Applying an alternative mathematics pedagogy for students with weak mathematics: meta-analysis of alternative pedagogies

References

• Markopoulos C, Chaseling M, Petta K, et al. Pre-service teachers' 3D visualization strategies. Creat Educ. 2015;6:1053–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Hill HC, Rowan B, Ball DL. Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. Am Educ Res J. 2005;42:371–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L. Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: standard and procedures. Carlton South: Education Services Australia (for MCEECDYA); 2011. Available from: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/aitsl-research/insights/re00004_accreditation_of_initial_teacher_education_ programs_in_australia_standards_and_procedures_apr_2011.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
   Google Scholar
• AAS [Australian Academy of Science]. The mathematical sciences in Australia: A vision for 2025. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Yeigh T, Woolcott G, Donnelly J, et al. Emotional literacy and pedagogical confidence in pre-service science and mathematics teachers. Aust J Teach Educ. 2016;41:107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd W, Foster A, Smith J, et al. Feeling good about teaching mathematics: addressing anxiety amongst pre-service teachers. Creat Educ. 2014;5:207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Lake W, Boyd W, Boyd W. The propensity of a science-based discipline towards surface learning compared to the arts – a fresh look at two cultures. Creat Educ. 2015;6:1733–1741.
   Google Scholar
• Lake WW, Boyd WE. Is the university system in Australia producing deep thinkers? Aust Univ Rev. 2015;57:54–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke J, Nelson K, Stoodley I. Capability maturity models: a discussion paper and a work in progress – Report prepared for an ALTC Project ‘Establishing a framework for transforming student engagement, success and retention in higher education institutions’. Brisbane:: Queensland University of Technology; 2011. (SESR-MM Report: no. 001.)
   Google Scholar
• Graeber A, Tirosh D. Pedagogical content knowledge. In: Sullivan P, Wood T, editors. International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol1 knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2008. p. 117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. PCK and beyond. In: Sullivan P, Wilson S, editors. International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol1 knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2008. p. 301–322.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven K. Conceptualising mathematical knowledge in teaching. In: Rowland T, Ruthven K, editors. Mathematical knowledge in teaching. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2011. p. 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ossiannilsson E, Williams K, Camilleri A, et al. Quality models in online and open education around the globe. State of the art and recommendations. Oslo: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff L, de Moya-Anegón F, de Nooy W. Aggregated journal-journal citation relations in Scopus and Web-of-Science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlays. J Assoc Info Sci Tech. 2016;67:2194–2211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguillo IF. Is Google scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics. 2011;91:343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman J, van Mourik I, Rasch M, et al. Scopus reviewed and compared: the coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar. Utrecht: Utrecht University Library; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   Google Scholar
• Payne G, Dusenbury RH. An early intervention program for minority science students: fall bridge program. Int J Learn. 2007;14:23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmer TC. An understanding of the improved grades, retention and graduation rates of STEM Majors at the Academic Investment in Math and Science (AIMS) Program of Bowling Green State University (BGSU). J STEM Educ: Innov Res. 2007;8:11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Steyn T, Carr A. Skills development using Logo-experiences with first year engineering students on an extended study programme. Paper presented at: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition; 2008 Jun 22–24; Pittsburg, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Tezcan J, Nicklow J, Mathias J, et al. An innovative freshmen engineering course to improve retention. Paper presented at: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition; 2008 Jun 22–24; Pittsburg, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Shryock KJ, Srinivasa AR, Froyd JE. Developing instruments to assess first-year calculus and physics mechanics skills needed for a sophomore statics and dynamics course. Paper presented at: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE); 2011 Oct 12–15; Rapid City, SD.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R, Mack J. Declines in high school mathematics and science participation: evidence of students’ and future teachers’ disengagement with maths. Int J Innov Sci Math Educ. Conversation. 2014;22:35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Staniec AC, Doerr HM. Flexible and sustainable interventions for mathematics support of first-year students. Paper presented at: 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition; 2012 Jun 10–13; San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Windsor A, Bargagliotti A, Russomanno D, et al. Increasing retention in STEM: results from a STEM talent expansion program at the University of Memphis. J STEM Educ: Innov Res. 2015;16:11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Staehr L, Martin M, Byrne G. An intervention programme for women in computing courses: does it make a difference? IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol. 2001;57:23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta ML. Using emerging technologies to promote student engagement and learning in agricultural mathematics. Int J Learn. 2009;16:497–508.
   Google Scholar
• Steyn T, Steyn J. Active learning and action research – basic attributes of a support course for first year engineering students. Paper presented at: ASEE Annual Conference; 2002 Jun 16–19; Montreal, Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Carr M, Fidalgo C, Bigotte de Almeida ME, et al. Mathematics diagnostic testing in engineering: an international comparison between Ireland and Portugal. Eur J Eng Educ. 2015;40:546–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson M. The effect of peer assisted learning support (PALS) on performance in mathematics and chemistry. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2009;46:381–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basitere M, Ivala E. Addressing the mathematical knowledge gap between high school and first year university chemical engineering mathematics course: the role of facebook. Paper presented at: International Conference on e-Learning; 2014 Jun 26–27; Valparaiso, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Nash JM, Mullins C, Speight H, et al. To cross the digital divide, first leap the language barrier. Paper presented at: 8th IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, WCCE; 2005 Jul 4-7; Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Gyuris E, Everingham Y, Sexton J. Maths anxiety in a first year introductory quantitative skills subject at a regional Australian university – establishing a baseline. Int J Innov Sci Math Educ. 2012;20:42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Daza V, Makriyannis N, Rovira Riera C. MOOC attack: closing the gap between pre-university and university mathematics. Open Learn. 2013;28:227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Croft A, Ward J. A modern and interactive approach to learning engineering mathematics. Br J Educ Technol. 2001;32:195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski B, Robinson C, Matthews J, et al. An activity theory analysis of teaching goals versus student epistemological positions. Int J Tech Math Educ. 2012;19:147–150.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JHF, Eley MG. The development of affective subscales to reflect variation in students' experiences of studying mathematics in higher education. High Educ. 1999;37:197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbit SM, Hummel SR, Piergiovanni PR, et al. A design and assessment-based introductory engineering course. Int J Eng Educ. 2005;21:434–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero ED, Porter SH, Israel T, et al. Math and science pursuits: a self-efficacy intervention comparison study. J Career Assess. 2010;18:362–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremmer M, Brimble M, Freudenberg B, et al. Numeracy of first year commerce students: preliminary analysis of an intervention. Int J Learn. 2010;17:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fonteyne L, De Fruyt F, Dewulf N, et al. Basic mathematics test predicts statistics achievement and overall first year academic success. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2015;30:95–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laoulache RN, Pendergrass NA, Crawford RJ, et al. Integrating engineering courses with calculus and physics to motivate learning of fundamental concepts. Paper presented at: 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference – Impact on Engineering and Science Education; 2001 Oct 10–13; Reno, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Veurink N, Hertel J. Integrating solid modeling and computer programming through a freshman design experience. Paper presented at: 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference; 2008 Oct 22–25; Saratoga Springs, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider L, Terrell M. Applications and confidence inventories for assessing curricular change in introductory engineering mathematics instruction. Paper presented at: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition; 2010 Jun 20–23; Louisville, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider L, Terrell M. Impact of collaborative problem-solving workshops in engineering calculus course on applied mathematical problem-solving skills and self-efficacy perceptions. Paper presented at: 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition; 2011 Jun 26–29; Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Pendergrass NA, Kowalczyk RE, Dowd JP, et al. Improving first-year engineering education. J Eng Educ. 2001;90:33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan JF, Myers BA, O'Connor K, et al. Continuously improving a diversity-bolstering system through integrating quantitative and qualitative engineering GoldShirt program facets. Paper presented at: 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society; 2015 Jun 14–17; Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Du Preez J, Steyn T, Owen R. Mathematical preparedness for tertiary mathematics – a need for iodised intervention in the first year? Perspect Educ. 2008;26:49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht J, Harding A. Interventions to improve teaching and learning in first year mathematics courses. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2015;46:1046–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquez RB, Auzenne M, Green S, et al. Building a foundation for pre-calculus engineering freshmen through an integrated learning community. Paper presented at: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World; 2005 Jun 12–15; Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkes EJ, Isaac PS, Scharaschkin V. Assessment of an innovative system of lecture notes in first-year mathematics. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2009;40:495–504.
   Google Scholar
• Barragués JI, Guisasola J. Who built the Egyptian pyramids? The use of computational tools in solving problems to make students think about randomness. Math Comput Educ. 2009;43:53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Savitz RM, Savitz FR. Experience matters: innovative techniques add up to mathematical achievement. Primus: Probl, Resour Issues Math Undergrad Stud. 2010;20:517–528.
   Google Scholar
• Cervesato I. Discovering logic through comics. Paper presented at: ITiCSE'11 – 16th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science; 2011 June 27–29; Darmstadt, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Marosi KT, Steinhurst B. Lights, camera, action! Increasing first-year engineering student academic performance via an innovative pre-orientation program. Paper presented at: 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition; 2013 Jun 23–26; Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkes EJ, Loch BI, Stace AW. An innovative learning model for computation in first year mathematics. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2005;36:751–759.
   Google Scholar
• Maykut P, Morehouse R. Beginning qualitative research: a philosophic and practical guide. London: Falmer Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb I, Findlay C, Du L, et al. Mathematics, engineering and science in the national interest. Canberra: Office of the Chief Scientist; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Forgasz H, Rivera F, editors. Towards equity in mathematics education: gender, culture, and diversity. Berlin: Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard CL, Johnson MF. Basic math skills and performance in an introductory economics class. J Econ Educ. 2004;35:3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolley PA, Blat C, McDaniel C, et al. Enhancing the mathematics skills of students enrolled in introductory engineering courses: eliminating the gap in incoming academic preparation. J STEM Educ: Innov Res. 2012;13:74–86.
   Google Scholar
• Kajander A, Lovric M. Transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics: McMaster University experience. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2005;36:149–160.
   Google Scholar