777
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A quantitative analysis of the relationship between an online homework system and student achievement in pre-calculus

&
Pages 687-699 | Received 14 Aug 2013, Published online: 27 Jan 2015

References

  • Fox WP, West RD. Beginning with a 21st century view: technology and modeling with interdisciplinary applications in college algebra. Int J Technol Math Educ. 2004;11(2):45–58.
  • Lewis J, Tucker A. AMS task force on the first-year mathematics experience. Notices Am Math Soc. 2009;56(6):754–760.
  • Sisson P. Pre-calculus. New York (NY): Hawkes Learning Systems; 2006.
  • NCTM. Position on: the role of technology in teaching and learning of mathematics. 2008. Available from: http://www.nctm.org/about/content.aspx?id=14233
  • Pierce R, Stacey K. Reflections on the changing pedagogical use of computer algebra systems: assistance for doing or learning mathematics? J Comput Math Sci Teaching. 2001;20(2):143–161.
  • Meletiou-Mavrotheris M, Lee C, Fouladi RT. Introductory statistics, college student attitudes and knowledge – a qualitative analysis of the impact of technology-based instruction. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2007;38(1):65–83.
  • Burch KJ, Kuo Y-J. Traditional vs. online homework in college algebra. Math Comput Educ. 2010;44(1):53–63.
  • Zerr R. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of online homework in first-semester calculus. J Comput Math Sci Teaching. 2007;26(1):55–73.
  • Campuzano L, Dynarski M, Agodini R, Rall K. Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: findings from two student cohorts. Washington (DC): National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute for Education Sciences U.S. Department of Education; 2009.
  • Rutz E, Eckhart R, Wade JE, Maltbie C, Rafter C, Elkins V. Student performance and acceptance of instructional technology: comparing technology-enhanced and traditional instruction for a course in statistics. J Eng Educ. 2003;92(2):133–140.
  • Twigg C. Innovations in online learning: moving beyond no significant difference. The Pew Learning and Technology Program. 2001. Available from: http://www.center.pi.edu/PewSym/Mono4.pdf
  • Wallace D, Mutooni P. A comparative evaluation of world wide Web-based and classroom teaching. J Eng Educ. 1997;86(3):211–219.
  • Charman D, Elmes A. Computer based assessment Vol 1,2: case studies in science and computing. Plymouth, UK: SEED Publications, University of Plymouth; 1998.
  • Mavrikis M, Maciocia A. Incorporating assessment into interactive learning environments for mathematics. Scotland: Maths-CAA Series; 2003.
  • Corbett AT, Anderson JR. Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact of learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In: Beaudouin-Lafon, Michel, Jacob, Robert JK, editors. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2001; Seattle. New York (NY): ACM Press. p. 245–252.
  • Ritter S, Kulikowich J, Lei P, McGuire CL, Morgan P. What evidence matters? A randomized field trial of cognitive tutor algebra I. In: Hirashima T, Hoppe U, Young SS, editors. Supporting learning flow through interactive technologies. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE); Amsterdam (NL): IOS Press; 2007. p. 13–20.
  • Ames C. Classrooms: goals, structures and student motivation. J Educ Psychol. 1992;84(3):261–271.
  • Middleton JA, Spanias PA. Motivation for achievement in mathematics: findings, generalization and criticism of the research. J Res Math Educ. 1999;30(1):65–88.
  • Walker DJ, Topping K, Rodriguez S. Student reflections on formative e-assessment: expectations and perceptions. Learn Media Technol. 2008;33(3):221–223
  • Leigh-Lancaster D. Curriculum and assessment congruence: computer algebra systems (CAS) in Victoria; 2000. Available from: http://www.math.ohiostate.edu/∼waitsb/papers/t3_posticme2000/leigh-lancaster.pdf
  • Stewart S, Thomas MOJ, Hannah J. Towards student instrumentation of computer-based algebra systems in university courses. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2005;36(7):741–749.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.