. 2006;13:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Marton F, Runesson U, Tsui ABM. A space of learning. In: Marton F, Tsui ABM, editors. Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004. p. 3–42.
   Google Scholar
• Drijvers P, Doorman M, Boon P, Reed H, Gravemeijer K. The teacher and the tool: instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educ Stud Math. 2010;75:213–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler MJ, Mishra P. Introduction to TPCK. In: AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology, editor. The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York (NY): American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education; 2008. p. 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Rec. 2006;108:1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung I, Latchem C. A model for e-education: extended teaching spaces and extended learning spaces. Br J Educ Technol. 2011;42:6–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal AK, Chawla N. Pedagogy of mathematics: role of technology in teaching–learning mathematics. J Indian Res. 2013;1:105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer PA. Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2005;53:25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torner G, Rolka K, Rosken B, Sriraman B. Understanding a teacher's actions in the classroom by applying Schoenfeld's theory teaching-in-context: reflecting on goals and beliefs. In: Sriraman B, English L, editors. Theories of mathematics education: seeking new frontiers. Vol. 4, Advances in mathematics education. New York (NY): Springer; 2010. p. 401–420.
   Google Scholar
• Nuggent G, Soh L, Samal A. Design, development, and validation of learning objects. J Educ Technol Syst. 2006;34:271–281.
   Google Scholar
• Trouche L. Instrumental genesis, individual and social aspects. In: Guin D, Ruthven K, Trouche L, editors. The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators. New York (NY): Springer; 2005. p. 197–230.
   Google Scholar
• D'Souza S, Wood L. Secondary students’ resistance toward incorporating computer technology into mathematics learning. Math Comput Educ. 2004;37:284–293.
   Google Scholar
• Barabash M, Gurevich I, Yanovsky L. Usage of computerized environment in the undergraduate course “Plane Transformations and Constructions in Geometry”. Int J Technol Math Educ. 2009;16:49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gorev D, Gurevich I, Barabash M. Will “the way they teach” be “the way they have learned”? (pre-service teachers’ beliefs concerning computer embedding in math teaching). In: Hoines MJ, Fuglestad AB, editors. Proceedings of the PME – 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Bergen: University of Cyprus; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gurevich I, Gorev D, Barabash M. The computer as an aid in development of geometrical proficiency: a differential approach. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2005;2–3:289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Carr W, Kemmis S. Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantinou-Katzi P, Tsolaki E, Meletiou-Mavtotheris M, Koutselini M. Differences of teaching and learning mathematics: an action research study in tertiary education. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2013;44:332–349.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2005. p. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16:837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shkedi A. The meaning behind the words – methodologies of qualitative research: theory and practice. Tel Aviv: Ramot; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde C. Designing substantial tasks to utilize ICT in mathematics lessons. In: Oldknow A, Knights C, editors. Mathematics education with digital technology. London: Continuum; 2011. p. 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gurevich I. Students’ attitudes about integrating dynamic geometry software in teaching constructions in geometry. In: Morris L, Tsolakidis C, editors. International conference on information and communication technologies in education (ICICTE 2012). Proceedings; 2012 Jul 5–7; Rhodes, Greece: Achva Academic College of Education; 2012. p. 581–591.
   Google Scholar