Focusing attention on auxiliary lines when introduced into geometric problems

References

• Senk SL. How well do students write geometry proofs? Math Teach. 1985;78:448–456.
   Google Scholar
• Ding L, Jones K. Teaching geometry in lower secondary school in Shanghai, China. Proc Br Soc Res Learn Math. 2006;26:41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu HY, Silver EA. Cognitive complexity of mathematics instructional tasks in a Taiwanese classroom: an examination of task sources. J Res Math Educ. 2014;45:460–496. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu H. Geometric calculations are more than calculations. In: J-H Woo, H-C Lew, K-S Park, D-Y Seo, editors. Proceedings of the 31st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 3. Seoul; 2007. p. 57–64. Retrieved March 16, 2016 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499416.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst P. Interactions with diagrams and the making of reasoned conjectures in geometry. ZDM. 2004;36(5):129–139.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst P, Brach C. Proving and doing proofs in high school geometry classes: what is it that is going on for students? Cogn Instr. 2006;24(1):73–122. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh F-J, Horng W-S, Shy H-Y. From exploration to proof production. In: G Hanna, M de Villiers, editors. Proof and proving in mathematics education. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 279–304.
   Google Scholar
• Sharygin I, Protasov V. Does the school of the 21st century need geometry? Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Mathematics Education. Selected materials from Russia National Presentation. Institute of New Technology: Moscow, Russia; 2004. pp. 167–177. Retrieved December 14, 2017 from https://www.google.co.il/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwi55LS4wYnYAhXNb1AKHfXED2MQFggnMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmatematicaeducativa.com%2Fforo%2Fdownload%2Ffile.php%3Fid%3D439%26sid%3D63d607d427aae67b61d7b0b2df778446&usg=AOvVaw1gOrQUfIBKnifLRAxaSMR2.
   Google Scholar
• Sharygin I. Matematika dlia postupayuschih v vuzy [Mathematics for enrolling in higher education]. 6th ed. Moscow: Drofa; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fan L, Qi C, Liu X, et al. Does a transformation approach improve students’ ability in constructing auxiliary lines for solving geometric problems? An intervention-based study with two Chinese classrooms. Educ Stud Math. 2017;96(2):229–248. doi: 10.1007/s10649-017-9772-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair N, Bartolini Bussi MG, de Villiers M, et al. Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report. ZDM – Int J Math Educ. 2016;48:691–719. doi: 10.1007/s11858-016-0796-6
   Google Scholar
• Polya G. How to solve it. 2nd ed. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. Being mathematical with and in front of learners: attention, awareness, and attitude as sources of differences between teacher educators, teachers and learners. In: Jaworski B, Wood T, editors. The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers; 2008. p. 31–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. Attention and intention in learning about teaching through teaching. In: Leikin R, Zazkis R, editors. Learning through teaching mathematics, mathematics teacher education, 5. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 23–47.
   Google Scholar
• Mason J, Burton L, Stacey K. Thinking mathematically. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Palatnik A, Dreyfus T. Students' reasons for introducing auxiliary lines in proving situations. 2018. Number of pages 35. Located at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326009357_Palatnik_Dreyfus_Students_reasons_Auxiliary_lines.
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh D, Stavy R. Intuitive rules: a way to explain and predict students’ reasoning. Educ Stud Math. 1999;38:51–66. doi: 10.1023/A:1003436313032
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. Mathematical abstraction as the result of a delicate shift of attention. For Learn Math. 1989;9(2):2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Palatnik A, Koichu B Exploring insight: focus on shifts of attention. For Learn Math. 2015;35(2):9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Arcavi A. The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educ Stud Math. 2003;52:215–241. doi: 10.1023/A:1024312321077
   Google Scholar
• Coxeter HSM, Greitzer SL. Geometry revisited. Washington (DC): Mathematical Association of America; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers M. Slaying a geometrical monster: finding the area of a crossed quadrilateral. Scott Math Counc J. 2014;44:71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin R. Multiple proof tasks: teacher practice and teacher education. ICME Study. 2009;19(2):31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Palatnik A Proof without words: Varignon's theorem. College Math J. 2017;48(5):354–354. doi: 10.4169/college.math.j.48.5.354
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen RB. Proofs without words: exercises in visual thinking (No. 1). Washington (DC): MAA; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Kondratieva M. Basic geometric configurations and teaching Euclidean geometry. Learn Teach Math. 2011;2011(10):37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Liljedahl P. Illumination: an affective experience? ZDM. 2013;45(2):253–265. doi: 10.1007/s11858-012-0473-3
   Google Scholar