Implementation and outcomes of inquiry-based learning in mathematics content courses for pre-service teachers

References

• Ball DL, Hill HC, Bass, H. Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? Amer Educ. 2005;29:14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. The mathematical education of teachers II. Vol 17, Issues in mathematics education. Providence (RI): American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick J, Swafford J, Findell B, editors. Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Beilock SL, Gunderson EA, Ramirez G, et al. Female teachers' math anxiety affects girls' math achievement. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2010;107:1860–1863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel G. On teacher education programmes in mathematics. Int J Math Educ Sci Tech. 1994;25:113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond A. Inconsistencies between beginning elementary teachers' beliefs and practice. J Res Math Educ. 1997;28:550–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson V. The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In: Secula J, editor. Handbook res teacher ed. New York (NY): Simon & Schuster; 1996. p. 102–119.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson AG. Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: a synthesis of the research. In: Grouws D, editor. Handbook res math teaching learning. New York (NY): MacMillan; 1992. p. 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Philipp RA. Mathematics teachers' beliefs and affect. In: Lester F Jr., editor. Second handbook res math teaching learning. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing; 2007. p. 257–315.
   Google Scholar
• White AL, Way J, Perry B, et al. Mathematical attitudes, beliefs and achievement in primary pre-service mathematics teacher education. Math Teacher Educ Devel. 2005;7:33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Szydlik JE, Szydlik SD, Benson SR. Exploring changes in pre-service elementary teachers' mathematical beliefs. J Math Teacher Educ. 2003;6:253–279.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler JW, Hiebert J. The teaching gap: best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York (NY): Simon & Schuster; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hourigan M, O'Donoghue J. The challenges facing initial teacher education: Irish prospective elementary teachers' mathematics subject matter knowledge. Int J Math Educ Sci Tech. 2013;44:36–58.
   Google Scholar
• Prince M, Felder R. The many facets of inductive teaching and learning. J College Sci Teaching. 2007;36:14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshinobu S, Jones M. An overview of inquiry-based learning in mathematics. In: Cochran JJ, editor. Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. DOI: 10.1002/9780470400531.eorms1065
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin MPMM. Inquiry-based learning: an educational reform based upon content-centered teaching. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Association of America; 2009 5–8 January; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner JF, Speer NM, Rossa B. Beyond mathematical content knowledge: mathematician's knowledge needed for teaching an inquiry-oriented differential equations course. J Math Behav. 2007;26:247–266.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen S, Hassi M-L, Kogan M, et al. Evaluation of the IBL Mathematics Project: Student and Instructor Outcomes of Inquiry-Based Learning in College Mathematics. (Report to the Educational Advancement Foundation and the IBL Mathematics Centers). Boulder (CO): University of Colorado, Ethnography & Evaluation Research; 2011. Available from: http://www.colorado.edu/eer/research/steminquiry.html
   Google Scholar
• Laursen SL, Hassi M-L, Kogan M, et al. Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics. J Res Math Ed. 2014;45:406–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair R, Kirkman EE, Maxwell JW. Statistical abstract of undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences in the United States: fall 2010 CBMS survey. Providence (RI): American Mathematical Society; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• McCrory R, Cannata M. Mathematics classes for future elementary teachers: data from mathematics departments. Notices Amer Math Soc. 2011;58:29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt W, Burroughs N, Cogan L. World class standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. East Lansing (MI): Michigan State University Center for the Study of Curriculum & The Education Policy Center; 2013. Available from: http://education.msu.edu/csc/projects/pdf/World-Class-Standards-for-Preparing-Teachers-of-Mathematics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Walsh K. No common denominator: The preparation of elementary teachers in mathematics by America's education schools. Washington (DC): National Council on Teacher Quality; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kajander A. Elementary mathematics teacher preparation in an era of reform: the development and assessment of mathematics for teaching. Can J Educ. 2010;33:228–255.
   Google Scholar
• Masingila JO, Olanoff DE, Kwaka DK. Who teaches mathematics content courses for prospective elementary teachers in the United States? results of a national survey. J Math Teacher Educ. 2012;15:347–358.
   Google Scholar
• Newton J, Maeda Y, Alexander V, et al. How well are secondary mathematics teacher education programs aligned with the recommendations made in MET II? Notices Amer Math Soc. 2014;61:292–295.
   Google Scholar
• Hill HC, Ball D. Learning mathematics for teaching: results from California's mathematics professional development institutes. J Res Math Educ. 2004;35:330–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman LS. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res. 1986;15:4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ball DL, Thames MH, Phelps G. Content knowledge for teaching; what makes it special? J Teacher Educ. 2008;59:389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrou M, Goulding M. Conceptualising teachers' mathematical knowledge in teaching. In: Rowland T, Ruthven K, editors. Mathematical knowledge in teaching. Vol. 50, Mathematics Education Library. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. p. 9–25.
   Google Scholar
• Depaepe F, Verschaffel L, Kelchtermans G. Pedagogical content knowledge: a systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching Teacher Educ. 2013;34:12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döhrmann M, Kaiser G, Blömeke S. The conceptualisation of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. In: Blömeke S, Hsieh FJ, Kaiser G, Schmidt W, editors. International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 431–456.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland T, Ruthven K, editors. Mathematical knowledge in teaching. Vol. 50, Mathematics Education Library. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Hill HC, Schilling SG, Ball DL. Developing measures of teachers' mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elem School J. 2004;105:11–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill HC, Ball DL, Schilling SG. Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. J Res Math Educ. 2008;39:372–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling SG, Hill HC. Assessing measures of mathematical knowledge for teaching: a validity argument approach. Measurement. 2007;5:70–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hill HC, Rowan B, Ball DL. Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. Amer Educ Res J. 2005;42:371–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill HC, Umland K, Litke E, et al. Teacher quality and quality teaching: examining the relationship of a teacher assessment to practice. Amer J Educ. 2012;118:489–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney S, Ball DL, Hill HC, et al. “Mathematical knowledge for teaching”: adapting US measures for use in Ireland. J Math Teacher Educ. 2008;11:171–197.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Thames MH, Pang J. To change or not to change: adapting mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) measures for use in Korea. ZDM Math Educ. 2012;44:371–385.
   Google Scholar
• Fauskanger J, Jakobsen A, Mosvold R, et al. Analysis of psychometric properties as part of an iterative adaptation process of MKT items for use in other countries. ZDM Math Educ. 2012;44:387–399.
   Google Scholar
• Ng D, Mosvold R, Fauskanger J. Translating and adapting the Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching measures. Math Enthus. 2012;9(1&2):149–178.
   Google Scholar
• Potari D, Georgiadou–Kabouridis B. A primary teacher's mathematics teaching: the development of beliefs and practice in different “supportive” contexts. J Math Teacher Educ. 2009;12:7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner JS. The act of discovery. Harvard Educ Rev. 1961;31:21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden M, Major CH. Foundations of problem-based learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• McCann TM, Johannessen LR, Kahn E, Smagorinsky P, editors. Reflective teaching, reflective learning: how to develop critically engaged readers, writers, and speakers. Portsmouth (NH): Heinemann; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Moon JA. A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: theory and practice. New York (NY): RoutledgeFalmer; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ, Schunk DH. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Coppin CA, Mahavier WT, May EL, et al. The Moore method: a pathway to learner-centered instruction, MAA notes #75. Washington (DC): Mathematical Association of America; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Parker JRL. Moore: mathematician and teacher. Washington (DC): Mathematical Association of America; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen C, Kwon ON, Allen K, et al. Capitalizing on advances in mathematics and K-12 mathematics education in undergraduate mathematics: an inquiry-oriented approach to differential equations. Asia Pacific Educ Rev. 2006;7:85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian Smith J. A sense-making approach to proof: strategies of students in traditional and problem-based number theory courses. J Math Behav. 2006;25:73–90.
   Google Scholar
• McClain K. Supporting preservice teachers' understanding of place value and multidigit arithmetic. Math Thinking Learning. 2003;5:281–306.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Chaim D, Keret Y, Ilany BS. Designing and implementing authentic investigative proportional reasoning tasks: the impact on pre-service teachers' content and pedagogical knowledge and attitudes. J Math Teacher Educ. 2007;10, 333–340.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman O. Facilitating preservice teachers' development of mathematics knowledge for teaching arithmetic operations. J Math Teacher Educ. 2007;10:341–349.
   Google Scholar
• Lo JJ, Grant TJ, Flowers J. Challenges in deepening prospective teachers' understanding of multiplication through justification. J Math Teacher Educ. 2007;11:5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hough S, Jacob B, Mendoza M, et al. The development of prospective elementary teachers' understandings of children's mathematics. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2011 Apr 8–12; Louisiana, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Holm J, Kajander A. ‘I finally get it!’: developing mathematical understanding during teacher education. Intl J Math Educ Sci Tech. 2012;43:563–574.
   Google Scholar
• Narli S, Baser N. Cantorian set theory and teaching prospective teachers. Intl J Env Sci Educ. 2008;3:99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Banton ML. Using an undergraduate geometry course to challenge pre-service teachers' notions of discourse. J Math Teacher Educ. 2002;5:117–152.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides GJ, Stylianides AJ. Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. J Res Math Educ. 2009;40:314–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden DS, Harries TV, Newton DP. Preservice primary teachers' conceptions of creativity in mathematics. Educ Studies Math. 2010;73:143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriki A. Working like real mathematicians: Developing prospective elementary teachers' awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concepts. Educ Studies Math. 2010;73:159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo S, Christian Smith J. Differences between mathematics majors' view of mathematical proof after lecture-based and problem-based instruction. In: Lamberg T, Wiest LR, editors. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Stateline (NV): University of Nevada, Reno; 2007. p. 84–86.
   Google Scholar
• Enemaker C. A problem-solving based mathematics course and elementary teachers' beliefs. School Sci Math. 1995;96:75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Owens K, Perry B, Conroy J, et al. Responsiveness and effective processes in the interactive construction of understanding in mathematics. Educ Studies Math. 1998;35:105–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hart CH. Preservice teachers' beliefs and practices after participating in an integrated content/methods course. School Sci Math. 2002;1:4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins JLM, Brand BR. Change in preservice teachers' beliefs: an evaluation of a methods course. School Sci Math. 2004;104:226–232.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski CA, Otto DA. Preparing K-8 preservice teachers in a content course for standards-based mathematics pedagogy. School Sci Math. 2010;104:336–350.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews ME, Seaman W. The effects of different undergraduate mathematics courses on the content knowledge and attitude towards mathematics of preservice elementary teachers. Issues Undergrad Prep School Teachers: The Journal. 2007;1:16. Available at:http://www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu/journal/1.contentknowledge/matthews01/article.pdf
   Google Scholar
• King A. From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching. 1993;41:30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Philipp RA. Motivating prospective elementary school teachers to learn mathematics by focusing upon children's mathematical thinking. Issues Teacher Educ. 2008;17:7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Pilburn M, Sawada D, Falconer K, et al. Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). Tempe (AZ): Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gutwill-Wise J. The impact of active and context-based learning in introductory chemistry courses: An early evaluation of the modular approach. J Chem Educ. 2001;78:684–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall MD. The use of questions in teaching. Rev Educ Res. 1970;40:707–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilen WW. Questioning skills, for teachers: what research says to the teacher. Washington (DC): National Education Association; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards S, Bowman MA. Promoting student learning through questioning: a study of classroom questions. J Excel College Teaching. 1996;7:3–24
   Google Scholar
• Kawanaka T, Stigler JW. Teachers' use of questions in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Math Thinking Learning. 1999;1:255–278.
   Google Scholar
• McCrory R, Zhang C, Francis AP, et al. Factors in the achievement of preservice elementary teachers in mathematics classes. Paper presented at: Psychology of Mathematics Education North America Conference; 2009 Sept; Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps G, Liu S, Jones N, et al. Performance trajectory benchmarks for assessments of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Paper presented at: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Presession; 2013 Apr 15–17; Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Fauskanger J, Mosvold R. Studying teachers' knowledge by the use of multiple-choice items: the case of “I'm not sure”. Nordic Studies Math Educ. 2014;19(3–4):41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour E, Wiese D, Hunter A-B, et al. Creating a better mousetrap: On-line student assessment of their learning gains. Paper presented at: 219th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society; 2000 March; San Francisco (CA). Available at: www.salgsite.org/docs/SALGPaperPresentationAtACS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weston T, Seymour E, Lottridge S, et al. The validity of SENCER-SALG online survey for course revision and assessment of student outcomes. 2006. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen SL. From innovation to implementtion: Multi-institution pedagogical reform in undergraduate mathematics. In: King D, Loch B, Rylands L, editors. Proceedings of the 9th DELTA Conference on the Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics; 2013 Nov 24–29; Kiama, New South Wales, Australia. Sydney: University of Western Sydney, School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, on behalf of the International Delta Steering Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Harper NJ, Daane CJ. Causes and reduction of math anxiety in preservice elementary teachers. Action Teacher Educ. 1998;19:29–38.
   Google Scholar
• MacNab DS, Payne F. Beliefs, attitudes and practices in mathematics teaching: perceptions of Scottish primary school student teachers. J Educ Teaching. 2003;29:55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Holm J, Kajander A. Interconnections of knowledge and beliefs in teaching mathematics. Can J Sci Math Tech Educ. 2012;12:7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Malmivuori (Hassi) M-L. The dynamics of affect, cognition, and social environment in the regulation of personal learning processes: The case of mathematics. Research Report 172. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• De Corte E, Verschaffel L, Op't Eynde P. Self-regulation: A characteristic and a goal of mathematics education. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. p. 687–726.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast M, Johnson P, Fitzmaurice O, et al. Mathematical thinking: challenging prospective teachers to do more than ‘talk the talk’. Int J Math Educ Sci Tech. 2014;45:635–647.
   Google Scholar