Enhancing student engagement to positively impact mathematics anxiety, confidence and achievement for interdisciplinary science subjects

References

• Commonwealth of Australia. Mathematics, engineering & science in the national interest. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis J, Fosdick BK, Rasmussen C. Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0157447. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varsavsky C. Chances of success in and engagement with mathematics for students who enter university with a weak mathematics background. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2010;41:1037–1049.
   Google Scholar
• Macher D, Paechter M, Papousek, et al. Statistics anxiety, trait anxiety, learning behavior, and academic performance. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2012;27:483–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowker A, Sarkar A, Looi CY. Mathematics anxiety: what have we learned in 60 years? Front Psychol. 2016;7:508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias S. Overcoming math anxiety. New York: Norton; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft MH. Math anxiety: personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2002;11:181–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopko DR, Mahadevan R, Bare RL, et al. The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS): construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment. 2003;10:178–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart VB. Math curse or math anxiety. Teach Child Math. 2000;6:330–335.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson M. Addressing math anxiety in the classroom. Improv Sch. 2014;17:99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu DB. The influence of socioeconomic status, self-efficacy, and anxiety on mathematics achievement in England, Greece, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the USA. Educ Sci: Theory Pract. 2015;15:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin A, Kurbanoglu I. The relationships between math anxiety, mathattitudes and self efficacy: a structural equation model. Stud Psychol. 2011;53:263–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hembree R. The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. J Res Math Educ. 1990;21:33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone A. Teaching in higher education – there isn't enough evidence to tell us what works and why. The Conversation Australia; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler V. Student engagement literature review. York: The Higher Education Academy; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kahu ER. Framing student engagement in higher education. Stud High Educ. 2013;38:758–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke N. Student engagement: a complex business supporting the first year experience in tertiary education. Int J First Year High Educ. 2013;4:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce R, Stacey K, Barkatsas A. A scale for monitoring students attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Comput Educ. 2007;48:285–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkatsas A, Kasimatis K, Gialamas V. Learning secondary mathematics with technology: exploring the complex interrelationship between students’ attitudes, engagement, gender and achievement. Comput Educ. 2009;52:562–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windham C. The student perspective. 2005. In: Educating the net generation [Internet]. Brockport Bookshelf; [5.1-5.16]. Available from: http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1278&context=bookshelf.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor L, Parsons J. Improving student engagement. Curr Issues Educ. 2011;14:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Coates H, Edwards D, Goedgebuure L, et al. Profiling diversity of Australian universities. Melbourne: LH Martin Institue and the Australian Council for Educational Research; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh GD. Assessing what really matters to student learning inside. The national survey of student engagement change. Mag High Learn. 2001;33:10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun R, Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Academic emotions and student engagement. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C, editors. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York (NY): Springer; 2012. p. 259–282.
   Google Scholar
• Dew KMH, Galassi JP, Galassi MD. Math anxiety: relation with situational test anxiety, performance, physiological arousal, and math avoidance behavior. J Couns Psychol. 1984;31:580–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft MH, Kirk EP. The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. J Exp Psychol: Gen. 2001;130:224–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft MH, Faust MW. Mathematics anxiety and mentalarithmetic performance: an exploratory investigation. Cogn Emot. 1994;8:97–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipman SF, Krantz DH, Silver R. Mathematics anxiety and science careers among able college women. Psychol Sci. 1992;3:292–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plake BS, Parker CS. The development and validation of a revised version of the mathematics anxiety rating scale. Educ Psychol Meas. 1982;42:551–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielberger CD, Gorsuch R, Lushene R, et al. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Everingham YE, Gyuris E, Sexton JD. Using student feedback to improve student attitudes and mathematical confidence in a first year interdisciplinary quantitative course: from the ashes of disaster! Int J Math Educ Sci Technol.. 2013;44:877–892.
   Google Scholar
• Nilson LB. Creating self-regulated learners. Sterling, (VA): Stylus Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar