Impact of computer animations in cognitive learning: differentiation

References

• Ashton PT. Editorial. J Teach Educ. 1992;43(5):322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegg J, Tall D. The fundamental cycle of concept construction underlying various theoretical frameworks. ZDM. 2005;37(6):468–475.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D. Using technology to support an embodied approach to learning concepts in mathematics. In: Carvalho LM, Guimarães LC, editors. Vol. 1, História e tecnologia no ensino da matemática. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil; 2003. p. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D. A theory of mathematical growth through embodiment, symbolism and proof. Paper presented at: International Colloquium on Mathematical Learning from Early Childhood to Adulthood. Centre de Recherche sur l’Enseignement des Mathématiques; 2005 5–7 July; Nivelles, (Belgium).
   Google Scholar
• Hahkioniemi M. Associative and reflective connections between the limit of the difference quotient and limiting process. J Math Behav. 2006;25:170–184.
   Google Scholar
• Schank RC. Learning via multimedia computers. Technol Educ. 1993;36((5)):54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Habre S. Visualization in multivariable calculus: the case of 3D-surfaces. Focus Learn Probl Math. 2001;23(1):30–48.
   Google Scholar
• Habre S, Abboud M. Students’ conceptual understanding of a function and its derivative in an experimental calculus course. J Math Behav. 2006;25:57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Heid K. Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. J Res Math Educ. 1988;19(1):3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serhan D. The effect of graphing calculators use on students’ understanding of the derivative at a point. Int J Math Teach Learn. 2006. Available from: http://www.cimt.plymouth. ac.uk/journal/serhan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Doorman M. Modelling motion: from trace graphs to instantaneous change. Utrecht (NL): CD-β Press; 2005. Available from: http://igiturarchive. library.uu.nl/dissertations/2005-0311-094207/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Schacter J, Fagnano C. Does computer technology improve student learning and achievement? How, when, and under what conditions? J Educ Comput Res. 1999;20(4):329–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg P. Mathematics, metaphors, and human factors: mathematical, technical, and pedagogical challenges in the educational use of graphical representation of functions. J Math Behav. 1988;7(2):135–173.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs KL. Investigation of interactive online visual tools for the learning of mathematics. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2005;36(7):761–768.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan C, Alshwaikh J. Learning about motion in a multi-semiotic environment. Res Math Educ. 2009;11(1):79–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhoum EG. Animating an equation: a guide to using flash in mathematics education. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2008;39(5):637–655.
   Google Scholar
• Borrelli RL, Coleman CS. Revolutions in differential equations, modelling and visualization in the introductory ode course. The Mathematics Association of America, Notes, 50, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lipeikiene J, Lipeika A. Animation tools of CAS for dynamic exploration of mathematics. Inform Educ. 2006;5(1):87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas GB. In: Weir MD, Hass J, Giordano FR, editors. Thomas’ Calculus. Pearson Education; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D. Functions and calculus. In: Bishop AJ, et al., editors. International handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1997. p. 289–325. Available from: http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/pdfs/dot1997a-functions-calculus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky R. Calculus across all educational levels. Proceedings of Working Group 3 on Students Difficulties in Calculus, ICME-7; 1993, Québec, Canada. p. 56–58.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput JJ. Technology and mathematics education. In: Grouws D, editor. Handbook on research in mathematics teaching and learning. New York (NY): Macmillan; 1992. p. 515–556.
   Google Scholar
• Douville P, Pugalee DK. Investigating the relationship between mental imaging and mathematical problem solving. Proceedings of the International Conference of Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project; 2003 September; Brno, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley LA. Evaluating the effects on conceptual understanding and achievement of enhancing an introductory calculus course with a computer algebra system (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1995). Diss Abstr Int. 1996;56(10):3869.
   Google Scholar
• Brown R. The Texas TI-92: your own mathematics computer. In: Forgaz H, Jones T, Leder G, Lynch J, Maguire K, Pearn C, editors. Mathematics: making connections. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria. Melbourne: MAV; 1996. p. 469–473.
   Google Scholar
• Barak M, Dory YJ. Science education in primary schools: is an animation worth a thousand pictures? J Sci Educ Technol. 2011;20(5):608–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller BA, Russell CA. Effects of the TI-92 on calculus students solving symbolic problems. Int J Comput Algebra Math Educ. 1997;4(1):77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Repo S. Understanding and reflective abstraction: Learning the concept of derivative in a computer environment. Int DERIVE J. 1996;1(1):97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Barak M, Ashkar T, Dori YJ. Learning science via animated movies: its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Comput Educ. 2011;56:839–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang EM, Andre T, Greenbowe TJ. Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. Int J Sci Educ. 2003;25:329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak M, Dory YJ. Enhancing undergraduate students’ chemistry understanding through project based learning in an IT environment. Sci Educ. 2005;89(1):117–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar