The effects of GeoGebra software on pre-service mathematics teachers’ attitudes and views toward proof and proving

References

• Hanna G. Proof, explanation and exploration: an overview. Educ Stud Math. 2000;44:5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth EJ. Secondary school mathematics teachers' conceptions of proof. J Res Math Educ. 2002;33(5):379–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers M. Rethinking proof with the Geometer's Sketchpad. Emeryville (CA): Key Curriculum; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna G. Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange. 1990;21(1):6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld A. What do we know about mathematics curricula? J Math Behav. 1994;13:55–80.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida D. Pupil's proof potential. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2001;32(1):53–60.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston (VA): NCTM; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Doruk M, Kaplan A. Prospective elementary mathematics teachers’ conceptions regarding mathematical proof. Int J Turk Educ Sci. 2014;2(3):71–93.
   Google Scholar
• Keçeli-Bozdağ S, Uğurel I, Bukova-Güzel E. Development of attitude scale towards proof and proving: the case of mathematics student teachers. Kastamonu Education Journal. 2015;23(4):1585–1600.
   Google Scholar
• Doruk M, Güler G. Prospective elementary mathematics teachers’ conceptions regarding mathematical proof. Int J Turk Educ Sci. 2014;2(3):71–93.
   Google Scholar
• Jones K. The student experience of mathematical proof at university level. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2000;31(1):53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Jones K, Gutierrez A, Mariotti MA. Proof in dynamic geometry environments. Special Issue Educ Stud Math. 2000;44(1–2):1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg EP. Ruminations about dynamic imagery (and a strong pea for research). In: Sutherland R, Mason J, editors. Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education. Berlin: Springer; 1995. p. 202–224.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyles C, Noss R. What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education? In: Bishop AJ, Clements MA, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Leung FKS, editors. Second international handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. p. 323–349.
   Google Scholar
• Gravina MA. Dynamical visual proof: what does it mean? Paper presented at: XI International Congress on Mathematical Education; 2008 July 6–13; Monterrey.
   Google Scholar
• Jones K. Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: students' interpretations when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educ Stud Math. 2000;44(1):55–85.
   Google Scholar
• Iranzo-Domenech N. Influence of dynamic geometry software on plane geometry problem solving strategies [dissertation]. Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Burke M, Kennedy P. GeoGebra: from simulation to formalization in teacher preparation and inservice programs. In: Bu L, Schoen R, editors. Model-centered learning pathways to mathematical understanding using GeoGebra. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2011. p. 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• De las Peñas MLAN, Bautista D. The emerging role of GeoGebra in the Philippines. In: Bu L, Schoen R, editors. Model-centered learning pathways to mathematical understanding using GeoGebra. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2011. p. 217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Bakar KA, Ayub AFM, Luan WS, et al. Exploring secondary school students’ motivation using technologies in teaching and learning mathematics. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):4650–4654.
   Google Scholar
• Choi KS. Motivating students in learning mathematics with GeoGebra. Ann Comput Sci Series. 2010;8(2):65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gunčaga J. GeoGebra as a motivational tool for teaching according new curriculum in Slovakia. GGIJRO-GeoGebra Int J Romania. 2011;2(1):277–282.
   Google Scholar
• Green DR, Robinson CL. Introducing GeoGebra to foundation year students. MSOR Connect. 2009;9(2):6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ayvaz Reis Z, Özdemir Ş. Using GeoGebra as an information technology tool: parabola teaching. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;9:565–572.
   Google Scholar
• Zengin Y, Furkan H, Kutluca T. The effect of dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;31:183–187.
   Google Scholar
• Saha RA, Ayub AFM, Tarmizi RA. The effects of GeoGebra on mathematics achievement: enlightening coordinate geometry learning. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;8:686–693.
   Google Scholar
• Ayvaz Reis Z. Computer supported mathematics with GeoGebra. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;9:1449–1455.
   Google Scholar
• Botana F, Hohenwarter M, Janičić P, et al. Automated theorem proving in GeoGebra: current achievements. J Autom Reason. 2015;55(1):39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers M. Developing understanding for different roles of proof in dynamic geometry. Paper presented at: ProfMat; 2002 October 2–4; Visue.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers M. Using dynamic geometry to expand mathematics teachers’ understanding of proof, Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2004;35(5):703–724.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde C. Dynamic geometry environments as a source of rich learning contexts for the complex activity of proving. Educ Stud Math. 2000;44(1):151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Christou C, Mousoulides N, Pittalis M, et al. Proofs through exploration in dynamic geometry environments. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2004;2(3):339–352.
   Google Scholar
• İpek S, Akkuş İspir O. Preservice elementary mathematics teachers' geometric and algebraic proof process with dynamic geometry software. Turk J Comput Math Educ (TURCOMAT). 2011;2(1):20–34.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2nd ed. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan JH, Schumacher S. Research in education: evidence-based inquiry. 7th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson Education, Inc.; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Keçeli-Bozdağ S. The correlation between attitudes towards proving with proving skills of the prospective mathematics teachers [dissertation]. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• GeoGebra.org [Internet]. Linz: International GeoGebra Institute; c2001–2016 [cited 2016 June 21]. Available from: https://www.geogebra.org/
   Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter J, Hohenwarter M. Introduction to GeoGebra 4.4. 2013 [ cited 2016 June 12]. Available from: http://static.geogebra.org/book/intro-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strausova I, Hasek R. “Dynamic visual proofs” using DGS. Electron J Math Technol. 2013;7(2):130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas GB, Weir MD, Hass JR. Thomas Kalkülüs [ Thomas calculus]. 12th ed. Bayram M, translator. İstanbul: Pearson Egitim Cözümleri [Pearson Education Solutions]; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Coxeter HSM, Greitzer SL. Geometry revisited. Washington (DC): The Mathematical Association of America; 1967. Available from: http://www.aproged.pt/biblioteca/geometryrevisited_ coxetergreitzer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Needham T. Visual complex analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc.; 1997. Available from: http://umv.science.upjs.sk/hutnik/NeedhamVCA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kung SH. Proof without words: the law of cosines. Math Mag. 1990;63(5):342.
   Google Scholar
• Kung SH. Proof without words: the law of cosines via Ptolemy's theorem. Math Mag. 1992;65(2):103.
   Google Scholar
• Weisstein EW. "Law of cosines." From MathWorld – a Wolfram web resource. Available from: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LawofCosines.html
   Google Scholar
• Sipka TA. Proof without words: the law of cosines for θ < π/2. Math Mag. 1988;61(4):259.
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen RB. Proofs without words exercises in visual thinking. Washington (DC): The Mathematical Association of America; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Stonebridge B. A simple geometric proof of Morley's trisector theorem. Mathematical Spectrum. 2009;42(1):2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Peck R, Olsen C, Devore JL. Introduction to statistics and data analysis. 4th ed. Boston (MA): Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [ Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. 8th ed. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing; 2011.
   Google Scholar