Time allocated to mathematics in post-primary schools in Ireland: are we in double trouble?

References

• Benavot A, Amadi M. A global study of intended instruction time and official school curricula, 1980–2000. Geneva: IBE; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Smith B. Quantity matters: annual instruction time in an urban school system. Educ Adm Q. 2011;36(5):652–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karweit NL. Time on task reconsidered: synthesis of research on time and learning. Educ Leadersh. 1984;41(8):32–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, JB. The Carroll Model: a 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educ Res. 1989;18:26–31. DOI:10.3102/0013189X018001026
   Google Scholar
• Judson, E. The relationship between time allocated for science in elementary schools and state accountability policies. Sci Educ. 2013;97:621–636. DOI:10.1002/sce.21058/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harn BA, Thompson SL, Roberts G. Intensifying instruction: does additional instruction time make a difference for most at-risk first graders? J Learn Disabil. 2008;41(2):115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps P, Corey D, De Monte J, et al. How much English language arts and mathematics instruction do students receive? Investigating variation in instructional time. Educ Policy. 2012;26(5):631–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice JK, Croninger RG, Roellke C. The effect of block scheduling high school mathematics courses on student achievement and teachers’ use of time: implications for educational productivity. Econ Educ Rev. 2002;21(6):599–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). Education at a glance 2013 indicators: a country profile for Ireland. Dublin: DES; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice Network. Mathematics education in Europe: common challenges and national policies. Brussels: Eurydice; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. The Ontario Curriculum Grades 11 and 12: mathematics. Ontario: Ministry of Education (Queen's Printer); 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn L, Lawrenz F, Schultz MJ. Block scheduling and mathematics: enhancing standards-based instruction. NASSP Bull. 2005;89(642):14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). Report of the Project Maths implementation support group. Dublin: DES; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast M, Johnson P, Fitzmaurice O, et al. Mathematical thinking: challenging prospective teachers to do more than ‘talk the talk’. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2014;45(5):635–647.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffes J, Jones E, Wilson M, et al. Research into the impact of Project Maths. Berkshire: National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER); 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Irish Mathematics Teachers Association (IMTA). Project Maths and the Irish maths teachers association. Cork: IMTA; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Beggy E, O'Meara, N. Is there enough time allocated to mathematics in post-primary mathematics education [undergraduate thesis]. Limerick: University of Limerick; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast M, O'Meara, N. A profile of mathematics instruction time in Irish second level schools. Irish Educ Stud. 2016;36(2):133–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove J, Perkins R, Shiel G, et al. Teaching and learning in Project Maths. Dublin: Educational Research Centre (ERC); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Research Centre (ERC). Teaching and learning in Project Maths: insights from teachers who participated in PISA 2012. Dublin: ERC; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• O'Meara, N, Prendergast M. Teaching mathematics after hours. J Curric Stud. Under Review.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast M, O'Meara, N. Assigning mathematics instruction time in secondary schools: what are the influential factors? Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2016;47(8):1137–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veal WR, Flinders DJ. How block scheduling reform effects classroom practice.High Sch J. 2001;84(4):21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Quenn JA, Isenhour KG. The 4 x 4 block schedule. New York (NY): Eye on Education Inc; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Durwood C, Krone E, Mazzeo C. Are two algebra classes better than one: the effects of double-dose instruction in Chicago [Policy Brief]. Chicago (IL): Consortium on Chicago School Research; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Canady RL, Rettig MD. The power of innovative scheduling. Educ Lead. 1995;53(3):4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission on Time and Learning (US). Prisoners of time. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Banbury JA. An analysis of changes in teacher instructional practices under block scheduling in seven suburban high schools [dissertation]. Washington (DC): George Washington University; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, LM. The implementation and impact of block scheduling at one high school [dissertation]. Toledo (OH): University of Toledo; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy C, Lundy L, Emerson L, et al. Children's perceptions of primary science assessment in England and Wales. Br Educ Res J. 2013;39(3):585–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni Riordain M, Hannigan A. Out-of-field teaching in post-primary mathematics education: an analysis of the Irish context. Limerick: National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning (NCE-MSTL); 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Balfanz R, Legters N, Jordan W. Catching up: effect of the talent development ninth-grade instructional interventions in reading and mathematics in high poverty schools. NASSP Bull. 2004;88(64):3–30.
   Google Scholar