Explanation, motivation and question posing routines in university mathematics teachers' pedagogical discourse: a commognitive analysis

References

• Hillel J. Trends in curriculum: a working group report. In: Holton DA, editor. The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: an ICMI study. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2001. p. 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D. editor. Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi E, Biza I, González-Martín AS, Gueudet G, Winsløw C. Institutional, sociocultural and discursive approaches to research in university mathematics education (special issue). Res Math Educ. 2014;16(2):91–94.
   Google Scholar
• Speer N, Smith J, Horvath A. Collegiate mathematics teaching: an unexamined practice. J Math Behav. 2010;29:99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Artemeva N, Fox J. The writing's on the board: the global and the local in teaching undergraduate mathematics through chalk talk. Writ Commun. 2011;28:345–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukawa-Connelly TP. A case study of one instructor's lecture-based teaching of proof in abstract algebra: making sense of her pedagogical moves. Educ Stud Math. 2012;81:325–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viirman O. The function concept and university mathematics teaching [dissertation]. Karlstad: Karlstad University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Viirman O. Discursive practices of two mathematics teachers on the concept of ‘linear transformation’. In: Ubuz B, editor. Proceedings of the 35th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4). Ankara: PME; 2011. p. 313–320.
   Google Scholar
• Viirman O. The teaching of functions as a discursive practice: university mathematics teaching from a commognitive standpoint. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Seoul: ICMI; 2012. p. 1559–1568.
   Google Scholar
• Viirman O. The functions of function discourse: university mathematics teaching from a commognitive standpoint. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2013;45:512–527.
   Google Scholar
• Viirman O. What we talk about when we talk about functions: characteristics of the function concept in the discursive practices of three university teachers. In: Ubuz B, Haser C, Mariotti MA, editors. Proceedings of the eighth congress of the European mathematical society for research in mathematics education. Ankara: ERME; 2013. p. 2466–2475.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard A. Thinking and communicating: human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ryve A. Discourse research in mathematics education: a critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. J Res Math Educ. 2011;42:167–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton DA. editor. The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: an ICMI study. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Burton L. Mathematicians as enquirers: learning about learning mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi E. Amongst mathematicians: teaching and learning mathematics at university level. New York: Springer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wood L, Petosz P, Reid A. Becoming a mathematician: an international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Weber K. Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: a case study of one professor's lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course. J Math Behav. 2004;23:115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Wood LN, Joyce S, Petocz P, Rodd M. Learning in lectures: multiple representations. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2007;38:907–915.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten C. Investigating quality of undergraduate mathematics lectures. Math Educ Res J. 2007;19:48–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten C. A calculus lecture: what made it good? In: Gunnardóttir GH, Hreinsdóttir F, Pálsdóttir G, Hannula-Sormunen M, Jablonka E, Jankvist UT, Ryve A, Valero P, Wæge K, editors. Proceedings of NORMA 11: The Sixth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education. Reykjavík: University of Iceland; 2012. p. 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Hora MT, Ferrare JJ. Instructional systems of practice: a multidimensional analysis of math and science undergraduate course planning and classroom teaching. J Learn Sci. 2013;22:212–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas S. An activity theory analysis of linear algebra teaching within university mathematics [dissertation]. Loughborough: Loughborough University; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Güçler B. Examining the discourse on the limit concept in a beginning-level calculus classroom. Educ Stud Math. 2013;82:439–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi E, Jaworski B, Hegedus S. A spectrum of pedagogical awareness for undergraduate mathematics: from ‘tricks’ to ‘techniques’. J Res Math Educ. 2005;36:284–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. Sensitivity and challenge in university mathematics tutorial teaching. Educ Stud Math. 2002;51:71–94.
   Google Scholar
• Iannone P, Nardi E. On the pedagogical insight of mathematicians: ‘interaction’ and ‘transition from the concrete to the abstract’. J Math Behav. 2005;24:191–215.
   Google Scholar
• Barton B. Growing understanding of undergraduate mathematics: a good frame produces better tomatoes. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2011;42:963–973.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard D. Where learning starts? A framework for thinking about lectures in university mathematics. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2010;41:609–623.
   Google Scholar
• Rodd M. Witness as participation: the lecture theatre as site for mathematical awe and wonder. For Learn Math. 2003;23:15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mason JH. Mathematics teaching practice. A guide for university and college lecturers. Chichester: Horwood; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. Asking mathematical questions mathematically. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2000;31:97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Adams R. Calculus: a complete course. Boston (MA): Pearson Addison Wesley; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lay DC. Linear algebra and its applications. Boston (MA): Pearson Addison Wesley; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen C. Video analysis of mathematical practice? Different attempts to ‘open up’ mathematics for sociological investigation. Forum: Qual Soc Res. 2008;9:Article 32 [73 paragraphs]. Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1172
   Google Scholar