Various solution methods, accompanied by dynamic investigation, for the same problem as a means for enriching the mathematical toolbox

References

• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston (VA): NCTM; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Polya G. How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld AH. Mathematical problem solving. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Krutetskii VA. The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Teller J, translator; Kilpatrick J, Wirszuy I, editors. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Silver EA. Foresting creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM. 1997;3:75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D. Teachers as mentors to encourage both power and simplicity in active material learning. Plenary Lecture at the Third Annual Conference for Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Computing; 2007 Mar 17–19. Abu-Dhabi (UAE): Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Computing (METSMaC); 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Liekin R, Lev H. Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In: Wo JH, Lew HC, Park KS, Seo DY, editors. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol. 3; 2007 Jul 8–13; Seoul, Korea. Seoul (Korea): The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics; 2007. p. 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Polya G. Mathematical discovery: on understanding learning and teaching problem solving. New York (NY): Wiley; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld AH. When good teaching leads to bad results: the disasters of “well-taught” mathematics courses. Educ Psychol. 1988;23(2): 145–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersoz FA. Proof in different mathematical domains. ICME Study. 2009;1:160–165.
   Google Scholar
• Levav-Waynberg A, Leikin R. Multiple solutions for a problem: a tool for evaluation of mathematical thinking in geometry. In: Durand-Guerrier V, Soury-Lavergne S, Arzarello F, editors. Proceedings of CERME 6; 2009 Jan 28–Feb 1; Lyon. Paris (France): Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique; 2009. p. 776–785.
   Google Scholar
• Liekin R. Multiple proof tasks: teacher practice and teacher education. ICME Study 19. 2009;2:31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Haddas N, Hershkovitz R. The role of uncertainty in constructing and proving in computerized environment. In: Zaslavsky O, editor. Proceedings of PME 23: Psychology of Mathematics Education 23rd International Conference. Vol. 3; 1999 Jul 25–30; Haifa. Haifa (Israel): Technion; 1999. p. 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyles C, Healy L. The curricular shaping of students' approaches to proof. For Learn Math. 1999;17(1): 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sigler A, Segal R, Stupel M. Surprising geometrical properties that are obtained by transforming any quadrilateral into a lattice. Electron J Math Technol. 2017;11(1):58–66.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers M. An alternative approach to proof in dynamic geometry. In: Lehrer R, Chazan D, editors. Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998. p. 369–394.
   Google Scholar
• Silver EA, Mamona J. Problem posing by middle school mathematics teachers. In: Maher CA, Goldin GA, Davis RB, editors. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education; 1989 Sep 20–23; The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University; 1989. p. 263–269.
   Google Scholar
• Hoehn L. Problem posing in geometry. Math Teach. 1991;91(1):10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brown S, Walter M. The art of problem posing. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Franklin Institute Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Brown S, Walter M. Problem posing: reflection and applications. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Leung A, Lopez-Real FJ. Theorem justification and acquisition in dynamic geometry: a case of proof by contradiction. Int J Comput Math Learn. 2002;7(2):145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Stupel M, Ben-Chaim D. One problem, multiple solutions: how multiple proofs can connect several areas of mathematics. Far East J Math Educ. 2013;11(2):129–161.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Chaim D, Katz S, Stupel M. Variance- and invariance-focused instruction in dynamic geometry environments to foster mathematics self-efficacy. Far East J Math Educ. 2016;16(4):371–418.
   Google Scholar
• House PA, Coxford AF. Connecting mathematics across the curriculum: 1995 yearbook. Reston (VA): NCTM; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld AH. When good teaching leads to bad results: the disasters of “well-taught” mathematics courses. Educ Psychol. 1988;23(2):145–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingolbali E. Multiple solutions to problems in mathematics teaching: do teachers really value them? Aust J Teach Educ. 2011;36(1):18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Skemp R. Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Math Teach. 1976;77:20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jones K, Gutierrez A, Mariotti MA. Proof in dynamic geometry environments: guest editorial. Educ Stud Math. 2000;44:1–3.
   Google Scholar