The effect of project-based learning on students’ statistical literacy levels for data representation

References

• Garfield J, Gal I. Assessment and statistics education: current challenges and directions. Int Stat Rev. 1999;67(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callingham R, Watson JM. Measuring statistical literacy. J Appl Meas. 2005;6(1):19–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gal I. Adult's statistical literacy: meaning, components, responsibilities In: Ben-Zvi D, Garfield J, editors. The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2004. p. 47–78.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield J, Ben-Zvi D. Developing students’ statistical reasoning: connecting research and teaching practice. Emeryville (CA): Key College Publishing; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Watson JM, Callingham R. Statistical literacy: a complex hierarchical construct. Stat Educ Res J. 2003;2:3–46
   Google Scholar
• Gal I. Adult statistical literacy: meanings, components, responsibilities. Int Stat Rev. 2002;70(1):1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallman KK. Enhancing statistical literacy: enriching our society. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88(421):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehohla P. Promoting statistical literacy: a South African perspective. In: Phillips B, editor. Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Cape Town: International Statistical Institute and International Association for statistics Education; 2002. Available from: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications
   Google Scholar
• Watson JM. Assessing statistical literacy using the media. In: Gal I, Garfield JB, editors. The assessment challenge in statistics education. Amsterdam: IOS Press & The International Statistical Institute; 1997. p. 107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) report:a curriculum framework for PreK–12 statistics education. Alexandria (VA): The American Statistical Association (ASA); 2005. Available from: www.amstat.org/education/gaise
   Google Scholar
• Hunter WG. Some ideas about teaching design of experiments, with 2^5 examples of experiments conducted by students. Am Stat. 1977;31:12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts HV. Student-conducted projects in introductory statistics courses. In: Florence G, Sheldon G, editors. Statistics for the twenty-first century ( MAA Notes No. 26). Washington (DC): Mathematical Association of America; 1992. p. 109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield J. How students learn statistics. Int Stat Rev. 1995;63(1):25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love TE. A project-drive second course. J Stat Educ. 1998;6(1). Available from: www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v6n1/love.html
   Google Scholar
• Cook CMA. Designing a first experiment: a project for design of experiment courses. Am Stat. 1998;52(4):338–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnell LJ. The effect of a student-designed data collection project on attitudes towards statistics. J Stat Educ. 2008;16(1). Available from: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v16n1/carnell.html
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris JH, Katz LG. Young investigators: the project approach in the early years. New York: Teachers College Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Moursund D. Project based learning using information technology. Eugene (OR): ISTE; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Jung H, Jun W, Gruenwald L. A design and implementation of web-based project-based learning support systems; 2001. Available from: www.cs.ou.edu/~database/documents/jjg01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roseth CJ, Garfield JB, Ben-Zvi D. Collaboration in learning and teaching statistics. J Stat Educ. 2008;16(1). Available from: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v16n1/roseth.html
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garfield J. An authentic assessment of students’ statistical knowledge. In: Webb N, editor. National council of teachers of mathematics 1993 yearbook: assessment in the mathematics classroom. Reston (VA): NCTM; 1993. p. 187–196.
   Google Scholar
• Friel SN, Curcio FR, Bright GW. Making sense of graphs: critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. J Res Math Educ. 2001;32:124–158.
   Google Scholar
• Berg CA, Phillips DG. An investigation of the relationship between logical thinking structures and the ability to construct and interpret line graphs. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31:323–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mevarech ZR, Kramarsky B. From verbal descriptions to graphic representations: stability and change in students’ alternative conceptions. Educ Stud Math. 1997;32:229–263.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney ES. Development of a middle school statistical thinking framework. Math Thinking Learn. 2002;4(1):23–63.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy JM. Missed opportunities in research on the teaching and learning of data and chance. In: Biddulp F, Carr K, editors. People in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia; Vol. 1; Waikato: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia; 1997. p. 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Friel SN, Bright GW. Building a theory of graphicacy: how do students read graphs? Paper presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 1996; New York (NY). ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395 277).
   Google Scholar
• Pereira-Mendoza L, Mellor J. Students’ concepts of bar graphs – some preliminary findings. In: Vere-Jones D, editor. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute; 1991. p. 150–157.
   Google Scholar
• Watson JM, Mortiz JB. The role of cognitive conflict in developing students’ understanding of chance measurement. In: Bobis J, Perry B, Mitchelmore M, editors. Numeracy and beyond. Sydney: MERGA; 2001. p. 523–530.
   Google Scholar
• Curcio FR. Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. J Res Math Educ. 1987;18:382–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham A. Statistical investigations in the secondary school. In: Greer B, Mulhern G, editors. New directions in mathematics education. London: Routledge; 1989. p. 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla MJ, McKenzie DL, Shaw EL Jr. An examination of the line graphing ability of students in grades seven through twelve. School Sci Math. 1986;86(1):20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs J, Collis K. Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Berberoğlu G. Seçme amacıyla kullanılan testlerde Rasch modelinin katkıları [doctoral dissertation]. Ankara: Hacettepe University; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK. Item response theory: brief history, common models and extensions. In: van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK. editors. Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Englehard G. Thorndike, Thurstone and Rasch: a comparison of their approaches to item-invariant measurement. Paper Presented at: The American Educational Research Association Conference; 1990; Boston (MA).
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Elhan AH, Atakurt Y. Ölçeklerin değerlendirilmesinde niçin Rasch analizi kullanılmalıdır? Ankara Üniv Tıp Fakül Mecmuası. 2005;58:47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Izard J, Haines C, Crouch R, Houston S, Neill N. Assessing the impact of the teaching of modelling: some implications. In: Lamon S, Parker W, Houston K, editors. Mathematical modelling: a way of life: ICTMA 11. Chichester: Horwood Publishing; 2003. p. 165–177.
   Google Scholar
• Misailidou C, Williams J. Diagnostic assessment of children's proportional reasoning. J Math Behav. 2003;22:335–368.
   Google Scholar
• Watson J, Kelly B, Izard J. Student change in understanding of statistical variation after instruction and after two years: an application of Rasch analysis. Refereed Paper Presented at: The AARE Conference; 2004; Melbourne. Available from: www.aare.edu.au ( search code WAT04867)
   Google Scholar
• Wright B. Model selection: rating scale or partial credit?. Rasch Meas Trans. 1999;12(3):641–642.
   Google Scholar
• Masters GN. The analysis of partial credit scoring. Appl Measurement Educ. 1988;1(4):279–297.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RJ. Applying the partial credit model to educational diagnosis. Appl Meas Educ. 1988;1(4):347–361.
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences 2nd ed. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. A user's guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch model computer programs. Chicago (IL): MESA Press; 2011. Available from: http://www.winsteps.com
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis. Chicago (IL): MESA Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47(2):149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson JM. Statistical literacy at school, growth and goal. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kaynar Y, Halat E. İlköğretim II. Kademe matematik öğretim programının olasılık ve istatistik alt öğrenme alanının istatistik boyutunun incelenmesi. Niğde: X. Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Uçar TZ, Akdoğan NE. Middle school students’ understanding of average. Elem Educ Online. 2009;8(2):391–400.
   Google Scholar
• Berg CA, Smith P. Assessing students' abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: disparities between multiple-choice and free-response instruments. Sci Educ. 1994;78:527–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa A, Hammer D, Sherin B, Kolpakowski T. Inventing graphing: meta-representational expertise in children. J Math Behav. 1991;10:117–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock C, Kaput JJ, Goldsmith LT. Authentic inquiry with data: critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educ Psychol. 1992;27:337–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson DF, Edwards BJ, Berger CF. Teaching the design and interpretation of graphs through computer-aided graphical data analysis. J Res Sci Teach. 1993;30:483–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer R, Romberg T. Exploring children's data modeling. Cogn Instruction. 1996;14:69–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt D. Young children's active and passive graphing. J Comput Assist Learn. 1995;11:157–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar