Understanding and supporting teacher horizon knowledge around limits: a framework for evaluating textbooks for teachers

References

• Macaulay A. Effective practices in grade 9 applied mathematics [dissertation]. Toronto (ON): University of Toronto; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Suurtamm C, Graves B. Curriculum implementation intermediate math: research report executive summary. Ottawa (ON): University of Ottawa, Faculty of Education; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston (VA): NCTM; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. The Ontario curriculum grades 1-8: mathematics. Toronto (ON): Queen's Printer for Ontario; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kajander A, Zuke C, Walton G. Teaching unheard voices: students at risk in mathematics. Can J Educ. 2008;31(4):1039–1064.
   Google Scholar
• Melville W. Curriculum reform and the science department: a Bourdieuian analysis. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2010;8(6):971–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart LC, Oesterle S, Swars S. The juxtaposition of instructor and student perspectives on mathematics courses for elementary teachers. Educ Stud Math. 2013;83(3):429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith LT, Doerr HM, Lewis CC. Mathematics teachers’ learning: a conceptual framework and synthesis of research. J Math Teach Educ. 2014;17:5–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kajander A. Teachers constructing concepts of mathematics for teaching and learning: “It's like the roots beneath the surface, not a bigger garden”. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2010;10(2):87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kajander A, Lovric M. Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2009;40(2):173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol CC, Crespo SM. Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: how preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educ Stud Math. 2006;62(3):331–355.
   Google Scholar
• Yang KL. A framework for analyzing textbooks based on the notion of abstraction. Learn Math. 2013;33(1):33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ball DL, Thames MH, Phelps G. Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? J Teach Educ. 2008;59(5):389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skemp R. The psychology of learning mathematics. New York (NY): Penguin; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Biza I, Souyoul A, Zachariades T. Conceptual change in advanced mathematical thinking. Discussion paper, 4th Congress of ERME; 2005 Feb 17–21; Sant Feliu de Guı´xols, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Davis J. In: Orey M editor. Conceptual change, in emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology (e-book); 2001. Available from: http://www.coe.uga.edu/ epltt/ConceptualChange.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lovric M. Collaboration between research in mathematics education and teaching mathematics: case study of teaching infinity in calculus. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group; 2012 May 25–29; Université Laval, p. 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell R, Charalambous C, Hill H. Examining the task and knowledge demands needed to teach with representations. J Math Teach Educ. 2014;17:37–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kajander A. Mathematics teacher preparation in an era of curriculum change: the development of mathematics for teaching. Can J Educ. 2010;33(1):228–255.
   Google Scholar
• Kajander A, Holm J. Prospective teachers' mathematical understanding: searching for differences based on school curriculum background. Fld Math Educ J. 2013;1(1):3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman NH, Stockton JC. Horizon content knowledge in the work of teaching: a focus on planning. Learn Math. 2013;33(3):20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Holm J, Kajander A. The relationship between undergraduate major and specialised content knowledge when entering methods courses. In: Oesterle S, Nicol C, Liljedahl P, Allan D, editors. Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36; Vancouver, CA; 2014. p. 6–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kidron I, Tall D. The roles of visualization and symbolism in the potential and actual infinity of the limit process. Educ. Stud. Math. 2015;88:183–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tall D. The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: functions, limits, infinity, and proof. In: Grouws D, editor. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York (NY): Macmillan; 1992. p. 495–511.
   Google Scholar
• Jones SR. Calculus limits involving infinity: the role of students’ informal dynamic reasoning. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2015;46(1):105–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehrtman M. Collapsing dimensions, physical limitation, and other student metaphors for limit concepts. J Res Math Educ. 2009; 40(4): 396–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolar VM, Cadez TH. Analysis of factors influencing the understanding of the concept of infinity. Educ Stud Math. 2012; 80:389–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan J. Problems with the language of limits. Learn Math. 1991;11(3):20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bekdemir M. The pre-service teachers’ mathematics anxiety related to depth of negative experiences in mathematics classroom while they were students. Educ Stud Math. 2010;75(3):311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck DJ, Banilower ER, Weiss IR, Rosenberg SL. (2008). Studying the effects of professional development: case of the NSF's local systemic change through teacher initiative. J Res Math Educ. 2008:39(2):113–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajander A, Boland T. Mathematical models for teaching: reasoning without memorization. Toronto (ON): Canadian Scholars' Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brown T et al., Math makes sense 8. Ontario (ON): Pearson Education Canada Inc.; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Musser GL, Peterson BE, Burger, WF. Mathematics for elementary teachers: a contemporary approach. 10th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Small M. Big ideas from Dr. Small: creating a comfort zone for teaching mathematics grades 4–8. Toronto (ON): Nelson Education; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Van deWalle JA, Bay-Williams JM, Lovin LA, Karp KS. Teaching student-centered mathematics: developmentally appropriate instruction for grades 6-8. 2nd ed. Boston (MA): Pearson Professional Development; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Anhalt C, Cortez R. Developing understanding of mathematical modeling in secondary teacher preparation. J Math Teacher Educ. 2016;19:523–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar