An analysis of context-based similarity tasks in textbooks from Brazil and the United States

References

• Haggarty, L, Pepin, B. An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educ Res J. 2002;28:567–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, GA, Bianchi, LJ, Wolfe, RG, et al. According to the book. Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, L. Textbook research as scientific research: Towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on mathematics textbooks. ZDM – Int J Math Educ. 2013;45:765–777.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, WH, McKnight, CC, Valverde, GA, et al. Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wijaya, A, Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M, Doorman, M. Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educ Stud Math. 2015;89:41–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, C. Toward a revised theory of general intelligence: Further examination of fluid cognitive abilities as unique aspects of human cognition. Behav Brain Sci. 2006;29(2):145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, MD, Smith, MS. Transforming secondary mathematics teaching: increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers’ classrooms. J Res Math Educ. 2009;40:119–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. Working in mathematics classes: The context of students' thinking during the instruction. Educ Psychol. 1988;23:167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, DL, Tarr, JE. An examination of the levels of cognitive demand required by probability tasks in middle grades mathematics textbooks. Stat Educ Res J. 2007;6(2):4–27.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, MK, Grover, BW, Henningsen, M. Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educ Res J. 1996;33:455–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, N, Mesa, V. Describing cognitive orientation of Calculus I tasks across different types of coursework. ZDM. 2014;46:675–690.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, L, Castro, E, Coriat, M, et al. Bases teóricas del currículo de matemáticas en educación secundaria. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Charalambos, Y, Delaneyb, S, Hsuc, H, et al. A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Math Think Learn. 2010;12(2):117–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, L, Zhu, Y, Miao, Z. Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM - Int J Math Educ 2013;45:633–646.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. J Res Math Educ. 2011;31:234–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K, Fujita, T. Interpretations of national curricula: The case of geometry in textbooks from England and Japan. ZDM – Int J Math Educ. 2013;45:671–683.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. A model of school learning. Teach Coll Rec. 1963;64:723–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husén, T, editor. International study of achievement in mathematics textbooks: A comparison of twelve countries. Vol. 2. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Floden, RE. The measurement of opportunity to learn. In: Porter AC, Gamoran A editors. Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002. p. 231–266.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X. Linking competence to opportunities to learn: Models of competence and data mining. New York, NY: Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L. Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1995;17:305–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornroos, J. Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Stud Educ Eval. 2005;31:315–327.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, JA, Cuevas, G, Day, R, et al. Integrated Math. Vol. 2. Columbus, OH: McGraw Hill; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dietiker, LC, Brakonieck, A. Reading geometrically: The negotiation of the expected meaning of diagrams in geometry textbooks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development (ICMT); Southampton: University of Southampton; 2014. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S, Silver, EA. Equity and validity considerations in the design and implementation of a mathematics performance assessment: The experience of the QUASAR project. In Nettles MT, Nettles AL editor. Equity and excellence in educational testing and assessment. New York, NY: Springer; 1995. p. 185–219.
   Google Scholar
• Centurión, M, Jakubovic, J. Matemática: teoria e contexto. São Paulo: Saraiva; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kanold, TD, Burger, EB, Dixon, JK, et al. Integrated mathematics. Orlando, FL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardo, FM. Projeto araribá: Matemática. São Paulo: Moderna; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, JR, Pataro, PRM. Vontade de saber. São Paulo: FTD; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, MK, Smith, MS, Henningsen, MA, et al. Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction. Book Rev. 2001;33:3.
   Google Scholar