Exploring cardinality in the era of touchscreen-based technology

References

• Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon. 2001;9(5):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sarama J, Clements DH. Teaching math in the primary grades: the learning trajectories approach. YC Young Children. 2009;64(2):63.
   Google Scholar
• Ladel S, Kortenkamp U. Early mathematics learning. Springer; 2014. Chapter 15, Number concepts – processes of internalization and externalization by the use of multi-touch technology; p. 237–253.
   Google Scholar
• Lane J. A Multimodal discourse on the use of touch enabled mobile devices for mathematics education. In: Meletiou-Mavrotheris M, editor. Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contemporary mathematics education. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2015. p. 214–240.
   Google Scholar
• Geist EA. A qualitative examination of two-year-olds interaction with tablet-based interactive technology. J Instr Psychol. 2012;39(1):26.
   Google Scholar
• Couse LJ, Chen DW. A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. J Res Technol Educ. [Internet]. 2010;43(1):75–98. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=53500538&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Chau CL. Positive technological development for young children in the context of children's mobile apps [dissertation]. Medford (MA): Tufts University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair N, Sedaghatjou M. Finger counting and adding on a touchscreen device. In: Ubuz B, Haser C, Mariotti M, editors. Proceedings of the 8th Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 8); 2013 Feb 6–10; Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University; 2013. p. 2198–2208.
   Google Scholar
• Fuson KC. Children's counting and concepts of number. 2nd ed. Evanston (IL): Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn K. Children's acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cogn Psychol. 1992;24(2):220–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan NC, Kaplan D, Nabors Olah L, et al.. Number sense growth in kindergarten: a longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Dev. 2006;77(1):153–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements DH, Sarama J. Learning and teaching early math: the learning trajectories approach. New York (NY): Routledge; 2014. Chapter 6, Arithmetic: composition of number, place value; p. 93–124.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman R, Meck E. Preschoolers’ counting: principles before skill. Cognition [Internet]. 1983;13(3):343–359. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/0010027783900148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick LB, Bill V, Lesgold S, et al. Thinking in arithmetic class. Washington (DC): ERIC Clearinghouse; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Brissiaud R, Greenbaum CT. A tool for number construction: finger symbol sets. In: Bideaud J, Meljac C, Fischer J, editors. Pathways to number: children's developing numerical abilities. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1992. p. 41–65.
   Google Scholar
• Domahs F, Moeller K, Huber S, et al. Embodied numerosity: implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures. Cognition [Internet]. 2010;116(2):251–266. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller K, Fischer U, Link T, et al. Learning and development of embodied numerosity. Cogn Process. 2012;13(1 SUPPL):271–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth B. The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Crollen V, Mahe R, Collignon O, et al. The role of vision in the development of finger-number interactions: finger-counting and finger-montring in blind children. J Exp Child Psychol. [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2012 Nov 18];109(4):525–539. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21497826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Luca S, Granà A, Semenza C, et al. Finger–digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processing. Q J Exp Psychol. 2006;59(9):1648–1663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender A, Beller S. Fingers as a tool for counting-naturally fixed or culturally flexible? Frontiers in Psychology. 2011;2(256):10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Domahs F, Moeller K, Huber S, et al. Embodied numerosity: implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures. Cognition [Internet]. 2010;116(2):251–66. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0010027710001095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackiw N, Sinclair N. TouchCounts [software application for the iPad]. Canada: Simon Fraser University; 2014. Available from: https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/touchcounts/id897302197?mt=8
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair N, Heyd-Metzuyanim E. Learning number with TouchCounts: the role of emotions and the body in mathematical communication. Technol Knowl Learn. 2014;19(1–2):81–99.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair N, Pimm D. Number's subtle touch: expanding finger gnosis in the era of multi-touch technologies. In: Allan D, Liljedahl P, Nicol C, Oesterle S, editors. Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education: PME 38/PME-NA 36; 2014 Jul 15–20; Vancouver Canada: Lebonfon; 2014. p. 209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff G, Núñez R. Where mathematics comes from: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York (NY): Basic Books; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Vergnaud G. The theory of conceptual fields. Hum Dev. 2009;52(2):83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky R, Kelton ML, Rhodehamel B. Playing mathematical instruments: emerging perceptuomotor integration with an interactive mathematics exhibit. J Res Math Educ. [Internet]. 2013;44(2):372–415. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 10.5951/jresematheduc.44.2.0372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell SR. Preservice teachers' understanding of elementary number theory: qualitative constructivist research situated within a Kantian framework for understanding educational inquiry [dissertation]. Vancouver (BC): Simon Fraser University; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell SR. Constructivism and the limits of reason: revisiting the Kantian problematic. Stud Philos Educ. 2002;21(6):421–445.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl E. 1991. On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time, trans. by JB Brough. Vol. 39. Kluwer Academics; p. 84–88.
   Google Scholar
• Arzarello F. Semiosis as a multimodal process. RELIME. Revista latinoamericana de investigación en matemática educativa. 2006;9(1):267–300.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas E, Sinclair N. New materialist ontologies in mathematics education: the body in/of mathematics. Educ Stud Math. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2013 Oct 18];83(3):453–470. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10649-012-9465-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford L. Towards an embodied, cultural, and material conception of mathematics cognition. ZDM. 2014;46(3):349–361.
   Google Scholar
• Roth W-M, Thom JS. Bodily experience and mathematical conceptions: from classical views to a phenomenological reconceptualization. Educ Stud Math. [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2012 Nov 15];70(2):175–189. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10649-008-9138-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousands Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Incorporated; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hall R, Ma JY, Nemirovsky R. Re-scaling bodies in/as representational instruments in GPS drawing. In: Victor RL, editor. Learning technologies and the body: integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments. New York (NY): Routledge; 2015. p. 112–132.
   Google Scholar