Pedagogical alternatives for triple integrals: moving towards more inclusive and personalized learning

References

• Pólya G. How to solve it. A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Pólya G. Mathematical discovery: on understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving. New York (NY): Wiley; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld AH. Problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: a report, recommendations, and an annotated bibliography. Washington (DC): Mathematical Association of America, Committee on the Teaching of Undergraduate Mathematics; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Yackel E, Cobb P. Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. J Res Math Educ. 1996;27(4):458–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver EA, Ghousseini H, Gosen D, et al. Moving from rhetoric to praxis: issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. J Math Behav. 2005;24:287–301.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce R, Stacey K, Wander R, et al. The design of lessons using mathematics analysis software to support multiple representations in secondary school mathematics. Technol Pedagogy Educ. 2011;20(1):95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans S, Swan M. Developing students strategies for problem solving. Educ Design. 2014;2(7). Available from: http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume2/issue7/article25/
   Google Scholar
• Executive Summary, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Available from: http://tinyurl.com/y8yjhhhw
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson B, Star JR. Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. J Educ Psychol. 2007;99(3):561–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levav-Waynberg A, Leikin R. Multiple solutions for a problem: a tool for evaluation of mathematical thinking in geometry. In: Pitta-Pantazi D, Philippou G, editors. Proceedings of CERME 6; 2009 Jan 28–Feb 1; Lyon. Cyprus: University of Cyprus; 2009. Available from: http://ife.ens-lyon.fr/publications/edition-electronique/cerme6/wg5-11-levav-leikin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leikin R. Habits of mind associated with advanced mathematical thinking and solution spaces of mathematical tasks. In: Durand-Guerrier V, Soury-Lavergne S, Arzarello F, editors. Paper presented in the Working Group on Advanced Mathematical Thinking, CERME-5, Cyprus. Lyon (France): Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin R, Levav-Waynberg A. Solution spaces of multiple-solution connecting tasks as a mirror of the development of mathematics teachers’ knowledge. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2008;8(3):233–251.
   Google Scholar
• Love E, Pimm D. ‘This is so’: a text on texts. In: Bishop A, Clements MA (Ken), Keitel-Kreidt C, Kilpatrick J, Laborde C, editors. International handbook of mathematics education. Vol. 4, Springer International Handbooks of Education. Netherlands: Springer; 1996. p. 371–409. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0
   Google Scholar
• Ross G, Aristotle. Aristotle De sensu and De memoria; text and translation, with introduction and commentary. Cambridge: The University Press; 1906. Available from: https://archive.org/details/aristotledesensu00arisuoft
   Google Scholar
• Tamer M. Multiple methods: when it comes to solving math problems, it pays to compare. April 13, 2015. Usable Knowledge https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/15/04/multiple-methods
   Google Scholar
• Mayo P. Gramsci, Freire and adult education: possibilities for transformative action. London: Zed Books; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Larson R, Hostetler RP, Edwards BH. Calculus with analytic geometry. Lexington (MA): D.C. Heath; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas G, Weir MD, Hass J, et al. Thomas’ calculus, media upgrade: international edition. Boston (MA): Pearson Addison Wesley; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Trim DW. Calculus for engineers. Toronto (ON): Prentice Hall; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RA. Calculus of several variables. Don Mills (ON): Addison-Wesley; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs WL, Cochran L, Gillett B. Calculus: international edition. Boston (MA): Pearson Education; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hass J, Weir MD, Thomas GB. University calculus elements. Boston (MA): Pearson Addison Wesley; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards CH, Penney DE. Calculus and analytic geometry. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Chouinard LG. Classroom notes: iterated integrals: an algebraic approach. International J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2003;34(3):451–459. doi:10.1080/0020739031000071467/451-459
   Google Scholar
• Tisdell CC. Critical perspectives of pedagogical approaches to reversing the order of integration in double integrals. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2017;1–8. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2017.1329559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmehr F, Drake M. Exploring students’ mathematical performance, metacognitive experiences and skills in relation to fundamental theorem of calculus. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2017;1–29. doi:10.1080/0020739x.2017.1305129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempson PW. Repeated integration by parts. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 1983;14(4):437–439. doi:10.1080/0020739830140407
   Google Scholar
• Bingolbali E. Multiple solutions to problems in mathematics teaching: do teachers really value them? Australian J Teach Educ. 2011;36(1):18–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n1.2
   Google Scholar
• Leikin R, Levav-Waynberg A. Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks. Educ Studies Math. 2007;66:349–371.
   Google Scholar