572
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The investigation of prospective mathematics teachers’ non-algebraic solution strategies for word problems

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 563-584 | Received 12 Aug 2018, Published online: 07 Apr 2019

References

  • Koedinger KR, Nathan MJ. The real story behind story problems: effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. J Learn Sci. 2004;13(2):129–164.
  • Akkan Y, Baki A, Çakıroğlu Ü. Examination of the 5th-8th grades students’ transition process from arithmetic to algebra with regard problem solving. Hacettepe Univ J Educ. 2012;43:1–13.
  • Nathan MJ, Koedinger KR. Moving beyond teachers’ intuitive beliefs about algebra learning. Math Teacher. 2000;93:218–223.
  • Schmidt S, Bednarz N. Arithmetical and algebraic types of reasoning used by preservice teachers in a problem-solving context. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2002;2(1):67–90.
  • van Dooren W, Verschaffel L, Onghena P. Pre-service teachers’ preferred strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems. J Math Teacher Educ. 2003;6(1):27–52.
  • Cai J, Lew HC, Morris A, et al. The development of students’ algebraic thinking in earlier grades: a cross-cultural comparative perspective. ZDM Math Educ. 2005;37(1):5–15.
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE). Matematik dersi öğretim programı: ilköğretim 1-8. Sınıflar. [Middle school mathematics curriculum: Grades 1-8]. Ankara; 2017.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston (VA): NCTM; 2000.
  • Gürbüz R, Akkan Y. A comparision of different grade students’ transition levels from arithmetic to algebra: A case for ‘equation’ subject. Educ Sci. 2008;33(148):64–76.
  • Akkan Y, Baki A, Çakıroğlu Ü. Differences between arithmetic and algebra: importance of pre-algebra. Element Educ Online. 2011;10(3):812–823.
  • Jiang C, Hwang S, Cai J. Chinese and Singaporean sixth-grade students’ strategies for solving problems about speed. Educ Stud Math. 2014;87(1):1–24.
  • Kabael T, Akın A. Problem solving strategies and quantitative reasoning skills in solving algebraic verbal problems of seventh grade students. Kastamonu Educ J. 2016;24(2):875–894.
  • Cai J, Moyer M. Developing algebraic thinking in earlier grades: some insights from international comparative studies. In: Greens CE, Rubenstein R, editors. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 2008. p. 169–180.
  • Krulik S, Rudnick JA. Problem solving: a handbook for teachers. 2nd ed Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1987.
  • Ball DL, Hill HC, Bass H. Knowing mathematics for teaching: who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? Am Educ. 2005;29(1):14–46.
  • Ma L. Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. New York (NY): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2010.
  • Cechlárová K, Furcoňová, K, Harminc M. Strategies used for the solution of a nonroutine word problem: A comparison of secondary school pupils and pre-service mathematics teachers. [cited 2018 April 22]. Available from: http://umv.science.upjs.sk/phocadownload/userupload/gabriela.novakova/A4-2014.pdf
  • Initiative CCSS. Common core state standards for mathematics 2010. [cited 2016 December 19]. Available from: http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf.
  • Ministry of Education Singapore (MoES). (2012). Mathematics syllabus: primary one to five. Curriculum Planning and Development Division. Ankara; 2012 [cited 2018 April 20]. Available from: https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/defaultsource/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/primary_mathematics_syllabus_pri1_to_pri5.pdf
  • Kieran C. The learning and teaching of school algebra. In: Grouws DA, editor. The handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan; 1992. p. 390–419.
  • van de Walle JA, Karp KS, Bay-Willians JM. Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally. 8th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2012.
  • van Dooren W, Verschaffel L, Onghena P. The impact of preservice teachers’ content knowledge on their evaluation of students’ strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems. J Res Math Educ. 2002; 33(5); 319–351.
  • Kieran C. Algebraic thinking in the early grades: what is it? Math Educ. 2004;8:139–151.
  • Carpenter TP, Levi L. Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades. Paper presented at: The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2000 April 19–23; Montreal, Canada.
  • Hegarty M, Mayer RE, Monk CA. Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: a comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. J Educ Psychol. 1995;87:18–32.
  • Posamentier AS, Krulik S. Problem solving in mathematics, grades 3–6: powerful strategies to deepen understanding. Thousand Oaks (CA): Corwin; 2009.
  • Schmidt S, Bednarz N. Raisonnements arithmétiques, et algébriques dans un contexte de résolution de problèmes: difficultés rencontrées par les futurs enseignants [arithmetical and algebraic reasoning in a problem-solving context: difficulties met by future teachers]. Educ Stud Math. 1997;32(2):127–155.
  • de Corte E, Greer B, Verschaffel L. Mathematics teaching and learning. In: Berliner DC, Calfee RC, editor. Handbook of educational psychology. New York: MacMillan; 1996. p. 491–549.
  • Warren E. The role of arithmetic structure in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Math Educ Res J. 2003;15(2):122–137.
  • Didiş MG, Erbaş AK. Lise öğrencilerinin cebirsel sözel problemleri çözmedeki başarısı [The ability of high school students to solve algebraic word problems]. Proceedings of the X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı; 2012 Jun 27–30; Niğde University, Turkey; 2012, p. 430.
  • Soylu Y. The models used by elementary school teachers to solve verbal problems. Aust J Teacher Educ. 2010;35(4):25–40.
  • Kabael T, Kızıltoprak F. Sixth grade students’ ways of thinking associated with solving algebraic verbal problems. In: Oesterle S, Nicol C, Liljedahl P, et al., editors. Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36. Vancouver, Canada; 2014. p. 120.
  • Gökkurt-Özdemir B, Erdem E, Örnek T, et al. Are middle school mathematics teachers able to solve word problems without using variable? Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2017;49(1):85–106.
  • Filloy E, Rojano T. Solving equations: the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Learn Math. 1989;9(2):19–25.
  • Ng SF, Lee K. The model method: Singapore children's tool for representing and solving algebraic word problems. J Res Math Educ. 2009;40(3):282–313.
  • Reed SK. Word problems: research and curriculum reform. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999.
  • Chu J, Rittle-Johnson B, Fyfe ER. Diagrams benefit symbolic problem-solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2017;87(2):273–287.
  • Bednarz N, Janvier B. Emergence and development of algebra as a problem-solving tool: continuities and discontinuities with arithmetic. In: Bednarz N, Kieran C, Lee L, editor. Approaches to algebra: perspectives for research and teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1996. p. 115–136.
  • Lubin A, Houde O, de Neys W. Evidence for children's error sensitivity during arithmetic word problem solving. Learn Instr. 2015;40:1–8.
  • Uesaka Y, Manalo E, Ichikawa S. What kinds of perceptions and daily learning behaviors promote students’ use of diagrams in mathematics problem solving? Learn Instr. 2007;17(3):322–335.
  • Silver EA, Cai J. Assessing students’ mathematical problem posing. Teach Child Math. 2005;12:129–135.
  • Shimizu Y. Japanese approach to teaching mathematics via problem solving. In: Kaur B, Har YB, Kapur M, editor. Mathematical problem solving. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing; 2009. p. 89–101.
  • Haylock D. Recognising mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik. 1997;29(3):68–74.
  • Silver EA. Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik. 1997;29(3):75–80.
  • Güven B, Aydın-Güç F, Özmen ZM. Problem types used in math lessons: the relationship between student achievement and teacher preferences. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2016;47(6):863–876.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.